green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Lewis v. United States
But cf. United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1501, 1506 (7th Cir.1989) (warrantless search of vehicle which police officers followed before they initiated contact with appellants, which was after appellants had pulled over and parked it, held valid as incident to subsequent arrest one block away), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1111 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990). 8 .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Shoemaker v. GAF Corp.
while a statute's legislative history is often helpful in resolving ambiguity, one of the time-honored maxims of statutory construction is that when the language of a statute is clear, there is no need to rely on its legislative history.
discussed
Cited "see"
Alt v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See First United Methodist Church v. United States Gypsum Co., 882 F.2d 862, 869 (4th Cir.1989) (stating that common sense is the “most fundamental guide to statutory construction”), cert denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1113 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1990); Sutton v. United States, 819 F.2d 1289, 1292 (5th Cir.1987) (stating that the courts have a duty to construe the language in a statute consistent with its plain meaning); The King v. Inhabitants of St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Burns v. Bechtel Corp.
See First United Methodist Church v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 882 F.2d 862 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1113 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1990); In re Personal Injury Asbestos Cases, Circuit Court for Baltimore City (Levin, J., November 1, 1989); Baltimore County, Maryland v. Keene Corp. et. al., Circuit Court for Baltimore County, Case No. 84-CG-1776 (Fader, J., April 12, 1988); State of Maryland v. Keene Corp. et. al., Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, Civil Action No. 11-8600 (Thieme, J., June 9, 1989); Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Keene Corp. et. al., Circuit Court…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Banks
See United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1501 , 1507 n. 2 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1111 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990) (holding that even if search revealing trap was not justified as search incident to arrest, it was justified as a lawful inventory search); United States v. Lomeli, No. 94 CR 173-1, 1995 WL 248039 , *2, 1995 U.S.Dist.
examined
Cited "see"
Joyce v. Garnaas
(4×)
See First United Methodist Church of Hyattsville v. United States Gypsum Co. (4th Cir.1989), 882 F.2d 862, 866 , cert. denied (1990), 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1113 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1020 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Blackburn v. Blue Mountain Women's Clinic
(2×)
See First United Methodist Church of Hyattsville v. United States Gypsum Co. (4th Cir. 1989), 882 F.2d 862, 866 , cert. denied (1990), 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S. Ct. 1113 , 107 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Blue v. Bigos
See United States v. West, 877 F.2d 281, 293 (4th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 869 (1989), and 493 U.S. 959 (1989), and 493 U.S. 1070 (1990); United States v. Allen, 561 F.2d 557, 559 (4th Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blue v. Bigos
See United States v. West, 877 F.2d 281, 293 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 869 (1989), and 493 U.S. 959 (1989), and 493 U.S. 1070 (1990); United States v. Allen, 561 F.2d 557, 559 (4th Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Browner
See Nevada v. Skinner, 884 F.2d 445, 448 (9th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Browner
(2×)
See Nevada v. Skinner, 884 F.2d 445, 448 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1112 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Browner
(2×)
See Nevada v. Skinner, 884 F.2d 445, 448 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1112 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990). 71 The highway sanction here does not rise to the level of "outright coercion." First, a state does not lose any highway funds that would be spent in areas of the state that are in attainment.
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Mo. v. United States
(2×)
See Nevada v. Skinner, 884 F.2d 445 (9th Cir.1989) ("The coercion theory has been much discussed but infrequently applied in federal case law, and never in favor of the challenging party.") (citations omitted), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1112 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Missouri v. United States
(2×)
See Nevada v. Skinner, 884 F.2d 445 (9th Cir.1989) (“The coercion theory has been much discussed but infrequently applied in federal case law, and never in favor of the challenging party.”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1112 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adams v. Zimmerman
(2×)
See Downriver Community Federal Credit Union v. Penn Square Bank through FDIC, 879 F.2d 754, 758 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1112 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adams v. Zimmerman
See ___ Downriver Community Federal Credit Union v. Penn Square Bank _________________________________________ ________________ through FDIC, 879 F.2d 754 , 758 (10th Cir. 1989), cert. _____________ _____ denied, 493 U.S. 1070 (1990). ______ A. Ratable Distribution ____________________ The FDIC, as receiver, is authorized to distribute the assets of a failed bank to all creditors on a pro rata basis pursuant to the National Bank Act at 12 U.S.C. 91 and 194, and the FIRREA at 12 U.S.C. 1821(i)(2).8 See ___ also United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Levi C. Adams v. Zimmerman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Levi C. Adams v. Zimmerman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Levi C. Adams v. Zimmerman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Levi C. Adams v. Zimmerman
(2×)
See Downriver Community Federal Credit Union v. Penn Square Bank through FDIC, 879 F.2d 754 , 758 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1112 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Savedra
See United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1501, 1506 (7th Cir.1989) (finding search of vehicle valid where defendant had left car moments before confrontation with police began), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1111 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990); United States v. Schecter, 717 F.2d 864, 868 (3d Cir.1983) (applying Belton where police contacted defendant stumbling outside his car under the influence of drugs shortly after he had driven it into a fence); People v. Stoffle, 1 Cal.App.4th 1671 , 3 Cal.Rptr.2d 257, 261 (1991) (holding Belton applicable where police contacted and arrested defendant…
discussed
Cited "see"
Patten v. Board of Liquor License Commissioners
See generally First United Methodist Church of Hyattsville v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 882 F.2d 862, 869 (1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1113 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1990) (stating that the most fundamental guide to statutory construction is common sense).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lorenzo Kofa v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law American Immigration Lawyers Association Legal Action Center of the American Immigration Law Foundation National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild, Amici Curiae. Jorge Samuel Moreno v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See First United Methodist Church v. United States Gypsum Co., 882 F.2d 862, 869 (4th Cir.1989) (stating that common sense is the "most fundamental guide to statutory construction"), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1113 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1990); Sutton v. United States, 819 F.2d 1289, 1292 (5th Cir.1987) (stating that the courts have a duty to construe the language in a statute consistent with its plain meaning); The King v. Inhabitants of St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kofa v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See First United Methodist Church v. United States Gypsum Co., 882 F.2d 862, 869 (4th Cir.1989) (stating that common sense is the “most fundamental guide to statutory construction”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1113 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1990); Sutton v. United States, 819 F.2d 1289, 1292 (5th Cir.1987) (stating that the courts have a duty to construe the language in a statute consistent with its plain meaning); The King v. Inhabitants of St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Taydus v. Cisneros
See generally Davis Enterprises v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 877 F.2d 1181, 1184-1186 (3rd Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1113 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1990) (recognizing that absence of express statutory limits on agency discretion does not necessarily preclude judicial review).
discussed
Cited "see"
Virginia v. United States
(2×)
See Nevada v. Skinner, 884 F.2d 445, 448 (9th Cir.1989) (“the difficulty if not the impropriety of making judicial judgments regarding a state’s financial capabilities renders the coercion theory highly suspect as method for resolving disputes between federal and state governments”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1112 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pennsylvania Funeral Directors Association, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 , 91 S.Ct. 814, 823-24 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971); see Davis Enterprises v. EPA, 877 F.2d 1181 , 1186 (3d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1113 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
PA Funeral Dir. Assn. v. FTC
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971); see Davis Enterprises v. EPA, 877 F.2d 1181 , 1186 (3d Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rose v. Fox Pool Corp.
(2×)
See First United Methodist Church v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 882 F.2d 862, 865 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1113 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1990); J.H.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Recalcitrant Witness Richard Boeh, Julia Gomez v. Daryl Gates, and United States of America
(2×)
See Davis Enterprises v. EPA, 877 F.2d 1181 , 1184-88 (3rd Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1113 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1990); Appeal of the Sun Pipe Line Co., 831 F.2d 22, 24-26 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1055 , 108 S.Ct. 2821 , 100 L.Ed.2d 922 (1988); see also Swett, 792 F.2d at 1452 n. 2 (suggesting that the proper method for challenging an agency's denial of permission is through a direct APA action).
discussed
Cited "see"
A.S.I., Inc. v. Sanders
See First United Methodist Church v. United States Gypsum, 882 F.2d 862 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1113 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1990) (CERCLA not applicable in action to recover removal costs of asbestos from interior of building); Covalt v. Carey Canada, Inc., 860 F.2d 1434 (7th Cir.1988) (CERCLA not applicable because plaintiffs exposure to asbestos in the workplace not the result of a release into the environment); Knox v. AC & S, Inc., 690 F.Supp. 752 (S.D.Ind.1988); Electric Power Bd. v. Westinghouse Electric, 716 F.Supp. 1069 (E.D.Tenn.1988), aff'd, 879 F.2d 1368…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gail Fuller, United States of America v. Margaret Dike Dureke, United States of America v. Beatrice Azauka, United States of America v. David Fuller
See United States v. West, 877 F.2d 281, 289 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 869 , and cert. denied, 493 U.S. 959 (1989), and cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 (1990); United States v. Crockett, 813 F.2d 1310, 1316-17 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 834 (1987) (adopting findings of district court); United States v. Dorta, 783 F.2d 1179, 1183 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 905 (1986). 33 D.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Peter Russell
See United States v. West, 877 F.2d 281, 291 (4th Cir.1989) (Allen charge claim rejected on grounds, inter alia, that jury deliberated for two hours following charge), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 869 , 110 S.Ct. 195 , 107 L.Ed.2d 149 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 959 , 110 S.Ct. 377 , 107 L.Ed.2d 362 (1989), and cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1113 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1990); United States v. Martin, 756 F.2d 323, 327 (4th Cir.1985) {en banc) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
Otis Leroy Thompson v. R.E. Lee, Attorney General of North Carolina
See United States v. West, 877 F.2d 281 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 58 U.S.L.W. 3526 (U.S.1990); United States v. Gallop, 838 F.2d 105 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1211 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Garcia
United States v. White, 871 F.2d 41, 43-44 (6th Cir.1989); United States v. Karlin, 852 F.2d 968, 970-72 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1021 , 109 S.Ct. 1142 , 103 L.Ed.2d 202 (1989); State v. Hensel, 417 N.W.2d 849 (N.D.1988); see United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1501, 1505-07 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1111 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Gallman
See United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1501, 1507 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1111 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990); Boden, supra; Rivera, supra. See also United States v. Pace, 898 F.2d 1218, 1243-1244 (7th Cir.1990) (dicta).
discussed
Cited "see"
Black v. Carey Canada, Inc.
See First United Methodist Church of Hyattsville v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 882 F.2d 862 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1113 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1990); Covalt v. Carey Canada, Inc., 860 F.2d 1434 (7th Cir.1988); Retirement Community Developers, Inc. v. Merine, 713 F.Supp. 153 (D.Md.1989); Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. U.S. Gypsum, 711 F.Supp. 1244 (D.N.J.1989); Knox v. A.C. & S., Inc., 690 F.Supp. 752 (S.D.Ind.1988); 3550 Stevens Creek Associates v. Barclays Bank of California, No. C-87-20672-RPA (unpublished slip op., N.D.Cal., Sept. 28, 1988); Corporation of Mercer…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Greco v. United Technologies Corp.
The text [of the statutory scheme] makes more sense if read to refer to more widespread releases that affect strangers . . . .” Id., 1436-37 ; see also First United Methodist Church of Hyattsville v. United States Gypsum Co., 882 F.2d 862, 869 (4th Cir. 1989) (CERCLA does not apply to action to recover cost of removing asbestos from interior of building), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S. Ct. 1113 , 107 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gass
See, e.g., Eggleston v. Colorado, 873 F.2d 242, 248 (10th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lewis v. Weldotron Corp.
Id. at 374, 643 A.2d at 917 ; see also First United Methodist Church v. United States Gypsum Co., 882 F.2d 862, 865 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1113 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Real Property, Buildings, Appurtenances & Improvements Located at 221 Dana Avenue
(2×)
See, e.g., Eggleston v. Colorado, 873 F.2d 242, 248 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1112 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
VILLALBA
Matter of Garcia-Flores, 17 I&N Dec. 325 (BIA 1980); see also Matter of Santos, 19 I&N Dec. 105 (BIA 1984). 848 Interim Decision #3310 Church of Hyattsville v. United States Gypsum Co., 882 F.2d 862, 869 (4th Cir.) (holding that a fundamental guide to statutory construction is common sense), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth of VA v. Riley
As we observed earlier this year, however, "[n]o court . . . has ever struck down a federal statute on grounds that it exceeded the Spend- ing Power." Commonwealth of Virginia v. Browner, ___ F.3d ___, 1996 WL 138507 , at *9 (4th Cir. Mar. 26, 1996); see also State of Nevada v. Skinner, 884 F.2d 445, 448 (9th Cir. 1989) ("The coercion theory has been much discussed but infrequently applied in federal case law, and never in favor of the challenging party."), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Education v. Richard W. Riley
(2×)
As we observed earlier this year, however, "[n]o court ... has ever struck down a federal statute on grounds that it exceeded the Spending Power." Commonwealth of Virginia v. Browner, 80 F.3d 869, 881 (4th Cir.1996); see also State of Nevada v. Skinner, 884 F.2d 445, 448 (9th Cir.1989) ("The coercion theory has been much discussed but infrequently applied in federal case law, and never in favor of the challenging party."), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1112 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hutching(James)
See Eggleston v. Colorado, 873 F.2d 242, 247 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Education v. Riley
(2×)
As we observed earlier this year, however, “[n]o court ... has ever struck down a federal statute on grounds that it exceeded the Spending Power.” Commonwealth of Virginia v. Browner, 80 F.3d 869, 881 (4th Cir. 1996); see also State of Nevada v. Skinner, 884 F.2d 445, 448 (9th Cir.1989) (“The coercion theory has been much discussed but infrequently applied in federal case law, and never in favor of the challenging party.”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1112 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Poe
United States v. Jackson, 757 F.2d 1486, 1491 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 994 (1985); see also United States v. West, 877 F.2d 281, 293 (4th Cir.) (absent sur- prise there is no abuse of discretion in trial court's denial of a motion 3 for particulars), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 869 , and 493 U.S. 959 (1989), and 493 U.S. 1070 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mark Christopher Poe
United States v. Jackson, 757 F.2d 1486, 1491 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 994 (1985); see also United States v. West, 877 F.2d 281, 293 (4th Cir.) (absent surprise there is no abuse of discretion in trial court's denial of a motion for particulars), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 869 , and 493 U.S. 959 (1989), and 493 U.S. 1070 (1990). 8 Even though the indictment did not provide the exact time of day or the precise location on the naval base that the offense occurred, it did provide sufficient notice to prepare a proper defense, and was of sufficient specificity to be used as proof to bar a su…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Lyle Pierce
Compare United States v. Russo, 741 F.2d 1264, 1267 (11th Cir.1984) (where neither party caused the delay, the presumption is for dismissal with prejudice) with United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1601 , 1608 (7th Cir.1989) (where neither party caused the delay/ the presumption is for dismissal without prejudice), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1111 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Real Property including any Buildings, Appurtenances, & Improvements thereon, located at 4446 East Broadway Avenue
(2×)
See Eggleston v. Colorado, 873 F.2d 242 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1112 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990); In the Case of One 1985 Nissan 300ZX, 889 F.2d 1317 (4th Cir.1989) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Erickson
See, e.g., United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1501, 1505-06 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1069 , 110 S.Ct. 1111 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990); United States v. Karlin, 852 F.2d 968, 970-72 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1021 , 109 S.Ct. 1142 , 103 L.Ed.2d 202 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Theodore K. Gale
The drugs removed from appellant’s person and automobile trunk would certainly have been discovered when the police searched his person incident to his arrest, see United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218, 236 , 94 S.Ct. 467, 477 , 38 L.Ed.2d 427 (1973) (war-rantless search of person valid when incident to custodial arrest), and his car pursuant to a post-impoundment inventory search, see South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364, 372 , 96 S.Ct. 3092, 3099 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1976) (upholding warrantless inventory search of lawfully impounded car); see also United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1501 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. a Single Family Residence Located at 3181 S.W. 138th Place
(2×)
See Eggleston v. Colorado, 873 F.2d 242 (10th Cir. 1989), cert. denied 493 U.S. 1070 , 110 S.Ct. 1112 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1990); In the Case of One 1985 Nissan, 300ZX, 889 F.2d 1317 (4th Cir.1989) (en banc); but see U.S. v. A Parcel of Land, 937 F.2d 98 (3rd Cir.1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nevada
v.
Skinner, Secretary of Transportation
v.
Skinner, Secretary of Transportation
No. 89-696.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1990.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: W.D. Virginia (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.