green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Cindy Hatfield v. Allenbrooke Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC
See id. at 70–71 (quoting American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56, 57 (C.A.2), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988)) (“‘[I]t is entirely appropriate for directors of a parent corporation to serve as directors of its subsidiary, and that fact alone may not serve to expose the parent corporation to liability for its subsidiary’s acts.’ . . . [I]t cannot be enough to establish liability here that dual officers and directors made policy decisions and supervised activities at the facility.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maltz v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56, 60 (2d Cir.1988) (existence of interlocking directorates between a parent and a subsidiary is a “commonplace circumstance of modern business [that] does not furnish such proof of control as will permit a court to pierce the corporate veil”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988); Pits, 911 F.Supp. at 715 (same); 1 William Meade Fletcher, et al., Fletcher Cyclopedia of the Law of Private Corporations § 41.30, at 664 (1990 rev. ed.) (decision to pierce corporate veil may not rest on a single factor).
discussed
Cited "see"
Timex Corp. v. Stoller
See American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvò, 844 F.2d 56 (2d Cir.)(“A corporation is an entity that is created by law and endowed with a separate and distinct existence from that of its owners.”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Village on Canon v. Bankers Trust Co.
See American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56, 63-64 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988); Durante Bros. & Sons, Inc. v. Flushing Nat’l Bank, 755 F.2d 239, 252-53 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985); Frutico, S.A de C.V. v. Bankers Trust Co., 833 F.Supp. 288, 300 (S.D.N.Y. 1993), aff’d, 23 F.3d 396 (2d Cir.1994); Baroque Arabe v. Maryland Nat’l Bank, 819 F.Supp. 1282, 1293 (S.D.N.Y.1993) (“Under New York law, there is no cause of action for negligent misrepresentation ‘in the absence of a speci…
discussed
Cited "see"
Pacesetter Motors, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp.
See American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56, 63 (2d Cir.) (“an individual with an economic stake in the business of another may interfere with a contract that the other business has with a third person if the purpose is to protect the individual’s own stake”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Riddell Sports Inc. v. Brooks
See American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56, 63 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Campo v. 1st Nationwide Bank
See American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56, 60 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988); Zinaman v. USTS New York, Inc., 798 F.Supp. 128, 132 (S.D.N.Y.1992); Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, 82 N.Y.2d 135, 141 , 603 N.Y.S.2d 807, 810-11 , 623 N.E.2d 1157, 1160-62 (1993); Chase Manhattan Bank v. 264 Water Street Associates, 174 A.D.2d 504, 505 , 571 N.Y.S.2d 281, 282 (1st Dept.1991); Low-endahl v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., 247 A.D. 144, 157 , 287 N.Y.S. 62 (1st Dept.), aff'd, 272 N.Y. 360 , 6 N.E.2d 56 (1936).
cited
Cited "see"
Coultman v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
See American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56, 62 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frutico, S.A. de C.V. v. Bankers Trust Co.
See Babcock v. Jackson, 12 N.Y.2d 473, 482 , 240 N.Y.S.2d 743 , 191 N.E.2d 279 (1963); accord American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56, 63 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Thomson McKinnon Securities Inc.
See American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56, 62-63 (2d Cir.) (New York substantive law applied because acts constituting the alleged tort occurred in New York and New York corporation was implicated), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Congress Financial Corp. v. John Morrell & Co.
Accord American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56, 63-64 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Golden Distributors, Ltd. v. Auburn Merchandising Distributorship, Inc. (In Re Golden Distributors, Ltd.)
See American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56, 62-63 (2d Cir.) (New York substantive law applied because acts constituting the alleged tort occurred in New York and New York corporation was implicated), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd. Monterey-Del Monte Dunes Corporation v. City of Monterey
See Austin v. City and County of Honolulu, 840 F.2d 678, 679-80 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DeJesus v. R.P.M. Enterprises, Inc.
See Sellner v. Beechwood Construction Co., 176 Conn. 432, 433, 437 , 407 A.2d 1026 (1979) (jury returned verdict piercing corporate veil of defendant construc- tion company); see also American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56, 59 (2d Cir.) (rejecting claim that court should have decided piercing of corporate veil claim and holding that issue of piercing corporate veil ‘‘is generally submitted to the jury’’), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S. Ct. 136 , 102 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dimon Inc. v. Folium, Inc.
Id. (citing Coolite Corp. v. Amanean Cyanamid Co., 52 A.D.2d 486 , 384 N.Y.S.2d 808, 811 (1st Dept.1976)); see also American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56, 63 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988) (special relationship required for a negligent misrepresentation claim is one that “suggests a closer degree of trust and reliance than that of the ordinary buyer and seller”). 93 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ives v. Guilford Mills, Inc.
See also American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56, 63 (2d Cir.) (“an individual with an economic stake in the business of another may interfere with a contract that the other business has with a third person if the purpose is to protect the individual’s own stake”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Villager Pond, Inc. v. Town Of Darien
Moreover, relief under a state compensation procedure must be attempted even where it "remains unsure and undeveloped." Southview, 980 F.2d at 99; see also Austin v. City and County of Honolulu, 840 F.2d 678, 680-81 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Villager Pond, Inc. v. Town of Darien
Moreover, relief under a state compensation procedure must be attempted even where it “remains unsure and undeveloped.” Southview, 980 F.2d at 99; see also Austin v. City and County of Honolulu, 840 F.2d 678, 680-81 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Theodore A. Weston v. Peg Kernan, Warden
(2×)
See, e.g., Lovinger v. Circuit Court, 845 F.2d 739, 744 (7th Cir.) (holding that previously made mistrial motion did not constitute consent to a mistrial declared later on other grounds), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 851 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 108 (1988); United States v. Mastrangelo, 662 F.2d 946, 950 (2d Cir.1981) (defendant may withdraw motion for mistrial, even if withdrawal is not explicit), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 973 , 102 S.Ct. 2236 , 72 L.Ed.2d 847 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Norman P. Singer v. Thomas F. Dungan Benjamin Flammey the Cambridge Institute, Incorporated
See also American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56, 61-62 (2d Cir.) (stating that a failure to renew a motion for judgment as a matter of law will not preclude review of the sufficiency of the evidence if the trial court indicated that such a motion was not necessary to preserve the motion and if the nonmovant reasonably believed it could rest on its evidence), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988); Bohrer v. Hanes Corp., 715 F.2d 213, 217 (5th Cir.1983) (excusing the defendant’s failure to comply with Rule 50(b) procedure given that the district court st…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People Ex Rel. Maula v. Freckleton
"A precipitate decision, reflected by a rapid sequence of events culminating in a declaration of a mistrial, would tend to indicate insufficient concern for the defendant’s constitutional protection.” Brady v. Samaha, 667 F.2d 224, 229 (1st Cir.1981); see also Lovinger v. Circuit Court of 19th Judicial Dist., 845 F.2d 739, 745-746 (7th Cir.) (court refused to find manifest necessity where judge made no record, did not consult with counsel and appeared to declare a mistrial in a rash fashion), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 851 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 108 (1988). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re the Arbitration Between Holborn Oil Trading Ltd. & Interpetrol Bermuda Ltd.
See, e.g., American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988); Gorrill v. Icelandair/Flugleidir, 761 F.2d 847 (2d Cir.1985). 3 In contrast, plaintiff contests the applicability of New York law because this Court is sitting in admiralty rather than diversity.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Carte Blanche (Singapore) PTE., Ltd. v. Diners Club International, Inc.
See, e.g., American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 852 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Dixon A/K/A Willie MacK Dick and Big Brother, Richard Hopkins and Gerald Hopkins-Bey, Intervenors. United States of America v. Nathaniel Williams A/K/A Nate, United States of America v. Donald Lewis, United States of America v. Johnnie Dentman A/K/A Ace, United States of America v. Delores Bennett, United States of America v. Noble Bennett A/K/A Turtle A/K/A Little Brother
See, e.g., Lovinger v. Circuit Court, 845 F.2d 739, 745 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 851 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 108 (1988); Grandberry v. Bonner, 653 F.2d 1010, 1015 (5th Cir.1981); Parker v. United States, 507 F.2d 587, 589 (8th Cir.1974) (Parker ), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 916 , 95 S.Ct. 1576 , 43 L.Ed.2d 782 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dixon
See, e.g., Lovinger v. Circuit Court, 845 F.2d 739, 745 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 851 , 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 108 (1988); Grandberry v. Bonner, 653 F.2d 1010, 1015 (5th Cir.1981); Parker v. United States, 507 F.2d 587, 589 (8th Cir.1974) [Parker), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 916 , 95 S.Ct. 1576 , 43 L.Ed.2d 782 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Camden v. Circuit Court
Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667, 679 , 102 S.Ct. 2083, 2091 , 72 L.Ed.2d 416 (1982); see also Lovinger v. Circuit Court of the 19th Judicial Circuit, 845 F.2d 739, 743 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 108 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Camden v. Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit
Oregon v. Kennedy, 456 U.S. 667, 679 , 102 S.Ct. 2083, 2091 , 72 L.Ed.2d 416 (1982); see also Lovinger v. Circuit Court of the 19th Judicial Circuit, 845 F.2d 739, 743 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 108 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
CL-Alexanders Laing & Cruickshank v. Goldfeld
See, e.g., American Protein Corp. v. AB Volvo, 844 F.2d 56, 62-63 (2d Cir.) (applying New York law where defendant was New York resident and “many of the alleged misrepresentations originated in New York”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 136 , 102 L.Ed.2d 109 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
American Protein Corp.
v.
AB Volvo
v.
AB Volvo
No. 88-109.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.