green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Whitehead Oil Co. v. City of Lincoln
See Nectow v. City of Cambridge, 277 U.S. 183, 236 , 48 S.Ct. 447, 448 , 72 L.Ed.842 (1928); Greenbriar v. City of Alabaster, 881 F.2d 1570 , 1577 (11th Cir. 1989); Stansberry v. Holmes, 613 F.2d 1285 , 1289 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980); but see Shelton v. City of College Station, 780 F.2d 475, 482 (5th Cir. 1986) (en banc) (zoning is quasi-legislative action, and, therefore, zoning decisions need only have conceivable rational basis), cert. denied, *692 477 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 3276 , 91 L.Ed.2d 566 , 479 U.S. 822 , 107 S.Ct. 89 , 93 L.Ed.2d 4…
discussed
Cited "but see"
Elling O. Eide v. Sarasota County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida
(2×)
See Nectow v. City of Cambridge, 277 U.S. 183, 236 , 48 S.Ct. 447, 448 , 72 L.Ed. 842 (1928); Greenbriar v. City of Alabaster, 881 F.2d 1570, 1577 (11th Cir.1989); Stansberry v. Holmes, 613 F.2d 1285, 1289 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980); but see Shelton v. City of College Station, 780 F.2d 475, 482 (5th Cir.1986) (en banc) (zoning is quasi-legislative action, and, therefore, zoning decisions need only have conceivable rational basis), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 3276 , 91 L.Ed.2d 566 , 479 U.S. 822 , 107 S.Ct. 89 , 93 L.Ed.2d 41 (1986)…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bryan v. City of Madison, Miss.
See FM Properties Operating Company v. City of Austin, 93 F.3d 167, 173-74 (5th Cir.1996), citing Shelton v. City of College Station, 780 F.2d 475, 477 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 3276 , 91 L.Ed.2d 566 , and 479 U.S. 822 , 107 S.Ct. 89 , 93 L.Ed.2d 41 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Town of Sunnyvale v. Mayhew
See Shelton v. City of College Station, 780 F.2d 475, 479 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 3276 , 91 L.Ed.2d 566 , and cert. denied, 479 U.S. 822 , 107 S.Ct. 89 , 93 L.Ed.2d 41 (1986); Turtle Rock, 680 S.W.2d at 805 ; State v. Richards, 157 Tex. 166 , 301 S.W.2d 597, 602 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Irving Peters
See United States v. Brantley, 777 F.2d 159 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 822 , 107 S.Ct. 89 , 93 L.Ed.2d 42 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Merrill Benton v. United States of America and the United States Postal Service
See Grijalva v. United States, 781 F.2d 472, 473 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 822 , 107 S.Ct. 89 , 93 L.Ed.2d 42 (1986). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Rowell v. Board of Adjustment of City of Moorhead
See Shelton v. City of College Station, 780 F.2d 475, 485-86 (5th Cir.1986) (en bane) (church member not disqualified from voting on zoning matter opposed by church), cert, denied, 479 U.S. 822 , 107 S.Ct. 89 , 93 L.Ed.2d 41 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Ramiro Vilanova v. United States of America
See Grijalva v. United States, 781 F.2d 472, 474 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 822 , 107 S.Ct. 89 , 93 L.Ed.2d 42 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zapata v. Burns
Fujioka v. Kam, 55 Hawaii 7, 10-13 , 514 P.2d 568 (1973) (holding classification unreasonable in immunizing the engineer and contractor but not the owner); accord Tabler v. Wallace, 704 S.W.2d 179 , 189 (Ky. 1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 822 , 107 S. Ct. 89 , 93 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Sdj, Inc., D/B/A Sugar Babes v. The City of Houston
See Shelton v. City of College Station, 780 F.2d 475, 479 (5th Cir.1986) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 89 , 93 L.Ed.2d 41 (1986). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saltsman v. United States
See id.; see also Grijalva v. United States, 781 F.2d 472, 474-75 (5th Cir.)(under Woerth , FECA barred FTCA claim by daughter of injured employee for loss of support and services), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 822 , 107 S.Ct. 89 , 93 L.Ed.2d 42 (1986); Bates v. Harp, 573 F.2d 930 , 934 n. 2 (6th Cir.1978)(when FECA provides the exclusive remedy for an injured employee, the statute necessarily precludes recovery for a loss of consortium claim by the spouse of the employee); Pitt v. Matola, 890 F.Supp. 89, 94-95 (N.D.N.Y.1995)(FECA barred loss of consortium claim by husband of government employee inj…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Saltsman v. United States
See id.; see also Grijalva v. United States, 781 F.2d 472, 474-75 (5th Cir.) (under Woerth, FECA barred FTCA claim by daughter of injured employee for loss of support and services), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 822 , 107 S.Ct. 89 , 93 L.Ed.2d 42 (1986); Bates v. Harp, 573 F.2d 930 , 934 n. 2 (6th Cir.1978)(when FECA provides the exclusive remedy for an injured employee, the statute necessarily precludes recovery for a loss of consortium claim by the spouse of the employee); Pitt v. Matola, 890 F.Supp. 89, 94-95 (N.D.N.Y.1995)(FECA barred loss of consortium claim by husband of government employee inj…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grijalva
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-2000.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.