green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Masood Shirazi-Parsa Georgina Shirazi-Parsa v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Young v. INS, 759 F.2d 450 , 456 n. 8 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 , 106 S.Ct. 412 , 88 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carlos Armando Castillo-Rodriguez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Young v. INS, 759 F.2d 450 , 455 n. 6 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 , 106 S.Ct. 412 , 88 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985). *185 Castillo-Rodríguez first contends that the immigration judge erred in finding that his testimony was self-serving and that he seemed paranoid and not credible as a witness.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rasool v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Young v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, INS, 759 F.2d 450 , 455 n. 6 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 , 106 S.Ct. 412 , 88 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985) (denial of discretionary relief, such as asylum, may not be disturbed absent abuse of discretion); 6 San *193 kar v. I.N.S., 757 F.2d 532 (3d Cir.1985) (court will overturn decision of the BIA only if it abused its discretion). 7 B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Narciso Vallez Melendez v. U.S. Department of Justice and Immigration and Naturalization Service
Compare Campos-Guardado v. INS, 809 F.2d 285, 286-89 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 826 , 108 S.Ct. 92 , 98 L.Ed.2d 53 (1987) (affirming the Board because “the record reflects substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusions that Ms. Campos is not entitled to withholding of deportation and is not eligible for a discretionary grant of asylum,” but later noting that “the ultimate denial of asylum” cannot be disturbed “absent a showing that such action was arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion”) (quoting Young v. INS, 759 F.2d 450 , 455 n. 6 (5th Cir.), cert. d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
FITZROY NATHANIEL LAWRENCE v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
Any alien’s application for bail or bond must be submitted directly to the Attorney General, whose ruling is subject to review by a district court in proceedings separate and distinct from deportation proceedings. 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(1); In re Ghalamsiah, 806 F.2d 68, 73 (3rd Cir. 1986); See also Young v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, INS, 759 F.2d 450, 457 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 996 , 106 S. Ct. 412 , 88 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daniels
v.
Papasan
v.
Papasan
No. 85-5286.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 18, 1985.
Cited by 29 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.