green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Minley v. Shinn
Actual prejudice 19 requires a habeas petitioner to “show not merely that the errors . . . created a possibility of 20 prejudice, but that they worked to his actual and substantial disadvantage, infecting his 21 entire trial with error of constitutional dimensions.” Murray, 477 U.S. at 494, 106 S. Ct. 22 at 2648 (emphasis in original) (internal quotations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Basketball Association v. Sdc Basketball Club, Inc.
See Air Prods. & Chems., Inc., v. Reichhold Chems., Inc., 755 F.2d 1559, 1563 (Fed.Cir.) (existence of a state law defense, even if pleaded in the complaint for declaratory judgment, does not defeat subject-matter jurisdiction), petition for cert. dismissed by agreement of the parties, 473 U.S. 929 , 106 S.Ct. 22 , 87 L.Ed.2d 700 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Basketball Ass'n v. SDC Basketball Club, Inc.
See Air Prods. & Chems., Inc., v. Reichhold Chems., Inc., 755 F.2d 1559, 1563 (Fed.Cir.) (existence of a state law defense, even if pleaded in the complaint for declaratory judgment, does not defeat subject-matter jurisdiction), petition for cert, dismissed by agreement of the parties, 473 U.S. 929 , 106 S.Ct. 22 , 87 L.Ed.2d 700 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Applied Computer Sciences, Inc., James Abbenhaus and Rodger D. Noel, Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Applied Computer Sciences, Inc., James Abbenhaus and Rodger D. Noel
"The district court's 'arising under' jurisdiction in patent cases is properly measured at the complaint stage of the proceedings." Xeta, Inc. v. Atex, Inc., 825 F.2d 604, 606 (1st Cir.1987); see also Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc., 755 F.2d 1559, 1562 (Fed.Cir.), cert. dismissed, 473 U.S. 929 , 106 S.Ct. 22 , 87 L.Ed.2d 700 (1985). 14 The three consolidated cases which resulted in the consent judgment were grounded on the district court's patent jurisdiction.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Applied Computer Sciences, Inc.
“The district court’s ‘arising under’ jurisdiction in patent cases is properly measured at the complaint stage of the proceedings.” Xeta, Inc. v. Atex, Inc., 825 F.2d 604, 606 (1st Cir.1987); see also Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc., 755 F.2d 1559, 1562 (Fed.Cir.), cert. dismissed, 473 U.S. 929 , 106 S.Ct. 22 , 87 L.Ed.2d 700 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John H. Hartley, Jr., M.D. v. Mentor Corporation, Defendant/third-Party v. American Hospital Supply Corporation, Third-Party
Stores, Inc. v. Moitie, 452 U.S. 394 , 397 n. 2, 101 S.Ct. 2424 , 2427 n. 2, 69 L.Ed.2d 103 (1981); see also Air Prods. & Chems., Inc. v. Reichhold Chems., Inc., 755 F.2d 1559, 1561 , 225 USPQ 121, 122 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 929 , 106 S.Ct. 22 , 87 L.Ed.2d 700 (1985). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Civil Liberties Union v. Federal Communications Commission
See, e.g., Middle South Energy, Inc. v. FERC, 747 F.2d 763 , 772 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert, dismissed, 473 U.S. 930 , 106 S.Ct. 22 , 87 L.Ed.2d 700 (1985) (“We accept the Commission’s characterization of Order No. 303 as an interpretive rule that, of its own force, creates no law and binds neither the public, the agency, nor the courts.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Civil Liberties Union v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Tele-Communications, Inc., Intervenors. Cable Television Access Coalition, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Tele-Communications, Inc., Intervenors. National League of Cities v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Tele-Communications, Inc., Intervenors. National Federation of Local Cable Programmers v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Tele-Communications, Inc., Intervenors. City of New York v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Tele-Communications, Inc., Intervenors. Guam Cable Tv v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Tele-Communications, Inc., Intervenors. County of Contra Costa, California v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Tele-Communications, Inc., Intervenors. Yakima Valley Cablevision, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County, Va, Cities of Sunnyside and Grandview, Wash. And City of Southfield, Michigan, National Cable Television Association, Inc., Centel Corporation, Intervenors. Connecticut Cable Television Association, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, National Cable Television Association, Inc., Centel Corporation, Intervenors
See, e.g., Middle South Energy, Inc. v. FERC, 747 F.2d 763 , 772 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. dismissed, 473 U.S. 930 , 106 S.Ct. 22 , 87 L.Ed.2d 700 (1985) ("We accept the Commission's characterization of Order No. 303 as an interpretive rule that, of its own force, creates no law and binds neither the public, the agency, nor the courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.
v.
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
v.
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
No. 84-1875.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Sep 13, 1985.
Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.