green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.5 score
“beyond doubt, the legislative intent of this provision was to make the ordinary law of agency applicable to'the attribution of individual acts to both employers and unions.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Overnite Transportation Company v. National Labor Relations Board, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 728, Intervenor
beyond doubt, the legislative intent of this provision was to make the ordinary law of agency applicable to'the attribution of individual acts to both employers and unions.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris Trust and Savings Bank v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co.
ERISA provides that: Any person who is a fiduciary with respect to a [covered] plan who breaches any of the responsibilities, obligations, or duties imposed upon fiduciaries by this subchapter shall be ... subject to such other equitable or remedial relief as the court may deem appropriate, including removal of such fiduciary. 29 U.S.C. § 1109 (a); see Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 281 (2d Cir.) (fiduciaries may be removed for “repeated or substantial violation^] of [their] responsibilities”) (quoting Marshall v. Snyder, 572 F.2d 894, 901 (2d Cir.1978)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 10…
discussed
Cited "see"
Owen v. SoundView Financial Group, Inc.
See Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 88 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984). *326 However, “prejudgment interest is a discretionary matter for the court and should be awarded only in cases where such an award is ‘fair, equitable and necessary to compensate the wronged party fully.’” Mendez v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Assoc. & College Retirement Equities Fund, 982 F.2d 783 , 790 (2d Cir.1992) (quoting Wickham Contracting v. Local Union No. 3, IBEW, 955 F.2d 831, 835 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 946 , 113 S.Ct. 394 , 121 L.Ed.2d 302 (19…
cited
Cited "see"
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Leroy Holding Co. (In Re Fort Ann Express Inc.)
See Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barger v. Hayes County Non-Stock Co-Op (In Re Barger)
See Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc., 733 *245 F.2d 509, 515 (8th Cir.) (motions under Rule 60(b) are viewed with disfavor), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Evans v. State of Conn.
See, Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Humphrey
See Williams v. Kunze, 806 F.2d 594, 598 (5th Cir.1986), see also United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1055 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984) (holding that in situations which make detailed particularity impossible then “generic language suffices if it particularizes the types of items to be seized”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Torres v. Costich
See Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984) (prime rate plus one percent); Dependahl v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 653 F.2d 1208, 1219-20 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 512 , 70 L.Ed.2d 384 (1981) (Missouri statutory rate); Foltz v. U.S. News & World Report Inc., 613 F.Supp. 634, 648-49 (D.C.D.C.1985) (District of Columbia statutory rate); River Oaks Marine v. Town of Grand Island, No. 89-CV-1016S, 1992 WL 373533 at *7 (W.D.N.Y.
cited
Cited "see"
Marisol A. by Next Friend Forbes v. Giuliani
See Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 278 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984); Buscemi v. Pepsico, Inc., 736 F.Supp. 1267, 1271-72 (S.D.N.Y.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Castillo-Garcia
See United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1055 (5th Cir.) (courts will not invalidate a wiretap order because defense lawyers are able to suggest post factum some investigative technique that might have been used and was not), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984); United States v. Johnson, 645 F.2d 865, 867 (10th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 866 , 102 S.Ct. 329 , 70 L.Ed.2d 168 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank v. Relin
See Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984) (using the rate of prime plus one percent); Dependahl v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 653 F.2d 1208, 1219-20 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 968 , 102 S.Ct. 512 , 70 L.Ed.2d 384 (1981) (using the Missouri statutory rate); Foltz v. U.S. News & World Report Inc., 613 F.Supp. 634, 648-49 (D.C.D.C.1985) (using the District of Columbia statutory rate); River Oaks Marine, 1992 WL 373533 at *7 (using the adjusted prime rate); Cefali, 748 F.Supp. at 1025 (using the postjudgment rate).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher P. Alford
See United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1056 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bennett
See United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984); United States v. Johnson, 645 F.2d 865, 876 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 866 , 102 S.Ct. 329 , 70 L.Ed.2d 168 (1981); United States v. Clements, 588 F.2d 1030 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 243 (1979); United States v. McCoy, 539 F.2d 1050 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919 , 97 S.Ct. 2185 , 53 L.Ed.2d 230 (1977); United States v. Smith, 893 F.2d 1573 (9th Cir.1990); Nunez, 877 F.2d at 1472 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William M. Kelly
See United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1056 (5th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Beaumont
See Supplemental Record on Appeal, vol. 2, at 135-48. 9 denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S. Ct. 565 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Kelly
See United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1056 (5th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S. Ct. 565 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Monfort, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
See Local 1814, Int'l Longshoremen Ass'n v. NLRB, 735 F.2d 1384 , 1404 n. 26 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984)
cited
Cited "see"
Monfort, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
See Local 1814, Int'l Longshoremen Ass’n v. NLRB, 735 F.2d 1384 , 1404 n. 26 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Graham v. Wyeth Laboratories
See Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A. & P. Steel, Inc., 733 F.2d 509 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984) (a witness' perjury in his deposition and at trial, [like Dr. Geier’s miscalculation of the toxicity level of DTP] constituted newly discovered evidence. .
cited
Cited "see"
Brock v. Group Legal Administrators, Inc.
See Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 278-79 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Conrad Whitehead, Ii, United States of America v. Hector Quesada
(2×)
See United States v. Beale, 736 F.2d 1289, 1291 (9th Cir.) (en banc) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984); 1 W.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Benny Carl Lovell
See United States v. Beale, 736 F.2d 1289, 1292 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond M. McDonald
See United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1056-57 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Hoskins v. United States, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Dennis E. Whitfield, Deputy Secretary of United States Department of Labor v. Roland R. Pennington, Jr.
See Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984); Gilliam v. Edwards, 492 F.Supp. 1255, 1266-67 (D.N.J.1980); Freund v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank, 485 F.Supp. 629 , 644 n. 7 (W.D.Wis.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Rad Services, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company
See Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc., 733 F.2d 509, 521 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Randy Lee Erwin
(2×)
Id.; see United States v. Beale, 736 F.2d 1289, 1291 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984). 21 The Court acknowledged, however, that a "seizure of personal luggage from ... the traveler's immediate possession ... intrudes on both the suspect's possessory interest in his luggage as well as his liberty interest in proceeding with his itinerary." 462 U.S. at 708 , 103 S.Ct. at 2645.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Elmer Keck, Larry Hill, Diane Hise, Diana Elliott, Terry Beasley, and Debbie Hill
See United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1053-54 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene Hardin, Sr. (84-5643), Eugene Hardin, Jr. (84-5644) Paul A. Bisic, Jr. (84-5736) Norvin E. Green, III (84-5737)
See United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1056 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 105 S. Ct. 565 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Nobile v. Pension Committee of the Pension Plan
See Katsaros v. Cody (2d Cir.1984) 744 F.2d 270, 278-79 , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brookridge Funding Corp. v. Aquamarine, Inc.
See also Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc., 733 F.2d 509, 520-521 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984) (in suit by tribe against contractor on irrigation project, tribe could introduce invocation of privilege by chairperson of tribal corporation responsible for administration of tribal land who conspired with others to defraud tribe).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stanford v. AT & T CORP.
See, e.g., Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 278 (2d Cir.) (no right to jury trial of ERISA actions seeking restitution), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984); Cox v. Keystone Carbon Co., 894 F.2d 647, 649-50 (3rd Cir.) (plaintiff not entitled to jury trial on claim for benefits, and claim for compensatory damages for tortious interference does not fall within § 1132(a)(1)(B) of ERISA), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 811 , 111 S.Ct. 47 , 112 L.Ed.2d 23 (1990); Berry v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 761 F.2d 1003, 1007 (4th Cir.1985) (proceedings to determine rights under employee ben…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mullins v. Pfizer, Inc.
See also, Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270 ,. 278 (1984) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984) (discussed infra).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Algie v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.
See e.g., Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 *899 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sullivan v. LTV Aerospace and Defense Co.
See, e.g., Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 278-79 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984) (other citations omitted)....” Howard, 807 F.2d at 1567 . 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. The Mutual Life Insurance Company Of New York
WIGMORE, 8 EVIDENCE IN TRIALS AT COMMON LAW Sec. 2272, at 439 (McNaughten rev. 1961 & Supp.1991); See also Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc., 733 F.2d 509, 522 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. Mutual Life Insurance
Wigmore, 8 Evidenoe In Trials At Common Law § 2272, at 439 (McNaughten rev. 1961 & Supp.1991); See also Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc., 733 F.2d 509, 522 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kinek v. Gulf & Western, Inc.
See also Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 281 (2d Cir.) (“ERISA grants the court wide discretion in fashioning equitable relief to protect the rights of pension fund beneficiaries including the award of prejudgment interest”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984); see also Wickham Contracting v. Local Union No. 3, 955 F.2d 831, 833-36 (2d Cir.) (discussing law of prejudgment interest under sever al federal statutes, including ERISA), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 394 , 121 L.Ed.2d 302 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Coleman England, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Beale, 736 F.2d 1289, 1292 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manes v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Passenger Corp. v. One 25,900 Square Foot Parcel of Land, 766 F.2d 685 , 688 (2d Cir.1985); see also Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc., 733 F.2d 509, 517 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984); Famarjian v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., 474 F.2d 361, 364-365 (2d Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Walt Anthony Sturmoski, A/K/A Anthony W. Williams
See United States v. Erickson, 676 F.2d 408, 410 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 853 , 103 S.Ct. 118 , 74 L.Ed.2d 103 (1982); see also United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1056 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Steeples v. Time Insurance
See also Berry v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 761 F.2d 1003 (4th Cir.1985), Blau v. Del Monte Corp., 748 F.2d 1348 (9th Cir.1984), Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984), In re Vorpahl, 695 F.2d 318 (8th Cir.1982), Calamia v. Spivey, 632 F.2d 1235 (5th Cir.1980), Wardle v. Central States Pension Fund, 627 F.2d 820 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1112 , 101 S.Ct. 922 , 66 L.Ed.2d 841 (1981), and Howard v. Parisian, Inc., 807 F.2d 1560 (11th Cir.1987). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chaplin v. Harbison Group (In Re Friedberg)
Securities, Inc., 574 F.2d 90, 95-96 (2d Cir.1978) (action by SEC for injunction and disgorgement of profits); see also Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 278 (2d Cir.) (ERISA action against trustees for removal and restitution), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984), it has recently held that a party seeking recission on the grounds of fraud is entitled to a jury trial in a bankruptcy proceeding.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Aureliano Galindo Vasquez
See also United States v. Beale, 736 F.2d 1289, 1290-91 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984); United States v. Klein, 626 F.2d 22, 24-25 (7th Cir.1980) (pre-Place).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
James Charles Williams v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
See, e.g., Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc., 733 F.2d 509, 519 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sandini
See, e.g., United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1052-54 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984) (rejecting claim of antagonistic defenses where one co-defendant, indicted for conducting a continuing criminal enterprise and conspiracy, admitted involvement in the cocaine conspiracy); United States v. Lurz, 666 F.2d 69, 80 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1005 , 102 S.Ct. 1642 , 71 L.Ed.2d 874 (1982); United States v. Bolts, 558 F.2d 316, 322 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 930 , 98 S.Ct. 417 , 54 L.Ed.2d 290 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sandini
See, e.g., United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1048, 1052-54 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984) (rejecting claim of antagonistic defenses where one co-defendant, indicted for conducting a continuing criminal enterprise and conspiracy, admitted involvement in the cocaine conspiracy); United States v. Lurz, 666 F.2d 69, 80 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1005 , 102 S.Ct. 1642 , 71 L.Ed.2d 874 (1982); United States v. Bolts, 558 F.2d 316, 322 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 930 , 98 S.Ct. 417 , 54 L.Ed.2d 290 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DISTRICT 65, UAW v. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.
See Leigh v. Engle, 727 F.2d 113, 125-26 (7th Cir.1984), citing Donovan v. Bierwirth, 680 F.2d at 272 (fiduciaries “are obliged at a minimum to engage in an intensive and scrupulous independent investigation of their options to insure that they act in the best interests of the plan beneficiaries”); see also Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 279 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984). 4 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Whitt v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
See, e.g., Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270, 278-79 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984); Turner v. CF & I Steel Corp., 770 F.2d 43, 47 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1058 , 106 S.Ct. 800 , 88 L.Ed.2d 776 (1986); Berry v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 761 F.2d 1003, 1006-07 (4th Cir.1985); Wardle v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund, 627 F.2d 820, 828-30 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1112 , 101 S.Ct. 922 , 66 L.Ed.2d 841 (1981); In re Vorpahl, 695 F.2d 318, 319-22 (8th Cir.1982). 807 F.2d at 1567 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Slowikowski
See, e.g., United States v. Beale, 674 F.2d 1327 (9th Cir.1982), vacated and remanded, 463 U.S. 1202 , 103 S.Ct. 3529 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1382 (1983), on rehearing, 736 F.2d 1289 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1072 , 105 S.Ct. 565 , 83 L.Ed.2d 506 (1984); [7] People v. Evans, 65 Cal. App.3d 924 , 134 Cal. Rptr. 436 (1977); People v. Unruh, 713 P.2d 370 (Colo.), cert. den. ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 2894 , 90 L.Ed.2d 981 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
A & P Steel, Inc.
v.
Rosebud Sioux Tribe
v.
Rosebud Sioux Tribe
No. 84-338.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 1984.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.