green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.8 score
“redict . . . that the new jersey supreme court would confine the tort of unlawful retaliation to formal personnel actions that have an effect on either compensation or job rank. . . .”
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re Flying Boat, Inc.
(2×)
But see In re Iowa Railroad Co., 840 F.2d 535 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S.Ct. 244 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Parker Motor Freight, Inc. v. Fifth Third Bank
(2×)
But see In re Iowa Railroad Co., 840 F.2d 535 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S.Ct. 244 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Beasley v. Passaic County
redict . . . that the new jersey supreme court would confine the tort of unlawful retaliation to formal personnel actions that have an effect on either compensation or job rank. . . .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hancock v. Borough of Oaklyn
predict ... that the new jersey supreme court would confine the tort of unlawful retaliation to formal personnel actions that have an effect on either compensation or job rank....
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Paul Versarge v. The Township of Clinton New Jersey Annandale Hose Company No. 1, a New Jersey Corporation William Faust, III
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
The law in this circuit is that “motivation is ‘merely one factor to be considered, but [is] not necessarily controlling, in assessing the character of [the employee’s] speech.’ ” Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F.2d 73, 78 (3d Cir.) (quoting Rode v. Dellarciprete, 845 F.2d 1195, 1201 (3d Cir.1988)), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109-S. Ct. 245, 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ivan v. County of Middlesex
See Hancock v. Borough of Oaklyn, 347 N.J.Super. 350, 360 , 790 A.2d 186 (App.Div.2002) (citing Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F.2d 73, 82-83 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S.Ct. 245 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cuffeld v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
See Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F.2d 73, 77-78 (3d Cir.1988) (holding that the complaints of a public employee about a reorganization plan were on a matter of public concern even though the employee was primarily motivated by the adverse effect of the plan on himself), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S.Ct. 245 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Swineford v. Snyder County
See Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F.2d 73, 77 (3d Cir.) (civil service employee's criticism of county prosecutor's reorganization and promotion plan) cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S.Ct. 245 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988); Rode v. Dellarciprete, 845 F.2d 1195, 1201 (3d Cir.1988) (state police civilian employee communication to reporter alleging speaker was harassed because of racial animus); Czurlanis, 721 F.2d at 104 (county auto mechanic's criticism of internal management of Department of Motor Vehicles); Trotman, 635 F.2d at 225 (professor's criticism of university president's efforts to increase fac…
discussed
Cited "see"
Swineford v. Snyder County Pennsylvania
See Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F.2d 73, 77 (3d Cir.) (civil service employee’s criticism of county prosecutor’s reorganization and promotion plan) cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S.Ct. 245 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988); Rode v. Dellarciprete, 845 F.2d 1195, 1201 (3d Cir.1988) (state police civilian employee communication to reporter alleging speaker was harassed because of racial animus); Czurlanis, 721 F.2d at 104 (county auto mechanic’s criticism of internal management of Department of Motor Vehicles); Trotman, 635 F.2d at 225 (professor’s criticism of university president’s efforts to in…
cited
Cited "see"
Morgan v. Union County
See Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F. 2d 73, 80 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S.Ct. 245 , 102 L.Ed. 2d 233 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patrick J. O'COnnOr v. Robert W. Steeves
See Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F.2d 73, 78 (3d Cir.) ("[w]cre motivation rather than content dispositive [in Con-nick\, the Court would have had no reason to isolate the one question that was of public concern”), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S.Ct. 245 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
(2×)
See In re Iowa R.R., 840 F.2d 535, 545 (7th Cir.) (railway has only an unsecured debt in interline charges collected by bankrupt railway), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 244 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
(2×)
See In re Iowa R.R., 840 F.2d 535, 545 (7th Cir.) (railway has only an unsecured debt in interline charges collected by bankrupt railway), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 244 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martin F. Hogan
See United States v. Garner, 837 F.2d 1404, 1412 (7th Cir.1987), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 2022 , 100 L.Ed.2d 608 , -U.S. —-, 108 S.Ct. 2914 , 101 L.Ed.2d 945 , — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 244 , 102 L.Ed.2d 232 (1988); see also United States v. Lane, 474 U.S. 438, 447 , 106 S.Ct. 725, 731 , 88 L.Ed.2d 814 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
O'donnell v. Yanchulis
See Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F.2d 73, 76 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 245 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
O'Donnell v. Yanchulis
See Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F.2d 73, 76 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 245 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Elson
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Robinson, 14 Conn. App. 40 , 539 A.2d 606 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S. Ct. 244 , 102 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shovlin v. University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey
Moreover, while it is not determinative, “the speaker’s motivation is relevant to the extent that it indicates whether the speaker is speaking as ‘a citizen upon matters of public concern’ or as a volunteer ‘upon matters only of personal interest.’ ” Versarge v. Township of Clinton N.J., 984 F.2d 1359, 1365 (3d Cir.1993)(quoting Connick, 461 U.S. at 147 , 103 S.Ct. 1684 ); see also Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F.2d 73, 77-78 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S.Ct. 245 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McIntyre v. Guild, Inc.
Whether the speech is on a matter of public concern is a question of law for the court, to be determined “by the content, form, and context of a given statement.” Connick, 461 U.S. at 147 -48 & n. 7, 103 S.Ct. at 1690 & n. 7; See also Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F.2d 73, 77 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S.Ct. 245 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Watters v. City of Philadelphia
See Johnson v. Lincoln University, 776 F.2d 443 , 454 (3d Cir.1985) ("second and third questions ... should be submitted to the jury"); see also Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F.2d 73 , 79 n. 6, 80 (3d Cir.) ("these inquiries [whether a substantial or motivating factor and whether same actions would have been taken regardless] ... are for the jury"), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S.Ct. 245 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988) 4 In Gomez v. Texas Dep't of Mental Health & Mental Retardation, 794 F.2d 1018 (5th Cir.1986), the speech was that of an employee at a state facility for the mentally ill who informed an…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Watters v. City of Philadelphia
See Johnson v. Lincoln University, 776 F.2d 443, 454 (3d Cir.1985) ("second and third questions ... should be submitted to the jury”); see also Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F.2d 73 , 79 n. 6, 80 (3d Cir.) (“these inquiries [whether a substantial or motivating factor and whether same actions would have been taken regardless] ... are for the jury”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S.Ct. 245 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burns v. County of Cambria
See Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); see also Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F.2d 73 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S.Ct. 245 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eugene Burns v. County Of Cambria
See Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); see also Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F.2d 73 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S.Ct. 245 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Iovieno v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
Ed. 2d 1361 (1982) . . . .” Gaines v. Manson, 194 Conn. 510, 516 , 481 A.2d 1084 (1984); see also State v. Robinson, 10 Conn. App. 520, 523 , 523 A.2d 1365 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 807 , 528 A.2d 1154 (1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S. Ct. 244 , 102 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kemp v. State Board of Agriculture
(2×)
See also Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F.2d 73, 77-78 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899 , 109 S.Ct. 245 , 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988) (employee's speech touched upon public concern even though his sole purpose was to invalidate a promotional plan adverse to him); Rode v. Dellarciprete, 845 F.2d 1195, 1202 (3d Cir.1988) ("Dismissing Rode's speech as unprotected merely because she had a personal stake in the controversy fetters public debate on an important issue because it muzzles an affected public employee from speaking out."); Wren v. Spurlock, 798 F.2d 1313, 1317 (10th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
v.
Moritz, Trustee of Iowa Railroad Co.
v.
Moritz, Trustee of Iowa Railroad Co.
No. 88-93.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1988.
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari de-
nied.
Justice White would grant certiorari.