green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.3 score
“redacted statement in which the names of co-defendants are replaced by neutral pronouns, with no indication to the jury that the original statement contained actual names ... may be admitted without violating a codefendant's bruton rights.”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Figueroa v. Portuondo
redacted statement in which the names of co-defendants are replaced by neutral pronouns, with no indication to the jury that the original statement contained actual names ... may be admitted without violating a codefendant's bruton rights.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kampitch v. Lach
Even BellSouth recognized that "a litigant’s freedom to hire the lawyer of his choice can be overridden if a court finds that the choice would interfere with the orderly administration of justice.” BellSouth, 334 F.3d at 956 ; see generally Panzardi-Alvarez v. United States, 879 F.2d 975, 980 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, *215 493 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Collier v. United States
See United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1136 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Smith
App. at 373 ; see United States v. Gilbert, 884 F.2d 454, 457 (9th Cir. 1989) (defining “threat” as an expression of *49 intention to inflict evil, injury, or damage on another), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harmon
See Panzardi-Alvarez v. United States, 879 F.2d 975, 984 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1990) (noting that “it is insufficient to rely on ‘clashes between court and counsel’ as the basis of a disqualification motion”); Davis v. Board of Sch.
cited
Cited "see"
Tompkins v. Cyr
See United States v. Gilbert, *676 884 F.2d 454, 457 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Devery
See United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1140 (2d Cir.1989) (the scope and extent of cross-examination lie within the district court’s discretion, the exercise of which is guided by Rule 611),’ cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990); United States v. Bari, 750 F.2d 1169, 1178-79 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1019 , 105 S.Ct. 3482 , 87 L.Ed.2d 617 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wagner
See U.S. v. Gilbert, 813 F.2d 1523, 1529 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990). 12.
cited
Cited "see"
Torres-Lopez v. United States
See id. ___ ___ The judgment of the district court is affirmed. ________ -3-
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Aulicino, Jr., David Cleary, and Louis Ruggiero, Jr.
(2×)
Such a charge is appropriate where the defendant claims to lack “some specific aspect of knowledge necessary to conviction but where the evidence may be construed as deliberate ignorance.” United States v. Lanza, 790 F.2d 1015, 1022 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 861 , 107 S.Ct. 211 , 93 L.Ed.2d 141 (1986); see United States v. Mang Sun Wong, 884 F.2d 1537, 1541 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1990); United States v. Civelli 883 F.2d 191, 194-95 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 966 , 110 S.Ct. 409 , 107 L.Ed.2d 374 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Clemente v. United States
See Panzardi-Alvarez v. United States, ___ ________________ _____________ 879 F.2d 975, 985 (1st Cir. 1989) (there is nothing per se ___ __ wrong with the sentencing judge reviewing a 2255 petition), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 (1990); see also Liteky v. United ____________ ________ ______ ______ States, 114 S. Ct. 1147, 1155 (1994) (a judge is not ______ recusable because he has formed an opinion of the case based on information acquired while presiding over it, unless his opinion is so extreme as to display clear inability to render fair judgment); McGill, 11 F.3d at 226 (a district judge ma…
discussed
Cited "see"
Clemente v. United States
See Panzardi-Alvarez v. United States, 879 F.2d 975, 985 (1st Cir. 1989) (there is nothing per se wrong with the sentencing judge reviewing a Sec. 2255 petition), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 (1990); see also Liteky v. United States, 114 S. Ct. 1147, 1155 (1994) (a judge is not recusable because he has formed an opinion of the case based on information acquired while presiding over it, unless his opinion is so extreme as to display clear inability to render fair judgment); McGill, 11 F.3d at 226 (a district judge may rely upon his memory of earlier proceedings in ruling on a Sec. 2255 motion). …
discussed
Cited "see"
Ortiz Torres v. United States
See Panzardi-Alvarez v. United States, 879 F.2d 975 (1st Cir. 1989) (citing Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 57-59 (1985)), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 (1990). 9 Appellant's proof on the first prong is inadequate.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Basil Kyles and Geoffrey Kyles
See United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1135 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vittorio Amuso, Also Known as Jesse, Also Known as Vic
(2×)
See United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1132 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990); United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359, 1365 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruce Roy Lee
See United States v. Gilbert, 884 F.2d 454, 457 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Capozziello
See United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1139 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Evangelista
See United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125 , 1135 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990); United States v. Benitez, 920 F.2d 1080, 1087 (2d Cir. 1990); United States v. Smith, 918 F.2d 1032, 1038 (2d Cir. 1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1086 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1191 (1991); United States v. Alvarado, 882 F.2d 645, 652 (2d Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1071 , 110 S.Ct. 1114 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1990). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Taveras
See United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1140 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maurice Isabel v. United States
See Panzardi-Alvarez v. United States, 879 F.2d 975, 983 (1st Cir.1989) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2065 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maurice Isabel v. United States
See Panzardi-Alvarez v. United States, 879 F.2d 975 , ___ ________________ _____________ 983 (1st Cir. 1989) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. __________ ___________ 668, 689 (1984)), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Howard Morris, United States v. Rafael Tormes-Ortiz
See United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990) (it was not coercive for agent to advise owner of house being searched that agents were in the process of obtaining a search warrant); United States v. Whitworth, 856 F.2d 1268 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1084 , 109 S.Ct. 1541 , 103 L.Ed.2d 846 (1989) (officer's statement indicating that a search warrant would likely be sought and the mobile home secured could not have, by itself, rendered defendant’s consent involuntary as a matter of law).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ojiabo Onumonu
See United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1134 (2d Cir.1989), cert, denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brewer
See United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1141 (2d Cir.1989) (single narcotics count charging two sales), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990); United States v. Margiotta, 646 F.2d 729, 733 (2d Cir.1981) (single count of mail fraud alleging 50 mailings), ce rt. denied, 461 U.S. 913 , 103 S.Ct. 1891 , 77 L.Ed.2d 282 (1983); United States v. Girard, 601 F.2d 69, 72 (2d Cir.) (single count alleging unauthorized sale of official DEA records on four individuals), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871 , 100 S.Ct. 148 , 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Amable Garcia, Miguel Cabrera, Jose Domingo, Carlos Reinoso, Jose Dominguez, A/K/A \Jose Domingo\"
See United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1136 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Gonzalez v. Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility
See United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125 (2d Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Terrance Anderson
See United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1138 (2d Cir.1989) (“Once Tutino had been advised of his rights, the agents were free to discuss with him the evidence against him and the reasons why he should cooperate.”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990); United States v. Alvarado, 882 F.2d 645, 649-50 (2d Cir.) (agent’s statements that defendant had a daughter and it would be in her interest to cooperate, cooperation would be brought to judge’s attention, and failure to cooperate could subject her to a 10-year prison sentence did not render confession …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Maldonado-Rivera
United States v. Tillem, 906 F.2d 814, 827 (2d Cir.1990); see United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1140 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990). 78 We find no deviation from these principles or abuse of discretion in the present case.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Maldonado-Rivera
United States v. Tillem, 906 F.2d 814, 827 (2d Cir.1990); see United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1140 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, -— U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Joseph V.
See, e.g., United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1141 (2d Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S. Ct. 1139 , 107 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Joseph V.
See, e.g., United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1141 (2d Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S. Ct. 1139 , 107 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
PCG TRADING, LLC v. Seyfarth Shaw, LLP
See, e.g., Panzardi-Alvarez v. United States, 879 F.2d 975, 981 (1st Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 (1990), and cases cited (judge did not abuse discretion in denying lawyer’s pro hac vice admission given evidence of ethical violations in criminal matter).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lionel Reifler, Glenn B. Laken, John M. Black, Jr.
Evidence of a defendant’s ties to organized crime or of his other crimes may also be admissible “to provide background for the events alleged in the indictment,” *92 United States v. Daly, 842 F.2d 1380, 1388 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 821 , 109 S.Ct. 66 , 102 L.Ed.2d 43 (1988); see, e.g., United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1138-39 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990), or to “enable the jury to understand the complete story of the crimes charged,” or “how the illegal relationship between [coconspirators] developed,” Uni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Scott
See also United States v. Gilbert, 884 F.2d 454, 457 (9th Cir.1989) (stating that threat should be considered in light of entire factual context, including surrounding events and reaction of listeners), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990); United States v. Hoffman, 806 F.2d 703, 707 (7th Cir.1986) (holding that “true threat” is one made in context wherein reasonable person would foresee that it would be interpreted by recipient as expression of intent to inflict harm), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1005 , 107 S.Ct. 1627 , 95 L.Ed.2d 201 (1987). 11.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David L. Ries
“A defendant’s right to the counsel of his choice includes the right to have an out-of-state lawyer admitted pro hac vice.” United States v. Lillie, 989 F.2d 1054, 1056 (9th Cir.1993); see also Panzardi-Alvarez v. United States, 879 F.2d 975, 980 (1st Cir.1989)(“[A] decision denying a pro hac vice admission necessarily implicates constitutional concerns.”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Planned Parenthood of Columbia/Williamette, Inc. v. American Coalition of Life Activists
See Lovell, 90 F.3d at 372 ; see also United States v. Gilbert, 884 F.2d 454, 455-57 (9th Cir.1989) (examining what a letter and enclosed poster implied to determine whether they constituted an unprotected threat), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sui Yin Ho
See, e.g., United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1138 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990); United States v. Alvarado, 882 F.2d 645, 649-50 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1071 , 110 S.Ct. 1114 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1990); United States v. Pomares, 499 F.2d 1220, 1222 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1032 , 95 S.Ct. 514 , 42 L.Ed.2d 307 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert H. Hopkins
See, e.g., United States v. Mang Sun Wong, 884 F.2d 1537, 1541 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. City of Hayward, United States of America v. City of Hayward
This court has previously stated that § 3617 may involve a “situation where no discriminatory housing practice may have occurred at all ... because the rights have actually been respected by persons who suffer consequent retaliation.” Smith v. Stechel, 510 F.2d 1162, 1164 (9th Cir.1975); see also United States v. Gilbert, 813 F.2d 1523, 1528 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 860 , 108 S.Ct. 173 , 98 L.Ed.2d 127 (1987), and cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Air Disaster At Lockerbie Scotland On December 21, 1988
See, e.g., United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1137 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pagnucco v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1137 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca8 1994
Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673 , 106 S.Ct. 1431 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986); Lufkins v. Leapley, 965 F.2d 1477, 1480-81 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 271 , 121 L.Ed.2d 200 (1992); see also Williams v. Armontrout, 877 F.2d 1376, 1379-81 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990) (due-process claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. International Business MacHines Corp.
See id.; see also Panzardi-Alvarez v. United States, 879 F.2d 975, 984 (1st Cir.1989) (it is rare when judge's attitude toward party's counsel is so hostile that judge is rendered unable to remain impartial toward client), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1990). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Juvenile Male J.H.H., United States of America v. Juvenile Male L.M.J., United States of America v. Juvenile Male R.A.V.
(2×)
See Watts v. United States, 394 U.S. 705, 707 , 89 S.Ct. 1399, 1401 , 22 L.Ed.2d 664 (1969) (per curiam) (in the context of an alleged threat to the President’s life in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 871 ); see also United States v. Gilbert, 884 F.2d 454, 456-57 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Samuel Haynes
See also United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125, 1130 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1139 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990) (severance required when “the conflict is so irreconcilable that acceptance of one defendant’s defense requires that the testimony offered on behalf of a codefendant be disbelieved”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mount
See, e.g., Panzardi-Alvarez v. United States, 879 F.2d 975, 985 (1st Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 (1990); Tracey v. United States, 739 F.2d 679, 681 (1st Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1109 (1985). 2 In No. 93-1264, appellant appeals from the denial of a motion under Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mount v. United States
See, e.g., Panzardi- ___ ____ _________ Alvarez v. United States, 879 F.2d 975, 985 (1st Cir. 1989), _______ _____________ cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 (1990); Tracey v. United States, ____________ ______ _____________ 739 F.2d 679, 681 (1st Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. ____________ 1109 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mount v. United States
See, e.g., Panzardi-Alvarez v. United States, 879 F.2d 975, 985 (1st Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 (1990); Tracey v. United States, 739 F.2d 679, 681 (1st Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1109 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Orndorff v. Lockhart
Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673 , 106 S.Ct. 1431 , 89 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986); Lufkins v. Leapley, 965 F.2d 1477, 1480-81 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 271 , 121 L.Ed.2d 200 (1992); see also Williams v. Armontrout, 877 F.2d 1376, 1379-81 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082, 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1990) (due-process claim).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hernando Arias, Illiana Arias, United States of America v. Eduardo Mota
Moreover, we agree with the view expressed by other circuits that where “the evidence supports both actual knowledge and deliberate ignorance, the instruction is properly given.” United States v. Ochoa-Fabian, 935 F.2d 1139, 1142 (10th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1565 , 118 L.Ed.2d 211 (1992); see also United States v. Mang Sun Wong, 884 F.2d 1537, 1542 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1082 , 110 S.Ct. 1140 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1990).
Lamb
v.
Sowders, Warden
v.
Sowders, Warden
No. 89-5853.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1990.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.