green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.5 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"Defendants cannot escape responsibility by showing that they have improved upon or modified the plaintiff's process... minor variations are to be expected."
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re Trust
we hold that the bankruptcy-court did not err in its determination that there was bad faith to justify lifting the stay.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Weins v. Sporleder
(2×)
defendants cannot escape responsibility by showing that they have improved upon or modified the plaintiffs process ... minor variations are to be expected.
discussed
Cited "see"
Moulton v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. (In Re Moulton)
See generally, Barclays-American/Business Credit, Inc. v. Radio WBHP, Inc. (In re Dixie Broadcasting, Inc.), 871 F.2d *763 1023, 1027 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989); Natural Land Corp. v. Baker Farms, Inc. (In re Natural Land Corp.), 825 F.2d 296, 298 (11th Cir.1987); Shell Oil Co. v. Waldron (In re Waldron), 785 F.2d 936, 939 (11th Cir.1986); Albany Partners, Ltd. v. Westbrook (In re Albany Partners, Ltd.), 749 F.2d 670, 674 (11th Cir.1984); Kitchens v. Georgia Railroad Bank and Trust Co. (In re Kitchens), 702 F.2d 885, 888-889 (11th Cir.1…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mendoza v. Temple-Inland Mortgage Corp.
(2×)
See In re Dixie Broadcasting, Inc., 871 F.2d 1023 , 1026 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
In The Matter Of Josephine M. Mendoza
See In re Dixie Broadcasting, Inc., 871 F.2d 1023 , 1026 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989). 8 A court may abuse its discretion by erroneously concluding that the law does not afford it the discretion to do something.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Watkins
See, In re Dixie Broadcasting, Inc., 871 F.2d 1023 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, Dixie Broadcasting, Inc. v. Radio WBHP, Inc., 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989); In re Waldron, 785 F.2d 936 (11th Cir.1986), cert. dismissed sub nom., Waldron v. Shell Oil Co., 478 U.S. 1028 , 106 S.Ct. 3343 , 92 L.Ed.2d 763 (1986); and In re Albany Partners, Ltd., 749 F.2d 670 (11th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Rosen
See In re Dixie Broadcasting, Inc., 871 F.2d 1023 , 1026 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom Dixie Broadcasting v. Radio WBHP, Inc., 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989); Hohol v. Essex Industries, Inc., 141 B.R. 293, 297 (M.D.Pa.1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Virginia Panel Corp. v. Mac Panel Co.
See Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd, 868 F.2d 1226, 1247 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert W. Kearns, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chrysler Corporation, and American Motors Corporation
See Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., 868 F.2d 1226, 1235 , 9 USPQ2d 1913, 1919 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
THK America, Inc. v. NSK Ltd.
See Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd., 868 F.2d 1226 , 1247 (Fed.Cir.) (harm to patentee increases as patent nears expiration), cert, denied 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989). .
cited
Cited "see"
Monovis, Inc. v. Aquino
See Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd., 868 F.2d 1226, 1249-1250 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989), and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anton/Bauer, Inc. v. Energex Systems Corp.
See Everpure v. Cuno, Inc., 875 F.2d 300 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989); Dana Corp. v. I.P.C., Ltd., 860 F.2d 415 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied 490 U.S. 1067 , 109 S.Ct. 2068 , 104 L.Ed.2d 633 (1989); see also Aro Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see"
Norbert C. Pearson, Also Known as Spike v. City of Grand Blanc, J. Larry Tomlinson
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Accord Harding v. County of Door, 870 F.2d 430, 431 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989). 38 .
cited
Cited "see"
Estate of Stoller v. Ford Motor Co.
See Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., 868 F.2d 1226, 1236 , 9 U.S.P.Q.2d 1913 , 1920 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald H. FRIEZE, Appellee, v BOATMEN’S BANK OF BELTON, Appellant
See Wilkins v. Eaton Corp., 797 F.2d 342, 343 (6th Cir.1986). “[0]ur role is to ascertain whether the record contains evidence from which a reasonable [jury] could have concluded that age discrimination was a determining factor in [Frieze’s] dismissal.” Brooks v. Monroe Sys. for Business, Inc., 873 F.2d 202, 204 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Watlington v. University of Puerto Rico
Corp. v. Ramirez-Rivera, 869 F.2d 624, 627 (1st Cir.1989); accord Brooks v. Monroe Systems for Business, Inc., 873 F.2d 202, 205 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re St. Charles Preservation Investors, Ltd. Appeal of A.D. Adair, Jr.
See In re Dixie Broadcasting Inc., 871 F.2d 1023 , 1028 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989); Bowers v. Connecticut *729 National Bank, 847 F.2d 1019, 1023 (2d Cir.1988); Matter of Greene County Hospital, 835 F.2d 589, 596 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 820 , 109 S.Ct. 64 , 102 L.Ed.2d 41 (1988); In re Commercial Contractors, Inc., 771 F.2d 1373, 1375 (10th Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Hesston Corp. v. Sloop
See Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd., 868 F.2d 1226, 1247 (Fed.Cir.1989), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 .
cited
Cited "see"
Hesston Corp. v. Sloop
See Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd., 868 F.2d 1226, 1238 (Fed.Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bristol-Myers Co. v. U.S. Intern. Trade Com'n
See Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co. 868 F.2d 1226, 1236 , 9 USPQ2d 1913, 1920 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 154 (1989) (for anticipation the claimed invention must be described in a single prior art reference). 16 The parties adduced evidence as to various modifications of Example 7.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Canon, Inc. v. GCC International Ltd.
Co. v. Convertible Top Co., 365 U.S. 336 , 81 S.Ct. 599 , 5 L.Ed.2d 592 (1961); see also Everpure, Inc. v. Cuno, Inc., 875 F.2d 300, 302 (Fed.Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Canon Inc. v. GCC International Ltd.
Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co., 365 U.S. 336 , 81 S.Ct. 599 , 5 L.Ed.2d 592 (1961); see also Everpure, Inc. v. Cuno, Inc., 875 F.2d 300, 302-03 (Fed.Cir.1989), cer t. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Montgomery v. Dennis Joslin Co. II Ex Rel. Seasons Mortgage Group Inc. (In Re Montgomery)
See also In re Dixie Broadcasting, Inc., 871 F.2d 1023 , 1026 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989); In re Sun Valley Foods Co., 801 F.2d 186 , 190 (6th Cir.1986); In re Boomgarden, 780 F.2d 657, 659-660 (7th Cir.1985); In re Kemble, 776 F.2d 802, 805 (9th Cir.1985); In re Comer, 716 F.2d 168 , 172 (3d Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jove Engineering, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service
See, e.g., In re Dixie Broadcasting, Inc., 871 F.2d 1023 , 1029 (11th Cir.) (District court's remand order not final because bankruptcy court must consider factors to determine bad faith which is an evaluative process involving more than ministerial duties), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989); In re Briglevich, 847 F.2d 759, 761 (11th Cir.1988) (Where the district court remanded to bankruptcy court to determine amount of money paid only for necessary contract work, the order “is not a final order under § 158(d) [s]ince [it] remand[s] for more than merely mec…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Kendall Company v. Progressive Medical Technology, Inc.
See Sage Prods., 45 F.3d at 1578-79 , 33 USPQ2d at 1767-68; see also Everpure, Inc. v. Cuno, Inc., 875 F.2d 300 , 10 USPQ2d 1855 (Fed.Cir.) (affirming summary judgment that replacement of spent filter cartridges was permissible repair, not direct infringement), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hartland Sportsman's Club, Inc. v. Town of Delafield
Coniston, 844 F.2d at 467 (emphasis added); see also Harding v. County of Door, 870 F.2d 430, 431 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., and Jerry A. Alexander
See, e.g., Everpure, Inc. v. Cuno, Inc., 875 F.2d 300 , 10 USPQ2d 1855 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Finch v. Finch (In Re Finch)
The parties to this appeal agree that this Court may review the bankruptcy court’s decision to deny avoidance of the lien and to grant relief from the automatic stay only for an abuse of discretion. 11 U.S.C. § 362 (d)(1) (1988); see, e.g., In re Dixie Broadcasting, Inc., 871 F.2d 1023 , 1026 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989); Pursifull v. Eakin, 814 F.2d 1501, 1504 (10th Cir.1987); In re MacDonald, 755 F.2d 715 , 716-17 (9th Cir.1985); In re Holtkamp, 669 F.2d 505, 507 (7th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul Stein
United States v. Allen, 873 F.2d 963 (6th Cir.1989) (upholding the Guidelines against a similar due process challenge); see also United States v. Brittman, 872 F.2d 827, 828 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct 154 (1989) (same). 11 Second, Stein attacks the two-track sentencing procedure as violative of his due process rights.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DIXIE BROADCASTING, INC.
v.
RADIO WBHP, INC.
v.
RADIO WBHP, INC.
No. 89-147.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1989.
110 S. Ct. 154
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: South Dakota Supreme Court (2) · N.D. Texas (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Denied.