green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jim Guy Tucker
(2×)
See Remmer, 347 U.S. at 230 , 74 S.Ct. at 450-51 ; Rushen v. Spain, 464 U.S. 114, 119-20 , 104 S.Ct. 453, 456 , 78 L.Ed.2d 267 (1983) (per curiam); Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209, 215 , 102 S.Ct. 940, 945 , 71 L.Ed.2d 78 (1982); see generally United States v. Madrid, 842 F.2d 1090, 1093-94 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 912 , 109 S.Ct. 269 , 102 L.Ed.2d 256, 257 (1988); 26 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 633.07[1] and n. 3 (Matthew Bender 3d ed.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dilbeck v. State
See United States v. Madrid , 842 F.2d 1090 , 1092 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 912 , 109 S.Ct. 269 , 102 L.Ed.2d 256 , 257 (1988); Nebraska v. Press Ass'n v. Stuart , 427 U.S. 539 , 555 , 96 S.Ct. 2791 , 2801 , 49 L.Ed.2d 683 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Clarence D. Ross
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Madrid, 842 F.2d 1090, 1092 (9th Cir.) (“substantial weight” is accorded to the trial judge’s conclusion regarding juror misconduct), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 269 , 102 L.Ed.2d 256 (1988); United States v. Cawley, 630 F.2d 1345, 1348 (9th Cir.1980) (according “great deference” to the trial judge’s decision whether to declare a mistrial due to a deadlocked jury “because the trial judge is in the best position to assess the relevant facts”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Madamba
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 88-5476.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 1988.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.