green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ziegler
See Duncan v. Storie, 869 F.2d 1100, 1102 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 852 , 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 110 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jack R. Salley, Individually and on Behalf of His Minor Daughter, Danielle Salley, Cross-Appellants. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Cross-Appellees
See, Lowry v. Bankers Life and Casualty Retirement Plan, 871 F.2d 522, 524 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 852 , 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 111 (1989) (granting the Plan Committee the power to “interpret and construe” the plan was sufficient to apply the abuse of discretion standard); Batchelor v. Int’l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 861 Pension and Retirement Fund, 877 F.2d 441, 443 (5th Cir.1989) (the following language gave the ■administrator discretion: the Trustees “have full and exclusive authority to determine all questions of coverage and eligibili-ty_ They ... h…
discussed
Cited "see"
Salley v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.
See, Lowry v. Bankers Life and Casualty Retirement Plan, 871 F.2d 522, 524 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 852 , 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 111 (1989) (granting the Plan Committee the power to 1 In accordance with an agreement between the parties, DuPont paid Danielle's hospitalization expenses through November 20, 1990, although DuPont challenges whether the Plan required it to make the payments. "interpret and construe" the plan was sufficient to apply the abuse of discretion standard); Batchelor v. Int'l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 861 Pension and Retirement Fund, 877 F.2d 4…
cited
Cited "see"
Dailey v. Lyles
See Duncan v. Storie, 869 F.2d 1100, 1102 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 852 , 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 110 (1989). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.
In Posnerian terms, “the arbitrary and capricious standard may be a range, not a point.” Id. at 1052 ; accord Lowry v. Bankers Life & Casualty Retirement Plan, 871 F.2d 522 , 525 n. 6 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 111 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Lindsey v. City of St. Paul
See Duncan v. Storie, 869 F.2d 1100, 1103 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 110 (1989); Patzner v. Burkett, 779 F.2d 1363, 1371 (8th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Morsel JONES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SONAT, INC. MASTER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, Defendant-Appellant
Brown v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., 898 F.2d 1556, 1566-67 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1040 , 111 S.Ct. 712 , 112 L.Ed.2d 701 (1991), quoted with approval in Wildbur, 974 F.2d at 638 ; see also Lowry v. Bankers Life & Casualty Retirement Plan, 871 F.2d 522 , 525 n. 6 (5th Cir.) (describing a “sliding scale” judicial review of trustees’ decisions for lack of good faith as being “more penetrating the greater ... the suspicion of partiality, less penetrating the smaller that suspicion”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 852 , 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 111 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. SONAT, Inc. Master Employee Benefits Plan Administrative Committee
Brown v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., 898 F.2d 1556, 1566-67 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1040 , 111 S.Ct. 712 , 112 L.Ed.2d 701 (1991), quoted with approval in Wildbur, 974 F.2d at 638 ; see also Lowry v. Bankers Life & Casualty Retirement Plan, 871 F.2d 522 , 525 n. 6 (5th Cir.) (describing a "sliding scale" judicial review of trustees' decisions for lack of good faith as being "more penetrating the greater ... the suspicion of partiality, less penetrating the smaller that suspicion"), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 852 , 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 111 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chunn v. State
Bobo, 757 S.W.2d at 61 (emphasis in original); see also Erlandson v. State, 763 S.W.2d 845, 850 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1988, pet. ref’d), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 852 , 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 110 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph v. Morales v. Pan American Life Insurance Co.
Id; see also Lowry v. Bankers Life & Casualty Retirement Plan, 871 F.2d 522 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 111 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arfsten v. Frontier Airlines, Inc. Retirement Plan for Pilots
Compare Lowry v. Bankers Life & Casualty Retirement Plan, 871 F.2d 522, 524 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 111 (1989); Boyd v. United Mine Workers Health & Retirement Funds, 873 F.2d 57, 59 (4th Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conrad Peter, in No. 88-3797 v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp., in No. 88-3798
See F.R.App.P. 28(b) (appellee’s brief on appeal shall adhere to F.R.App.P. 28(a)(4) and “contain the contentions of the [appellee] with respect to the issues presented” on appeal); In re Sugar Antitrust Litigation, 579 F.2d 13, 20 (3d Cir.1978) (refusing to grant rehearing to deal with issues not raised in the district court or briefed on appeal); see also, Lowry v. Bankers Life and Casualty Retirement Plan, 871 F.2d 522, 525 (5th Cir.1989) (refusing to address an argument made for the first time in an application for rehearing), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 152 , 107 L.Ed.2d 111 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Erlandson
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 89-133.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1989.
Published
Ct. App. Tex., 14th Dist. Certiorari denied.