green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.5 score
“efendant must show that the failure to earlier disclose prejudiced him because it came so late that the information disclosed could not be effectively used at trial.”
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Perry Melton, A.K.A. Perry Milton
efendant must show that the failure to earlier disclose prejudiced him because it came so late that the information disclosed could not be effectively used at trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
Abendschein v. Montgomery County, Md.
See Austin v. Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc., 78 F.3d 875, 879 (4th Cir.) (quoting Adkins v. Times-World Corp., 771 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 896 , 88 L.Ed.2d 930 (1986)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 432 , 136 L.Ed.2d 330 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marcus Wayne Williams
See United States v. Darwin, 757 F.2d 1193, 1202 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1110 , 106 S.Ct. 896 , 88 L.Ed.2d 930 (1986) (extent of cross-examination relating to credibility is within the trial court’s sound discretion).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Birch v. the Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.
See, e.g., Adkins v. Times-World Corp., 771 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 896 , 88 L.Ed.2d 930 (1986) (explaining that it is clear that, “except for matters specifically excluded from arbitration, in the collective bargaining agreement, all questions on which the parties disagree must be submitted to arbitration” (citations omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Castro
(2×)
Fed.R.Evid. 608(b); see also United States v. Darwin, 757 F.2d 1193, 1204 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1110 , 106 S.Ct. 896 , 88 L.Ed.2d 930 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
White v. National Steel Corp.
See e.g., Adkins v. Times-World Corp., 771 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1109 , 106 S.Ct. 896 , 88 L.Ed.2d 930 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adkins
v.
Times-World Corp.
v.
Times-World Corp.
No. 85-888.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 27, 1986.
Lead Opinion
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Dissent
Justice White,
with whom Justice Brennan joins,
dissenting.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held in this case that it had jurisdiction under 28 U. S. C. § 1292(a)(1) to hear respondents’ appeal of a District Court order staying arbitration proceedings to which respondents were parties. 771 F.. 2d 829 (1985). This holding conflicts with the decisions in Lummus Co. v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., 297 F. 2d 80 (CA2 1961), cert. denied, 368 U. S. 986 (1962), and Diematic Mfg. Corp. v. Packaging Industries, Inc., 516 F. 2d 975 (CA2), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 913 (1975). I would grant certiorari to resolve this conflict.