green
Positive treatment
8.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Reginald Jones v. J.O. Davis, Warden
But see Booker v. Jabe, 775 F.2d 762 (6th Cir.1985), vacated, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 3289 , 92 L.Ed.2d 705 reinstated on remand, 801 F.2d 871 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987); McCray v. Abrams, 750 F.2d 1113 (2d Cir.1984), vacated, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 3289 , 92 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986); United States v. Hardiman, 656 F.Supp. 1006 (N.D.Ill.1987). 18 This proof could be direct evidence such as testimony, or indirect evidence such as statistical proof.
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Cantu
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see Booker v. Jabe, 775 F.2d 762, 771-72 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987), where a single challenge may be insufficient to show a violation of a defendant’s sixth amendment rights.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Muriale
In view of the heterogeneous population of our Nation, public respect for our criminal justice system and the rule of law will be strengthened if we ensure that no citizen is disqualified from jury service because of his race.” (476 US, supra, at 99.) The court found that the injury from discrimination in the selection of the jury affects "the entire community.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dewey MacK Evans v. State
See Bailey v. State , 804 S.W.2d 226, 228 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 1991, no pet.) (citing Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986), cert. denied , 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dewey MacK Evans v. State
See Bailey v. State, 804 S.W .2d 226, 228 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 1991, no pet.) (citing Bell v. State, 724 S.W .2d 780 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dewey MacK Evans v. State
See Bailey v. State , 804 S.W.2d 226, 228 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 1991, no pet.) (citing Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986), cert. denied , 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Cox v. State
See Bailey v. State , 804 S.W.2d 226, 228 (Tex.App.–Amarillo 1991, no pet.) (citing Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986), cert. denied , 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987)).
cited
Cited "see"
James David Carter v. Ricky Bell, Warden Paul Summers, Attorney General
See State v. Carter, 714 S.W.2d 241 (Tenn.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Allen v. State
See Boyd v. State, 494 N.E.2d 284 (Ind.1986), cert. denied 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987). 12 D.
cited
Cited "see"
Hadnot v. State
See Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780, 787 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Daugherty
(2×)
See Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780, 787, 793 (Tex.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987); Dickey v. State, 716 S.W.2d 499, 505 (Tex.Cr.App.1986); Wicker v. State, 667 S.W.2d 137, 141-42 (Tex.Cr.App.), cert. denied, *279 469 U.S. 892 , 105 S.Ct. 268 , 83 L.Ed.2d 204 (1984); Vanderbilt v. State, 629 S.W.2d 709, 722-23 (Tex.Cr.App.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982); Pitts v. State, 614 S.W.2d 142 (Tex. Cr.App.1981); McMahon v. State, 582 S.W.2d 786 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Nicholas v. State, 502 S.W.2d 169 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); …
cited
Cited "see"
Small Business Administration v. Echevarria
See Hillburn v. Maher, 795 F.2d 252, 264 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 859 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
American Eagle Credit Corp. v. Select Holding, Inc.
See Hillburn v. Maher, 795 F.2d 252, 264 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 859 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Farmah v. State
(2×)
See Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780, 789 (Tex.Cr.App. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
McDuffie v. State
See Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780, 803 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987); Bogan v. State, 837 S.W.2d 422, 430 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1992, no pet.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hathorn v. State
See Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780, 795 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987); see also Demouchette v. State, 731 S.W.2d 75, 83 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 920 , 107 S.Ct. 3197 , 96 L.Ed.2d 685 (1987) (holding that to preserve error, a defendant must exhaust all of his peremptory challenges, he must be denied a request for additional challenges, and he must identify a member of the jury who is objectionable and who he would have struck with an additional peremptory challenge).
cited
Cited "see"
Anderson v. State
See Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780, 796 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cer t. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Dutton v. State
Andujo v. State, 755 S.W.2d 138, 144 (Tex.Crim.App.1988); see Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780, 803 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), ce rt. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Alvarado v. State
See Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780, 796 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cer t. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
James H. Bell, Jr. v. Dennis Baker
(2×)
See Booker v. Jabe, 801 F.2d 871 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Garcia v. State
(2×)
See Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780, 793 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986), cert. denied 479 U.S. 1046 . 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987); Dickey v. State, 716 S.W.2d 499, 505 (Tex.Crim.App. 1986); Wicker v. State, 667 S.W.2d 137, 141 (Tex.Crim.App. 1984); Vanderbilt v. State, 629 S.W.2d 709, 723 (Tex.Crim.App. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hicks v. State
(2×)
See Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780, 803 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987); (2) there was overwhelming evidence of appellant's guilt; (3) the jury was repeatedly instructed appellant had the right not to testify; and (4) there is no evidence the jury based its verdict of guilt on the fact appellant did not testify. 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Farmah v. State
(2×)
See Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780, 788-89 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Ramos v. State
See Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780, 802-803 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed. 2d 860 (1987); Brandley v. State, 691 S.W.2d 699, 712-13 (Tex.Crim.App.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Jimmy Royster v. Norris W. McMackin Supt.
See Booker v. Jabe, 775 F.2d 762 (6th Cir.1985), vacated and remanded, 106 S.Ct. 3289 , reinstated on remand, 801 F.2d 871 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 107 S.Ct. 910 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Hillburn v. Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Income Maintenance
See Heintz v. Hillburn, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 859 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Hillburn v. COM'R, CONN. DEPT. OF INCOME MAINT.
See Heintz v. Hillburn, ___ U.S. ___, 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 859 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Lindsey v. Fred Smith, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, J.D. White, Warden Holman Unit
(2×)
See Booker v. Jabe, 775 F.2d 762 (6th Cir.1985), vacated, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 3289 , 92 L.Ed.2d 705 , reinstated on remand, 801 F.2d 871 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987); McCray v. Abrams, 750 F.2d 1113 (2d Cir.1984), vacated, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 3289 , 92 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986). 10 We express no opinion whether Allen v. Hardy, supra, would preclude a fair cross-section challenge to a petit jury where the case had completed direct appeal prior to the Supreme Court's decision in Batson, supra, but where the claim could not have been raised…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hankins v. State
Compare Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780, 788-91 (Tex.Crim.App.1986)(concluding that one and a half to three hours before the first confession favored defendant but the passage of a day before the second confession favored the State), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DiPirro v. United States
George A. Fuller Co. v. Alexander & Reed, Esqs., 760 F.Supp. 381, 385 (S.D.N.Y.1991); Wright & Miller, supra at 495-502; see also Hillburn by Hillburn v. Maher, 795 F.2d 252, 264 (2d Cir.1986) (motion to amend pleadings to conform to evidence must be granted when issues have been tried with express or implied consent of parties), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 859 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cooks v. State
Id; see also Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780, 797 (Tex.Cr.App.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987); Anderson, 633 S.W.2d at 854 (denial of challenge for cause not error even when juror knew rape victim and witnesses); Esterline v. State, 707 S.W.2d 171, 175 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1986, pet. ref’d) (where juror stated that he could be fair and had not formed an opinion about guilt or innocence, the court did not err in overruling challenge for cause even though juror was a police officer and knew police officers who would be testifying at trial).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Glover v. State
Compare Bell v. State, 724 S.W.2d 780, 798-99 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1046 , 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 (1987).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ferrier v. State
Slone v. State (1986), Ind., 496 N.E.2d 401, 404 ; See also Boyd v. State (1986), Ind., 494 N.E.2d 284, 293 , cert. denied — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 910 , 93 L.Ed.2d 860 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michigan
v.
Booker
v.
Booker
No. 86-797.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1987.
Cited by 7 opinions | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Cer-tiorari denied.