green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1926 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1926
1976
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cornelio
See United States v. Napolitano, 761 F.2d 135, 137 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 842 , 106 S.Ct. 129 , 88 L.Ed.2d 106 (1985) (§ 3162(a)(1) requires dismissal only of “such charge against the individual contained in such complaint”) (emphasis in original).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hunter
See Hili v. Sciarrotta, 140 F.3d 210, 215 (2d Cir.1998) ("[H]earsay information may unquestionably be used in the discretion of the sentencing judge and given such weight as appears in his discretion to be merited.") (quoting United States v. Napolitano, 761 F.2d 135, 139 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 842 , 106 S.Ct. 129 , 88 L.Ed.2d 106 (1985)). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Schism v. United States
See Zucker v. United States, 758 F.2d 637 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 842 , 106 S.Ct. 129 , 88 L.Ed.2d 105 (1985); Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 539 (D.C.Cir.1983); Milliken v. Gleason, 332 F.2d 122, 123 (1st Cir.1964) C‘[V]eterans’ benefits are gratuities and establish no vested rights in the recipients so that they may be withdrawn by Congress at any time and under such conditions as Congress may impose.”), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 1002, 85 S.Ct. 723 , 13 L.Ed.2d 703 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Kinne v. United States
Slotnick v. United States, 8 Cl.Ct. 784, 788 (1985); see Zucker v. United States, 758 F.2d 637 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 842 , 106 S.Ct. 129 , 88 L.Ed.2d 105 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerald Rowell, A/K/A \Jerry or Jerome
See United States v. Napolitano, 761 F.2d 135, 139 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 842 , 106 S.Ct. 129 , 88 L.Ed.2d 106 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Energy Mgt. P 26,603 Panhandle Producers & Royalty Owners Association v. Economic Regulatory Administration
See State of Texas v. United States, 766 F.2d 419 , 427 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 843 , 106 S.Ct. 129 , 88 L.Ed.2d 106 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Turvene v. United States
See Shelleman, 9 Cl.Ct. at 457 (“[T]he CSRA effected a sweeping reorganization of the Civil Service System such that the MSPB became the primary and sole vehicle for adjudicating ... prohibited personnel practices....”); accord Thomas v. GSA, 756 F.2d 86, 89 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 843 , 106 S.Ct. 129 , 88 L.Ed.2d 106 (1985) (suspension includes placing employee on non-duty, non-pay status for reasons other than discipline); Bivens, 12 Cl.Ct. at 731 (forced medical retirement constitutes a suspension claim under the CSRA).
cited
Cited "see"
Bollinger v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Raphan v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 457 (1983), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 759 F.2d 879 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 129 , 88 L.Ed.2d 106 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Schism v. United States
See, e.g., Hoffman v. City of Warwick, 909 F.2d 608, 616 (1st Cir.1990), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 842 , 106 S.Ct. 129 , 88 L.Ed.2d 105 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trencor, Inc., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner
(2×)
The Court has stated that “[w]hile we may not supply a reasoned basis for the agency’s action that the agency itself has not given, we will uphold a decision of less than ideal clarity if the agency’s path may reasonably be discerned.” Bowman Transp. v. Arkansas-Best Freight Sys., 419 U.S. 281, 285-86 , 95 S.Ct. 438, 442 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974); see also State of Texas v. United States, 756 F.2d 419, 427 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 843 , 106 S.Ct. 129 , 88 L.Ed.2d 106 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Steven Angelo Ward
We need not address the general question of whether a statement disclaiming ownership should be considered an abandonment of any privacy interest, because under the circumstances of this case any abandonment was ineffective because it was tainted by the prior illegality. “[Abandonment will not be recognized when it is the result of illegal police conduct.” United States v. Brady, 842 F.2d 1313 , 1315 n. 7 (D.C.Cir.1988); see also United States v. Lucci, 758 F.2d 153, 155 (6th Cir.) (disclaimer prompted by an unconstitutional seizure or arrest does not preclude exclusion), cert. denied, 474…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Benjamin RAPHAN and Myrna Raphan
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 85-11.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
106 S. Ct. 129
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.