green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robb Montgomery Love v. State
inadmissible evidence can be rendered harmless if other evidence at trial is admitted without objection and it proves the same fact that the inadmissible evidence sought to prove.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Eckford-El v. Toombs
the record does not suggest in any way that the defendant's actions were somehow unofficial. the capacity in which the individual defendants were in fact acting is what matters, not the 1270 capacity in which they were sued_
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Garceau v. City of Flint
See 497 U.S. 1001 , 110 S.Ct. 3232 , 111 L.Ed.2d 744 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re W.R. Grace & Co.
See In re Charter Co., 876 F.2d, 866 , 874 (11th Cir.1989), cert. dismissed 496 U.S. 944 , 110 S.Ct. 3232 , 110 L.Ed.2d 678 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Strouss v. Michigan Department of Corrections
See Rice v. Ohio Dep't of Transp., 887 F.2d 716 , 721 (6th Cir.1989) (“[r]he First Amendment does not convert every public employee grievance into a matter of public concern____”), rev'd on other grounds, 497 U.S. 1001 , 110 S.Ct. 3232 , 111 L.Ed.2d 744 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
James G. Jackson v. City of Columbus, Gregory Lashutka, Thomas W. Rice, Sr.
(2×)
See Rice v. Ohio Dep’t of Transp., 887 F.2d 716 , 721 (6th Cir.1989) (“[T]he First Amendment does not convert every public employee grievance into a matter of 'public concern .... ”), rev’d on other grounds, 497 U.S. 1001 , 110 S.Ct. 3232 , 111 L.Ed.2d 744 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Corpus v. State
See Anderson v. State, 717 S.W.2d 622, 628 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), cert, denied, 496 U.S. 944 , 110 S.Ct. 3232 , 110 L.Ed.2d 678 (1990) (no reversible error when same facts shown by other testimony).
cited
Cited "see"
Jerry Michael Conn v. Cso Borjorquez, and Frank Terry, Major, Employed at Arizona State Prison--Florence
See Rice v. Ohio Dept, of Transp., — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 3232 , 111 L.Ed.2d 744 (1990). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Philip Wayne Berryman and Chester Joseph Krupinski v. Perry M. Johnson
See generally Kelley v. Metropolitan County Board of Education of Nashville and Davidson County, 836 F.2d 986, 989 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1206 (1988) 5 The quoted language comes from Will, 491 U.S. at 71 , as quoted in Rice v. Ohio Department of Transportation, 887 F.2d 716, 719 (6th Cir.1989), vacated on other grounds, 110 S.Ct. 3232 (1990) 6 If this case is not settled or otherwise disposed of short of trial, of course, the plaintiffs will ultimately have to show what Mr. Johnson actually knew or should have known about the conditions complained of, and what his responsibilit…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lobato v. New Mexico Environment Department, Environmental Health Division
In David , the Tenth Circuit found that a plaintiffs EEOC complaints did not address matters of public concern where the plaintiffs charges failed to allege “that other employees have been subjected to harassment or retaliation or that the harassment and retaliation has interfered with the Department’s performance of its governmental responsibilities.” 101 F.3d at 1356 ; see also Rice v. Ohio Dep’t of Transp., 887 F.2d 716 , 720-21 (6th Cir. 1989) (finding that, because it related only to a personal employment dispute, plaintiffs discrimination charge was not protected by the First Ame…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
West v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department
Compare Cutrer v. McMillan, 308 Fed.Appx. 819, 821 (5th Cir.2009) (“EEOC charges alone are not protected speech.”), Short v. *1104 City of West Point, 125 F.3d 853, at *1 (5th Cir.1997) (“Lodging a complaint with the EEOC, without further airing of grievances, creates a private, personal dispute between employer and employee.”), and Rice v. Ohio Dep’t of Transp., 887 F.2d 716 , 720-21 (6th Cir.1989) (finding that, because it related only to personal employment dispute, plaintiffs discrimination charge was not entitled to First Amendment protection), vacated on other grounds, 497 U.S.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gentry v. Circuit City Stores, Inc. (In Re Circuit City Stores, Inc.)
See, e.g., In re Charter Co. 876 F.2d 866 , 873 (11th Cir.1989), cert. dismissed, 496 U.S. 944 , 110 S.Ct. 3232 , 110 L.Ed.2d 678 (1990); In re American Reserve Corp., 840 F.2d 487, 492 (7th Cir.1988) (authorizing class proofs of claim as consistent with the purposes of the Bankruptcy Code and Rules).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aiello v. Providian Financial Corp. (In Re Aiello)
See also In re Charter Co., 876 F.2d 866 (11th Cir.1989), cert. dismissed 496 U.S. 944 , 110 S.Ct. 3232 , 110 L.Ed.2d 678 (1990); In re Madison Assoc., 183 B.R. 206, 214 (Bankr.C.D.Cal.1995); In re Appliance Store, 158 B.R. 384 (Bankr.W.D.Pa.1993); In re Weisbrod, 138 B.R. 869 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 1992); In re Livaditis, 132 B.R. 897 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1991); and Norton Bankr.L. & Prac.2d § 154:14.5 Class Actions (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Badia v. City of Miami
Compare Greenwood v. Ross, 778 F.2d 448, 457 (8th Cir.1985) (“Appellant’s filing of an EEOC charge and a civil rights lawsuit are activities protected by the first amendment.”), with Rice v. Ohio Dep’t of Transp., 887 F.2d 716 , 720-21 (6th Cir.1989) (because it related only to personal employment dispute, plaintiff’s discrimination charge was not entitled to First Amendment protection), vacated on other grounds, 497 U.S. 1001 , 110 S.Ct. 3232 , 111 L.Ed.2d 744 (1990), and Yatvin v. Madison Metro.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
76 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1, 72 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,214, 11 Fla. L. Weekly C1017 Anais A. Badia v. City of Miami, a Municipal Corporation, Wally Lee, Individually and as Director of Department of Public Works
Compare Greenwood v. Ross, 778 F.2d 448, 457 (8th Cir.1985) ("Appellant's filing of an EEOC charge and a civil rights lawsuit are activities protected by the first amendment."), with Rice v. Ohio Dep't of Transp., 887 F.2d 716 , 720-21 (6th Cir.1989) (because it related only to personal employment dispute, plaintiff's discrimination charge was not entitled to First Amendment protection), vacated on other grounds, 497 U.S. 1001 , 110 S.Ct. 3232 , 111 L.Ed.2d 744 (1990), and Yatvin v. Madison Metro.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scott v. Goodman
Compare Greenwood, 778 F.2d 448 (8th Cir.1985) (the filing of an EEOC charge and a civil rights lawsuit are activities protected by the First Amendment), with Yatvin v. Madison Metropolitan School District, 840 F.2d 412 (7th Cir.1988) (rejecting per se rule of Greenwood , as “not every legal gesture ... is protected by the First Amendment.”), and Rice v. Dept. of Transportation, 887 F.2d 716 (6th Cir.1989), vacated on other grounds, 497 U.S. 1001 , 110 S.Ct. 3232 , 111 L.Ed.2d 744 (1990) (First Amendment does not convert every public employee grievance into a matter of public concern).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fitzpatrick v. Meyer
See also, Ohio Inns Inc. v. Nye, 542 F.2d 673, 679 (6th Cir.1976) (§ 1985(3) claim based upon a state action conspiracy dismissed for failure to allege racial or otherwise class-based discriminatory animus) and Rice v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 887 F.2d 716 , 722 (6th Cir.1989) (grant of summary judgment upheld on § 1985(3) claim for failure to allege racial or class-based discrimination) vacated, 497 U.S. 1001 , 110 S.Ct. 3232 , 111 L.Ed.2d 744 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fitzpatrick v. Meyer
See also, Ohio Inns Inc. v. Nye, 542 F.2d 673, 679 (6th Cir.1976) (§ 1985(3) claim based upon a state action conspiracy dismissed for failure to allege racial or otherwise class-based discriminatory animus) and Rice v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 887 F.2d 716 , 722 (6th Cir.1989) (grant of summary judgment upheld on § 1985(3) claim for failure to allege racial or class-based discrimination) vacated, 497 U.S. 1001 , 110 S.Ct. 3232 , 111 L.Ed.2d 744 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Office and Professional Employees International Union, Local 2 v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Compare In re Chateaugay, 104 B.R. 626 , 636 nn.12 & 13 (S.D.N.Y.1989), and In re Charter Co., 876 F.2d 866 (11th Cir.1989), cert. dismissed, 496 U.S. 944 , 110 S.Ct. 3232 , 110 L.Ed.2d 678 (1990) (both reading rule flexibly, in light of purposes of Bankruptcy Code), with In re Vestra Indus., Inc., 82 B.R. 21, 22 (Bankr.D.S.C.1987) (rejecting union’s claim which failed to state names and addresses of employees, but granting employees additional time to file new claims). 11 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CHARTER COMPANY
v.
CERTIFIED CLASS IN the CHARTER SECURITIES LITIGATION
v.
CERTIFIED CLASS IN the CHARTER SECURITIES LITIGATION
No. 89-579.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 1990.
110 S. Ct. 3232
Published
Citer courts: W.D. Michigan (1) · Court of Appeals of Texas (1)
The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed pursuant to Rule 46 of this Court.