Schurman v. United States Pat. & Trademark Off., 479 U.S. 933 (1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Schurman v. United States Pat. & Trademark Off., 479 U.S. 933 (1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Washington Public Power Supply System v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation and the American Insurance Company, a New Jersey Corporation, Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Washington Public Power Supply System, a Washington Municipal Corporation Vera Claussen Kenneth Cochrant Raymond Colbert Cornelius Duffie Sam Farmer Carl Halvorson Parker Knight Paul Nolan Lois Powell Sydney Steinborn Louis Winnard James Perko Richard Breshnahan (ca9, 1989-05-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Washington Public Power Supply System v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation and the American Insurance Company, a New Jersey Corporation, Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Washington Public Power Supply System, a Washington Municipal Corporation Vera Claussen Kenneth Cochrant Raymond Colbert Cornelius Duffie Sam Farmer Carl Halvorson Parker Knight Paul Nolan Lois Powell Sydney Steinborn Louis Winnard James Perko Richard Breshnahan
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
However, Washington law is clear that "[t]he intent of the parties to the contract is to be gleaned from the document itself, and only if it is ambiguous is parol evidence regarding the parties' actual intent admissible." McGary, 661 P.2d at 974 (emphasis added); see Seattle Totems Hockey Club, Inc. v. National Hockey League, 783 F.2d 1347, 1354 (9th Cir.) (applying Washington law), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 932 , 107 S.Ct. 405 , 93 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986); Barnett v. Buchan Baking Co., 45 Wash.App. 152 , 724 P.2d 1077, 1081 (1986), aff'd, 108 Wash.2d 405 , 738 P.2d 1056 (1987) (stating that court sho…
discussed Cited "see" Washington Public Power Supply System v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corp.
9th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
However, Washington law is clear that “[t]he intent of the parties to the contract is to be gleaned from the document itself, and only if it is ambiguous is parol evidence regarding the parties’ actual intent admissible.” McGary, 661 P.2d at 974 (emphasis added); see Seattle Totems Hockey Club, Inc. v. National Hockey League, 783 F.2d 1347, 1354 (9th Cir.) (applying Washington law), cert, denied, 479 U.S. 932 , 107 S.Ct. 405 , 93 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986); Barnett v. Buchan Baking Co., 45 Wash.App. 152 , 724 P.2d 1077,1081 (1986), affd, 108 Wash. 2d 405 , 738 P.2d 1056 (1987) (stating that cour…
discussed Cited "see" McGLINCHY v. SHELL CHEMICAL CO.
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Seattle Totems Hockey Club v. National Hockey League, 783 F.2d 1347 , 1350 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 405 , 93 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986). 55 Because appellants can prove no set of facts consistent with their complaint that would entitle them to relief under the antitrust laws, appellants have not sufficiently stated an antitrust claim relating to the PB market.
cited Cited "see" McGlinchy v. Shell Chemical Co.
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Seattle Totems Hockey Club v. National Hockey League, 783 F.2d 1347 , 1350 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 405 , 93 L.Ed.2d 357 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schurman
v.
United States Patent and Trademark Office
No. 86-477.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 3, 1986.
479 U.S. 933
Published

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.