green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Limited
Geisler v. Pansegrau (In Re Pansegrau)
Simpson & Co. v. Shuler (In re Shuler), 722 F.2d 1253 , 1265 n. 2, 1258 n. 10 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 85 , 83 L.Ed.2d 32 (1984) (Applying federal collateral estoppel rules under § 523 and noting that the “full faith and credit” accorded state court judgments has been limited by competing federal interests [the bankruptcy court’s exclusive jurisdiction to determine discharge-ability] ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barr v. Overmyer (In Re Overmyer)
See Matter of Shuler, 722 F.2d 1253 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 85 , 83 L.Ed.2d 32 (1984); Matter of Allman, 735 F.2d 863 (5th Cir.1984); Spilman v. Harley, 656 F.2d 224 (6th Cir.1981); (federal test for issue preclusion should be applied); Compare In re Stowell, 102 B.R. 589 (Bankr.W.D.Tex.1989); In re Byard, 47 *278 B.R. 700 (Bankr.M.D.Tenn.1985); (In light of the recent developments in full faith and credit laws set forth in Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 470 U.S. 373 , 105 S.Ct. 1327 , 84 L.Ed.2d 274 (1985), state issue preclusion standards …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy J. Pogue
See United States v. McMichael, 699 F.2d 193, 195 (4th Cir.1983) (district court authorized to order restitution in any amount up to the sum defendant and counsel agreed to at sentencing hearing); see also United States v. Davies, 683 F.2d 1052, 1055 (7th Cir.1982) (denial of Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 challenge to size of restitution order affirmed in part because the order had been limited to “the amount of ... defendant’s admitted depredations”); see generally United States v. Franks, 723 F.2d 1482, 1487 (10th Cir.1983) (in criminal prosecution for violation of tax laws, defendant may not be re…
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Extradition of Tang Yee-Chun
See Kamrin v. United States, 725 F.2d 1225, 1227-28 (9th Cir.) (due process in extradition proceeding — arguably required by language of U.S.-Australia treaty — did not include speedy trial requirement), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 85 , 83 L.Ed.2d 32 (1984); Simmons v. Braun, 627 F.2d 635, 636 (2d Cir.1980) (no right to cross-examine witnesses or to rebut prosecu-torial evidence, citing Bingham v. Bradley, 241 U.S. 511, 517 , 36 S.Ct. 634, 637 , 60 L.Ed. 1136 (1916)); Jhirad v. Ferrandina, 536 F.2d 478 , 485 n. 9 (2d Cir.) (no sixth amendment guarantee of speedy trial), cert. de…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lui Kin-Hong v. United States
See, e.g., In re Extradition of Rouvier, 839 F.Supp. 537, 539 (N.D.Ill.1993) (citing Kamrin v. United States, 725 F.2d 1225, 1227-28 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 85 , 83 L.Ed.2d 32 (1984)); In re Extradition of Nacif-Borge, 829 F.Supp. 1210, 1214 (D.Nev. 1993); United States v. Hills, 765 F.Supp. 381 , 384 n. 5 (E.D.Mich.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas James Martin v. Warden, Atlanta Pen, U.S. Marshall Service
(2×)
In re Extradition of Kraiselburd, 786 F.2d 1395, 1398 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 990 , 107 S.Ct. 586 , 93 L.Ed.2d 588 (1986); see also Kamrin v. United States, 725 F.2d 1225, 1227-28 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 85 , 83 L.Ed.2d 32 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina
Roman v. ESB, Inc., 550 F.2d 1343 , 1348 (4th Cir.1976); see also National Ass’n for Mental Health, Inc. v. Califano, 717 F.2d 1451, 1459 (D.C.Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 85 , 83 L.Ed.2d 32 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re William Wallace, Debtor. Mark Klemens v. William Wallace
See, e.g., Harold v. Simpson and Co. v. Shuler (In re Shuler), 722 F.2d 1253, 1255 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 85 , 83 L.Ed.2d 32 (1984); Spilman v. Harley, 656 F.2d 224, 227 (6th Cir.1981); cf. Lombard v. Axtens (In re Lombard), 739 F.2d 499, 502 (10th Cir.1984) (dicta indicating that collateral estoppel may be invoked in dischargeability actions under section 17(a)(2) of former Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S. C. § 35(a)(2) (1976), where bankruptcy court had exclusive jurisdiction to determine dischargeability; question left unanswered since collateral estoppel requirements no…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fred Combs v. Alvin Richardson
See, e.g., Matter of Shuler. 722 F.2d 1253, 1256 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 85 , 83 L.Ed. 2d 32 (1984); Spilman, supra, 656 F.2d at 227-28 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Francine Klingman v. Melvin E. Levinson
Compare In re Rahm, 641 F.2d 755, 757 (9th Cir.) (a prior state court judgment has no collateral estoppel force on a bankruptcy court considering dischargeability, but may establish a prima facie case of nondischargeability), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 860 , 102 S.Ct. 313 , 70 L.Ed.2d 157 (1981) with Matter of Shuler, 722 F.2d 1253, 1256 (5th Cir.) (“collateral estoppel may apply to subsidiary facts actually litigated and necessarily decided”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 817 , 105 S.Ct. 85 , 83 L.Ed.2d 32 (1984); Goss v. Goss, 722 F.2d 599, 602-04 (10th Cir.1983), and Matter of Ross, 602 F.2d 604,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of the Extradition of Jorge Gustavo Kraiselburd. United States of America v. Jorge Gustavo Kraiselburd
See, e.g., Kamrin v. United States, 725 F.2d 1225, 1227-28 (9th Cir.) (holding due process protections not applicable where Australia sought extradition many years after crime occurred), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 85 , 83 L.Ed.2d 32 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HAROLD
v.
SIMPSON & COMPANY v. Ronald William SHULER
v.
SIMPSON & COMPANY v. Ronald William SHULER
No. 83-1634.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
105 S. Ct. 85
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Denied.