green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
5.6 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 1 distinct case ·
“our analysis of relatedness and continuity has shifted from the enterprise element to the pattern element.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[T]he issues of federal preemption and removability largely merge.”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lydon v. Boston Sand & Gravel Co.
he issues of federal preemption and removability largely merge.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Barrett v. United States Banknote Corp.
our analysis of relatedness and continuity has shifted from the enterprise element to the pattern element.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Patrick Carter Associates, Inc. v. Rent Stabilization Ass'n of N.Y.C., Inc.
congress's goal in fashioning its definition of 'pattern of racketeering activity' was to exclude from the reach of rico criminal acts that were merely 'isolated' or 'sporadic'____
discussed
Cited "see"
Bradshaw v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
See Caterpillar, 482 U.S. at 399 , 107 S.Ct. at 2433 ; accord Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326, 1334 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Martin Jimeno, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Mobil Oil Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
See Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Update Traffic Systems, Inc. v. Gould
See Beauford v. Helmsley, 865 F.2d 1386, 1391 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989); United States v. Indelicato, 865 F.2d 1370, 1381 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 811 , 110 S.Ct. 56 , 107 L.Ed.2d 24 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Kenneth D. Henegar v. William M. Banta
See Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326 , 1334-35 n. 4 (6th Cir.)(en banc), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morin v. Trupin
See Beauford v. Helmsley, 865 F.2d 1386, 1391 (2d Cir.), vacated, Helmsley v. Beauford, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 3236 , 106 L.Ed.2d 584 on remand, 893 F.2d 1433 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Fox v. Parker Hannifin Corp.
See Caterpillar, 482 U.S. at 399 , 107 S.Ct. at 2433 ; accord Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326, 1334 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fox v. Parker Hannifin Corporation
See Caterpillar, 482 U.S. at 399 , 107 S.Ct. at 2433 ; accord Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326, 1334 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beauford v. Helmsley
See Beauford v. Helmsley, 650 F.Supp. 548 (S.D.N.Y.1986), affd, 843 F.2d 103 (2d Cir.1988), reversed upon rehearing en banc, 865 F.2d 1386 (2d Cir.1989), vacated, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 3236 , 106 L.Ed.2d 584 , adhered to upon further consideration, 893 F.2d 1433 , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Adamo Demolition Group v. International Union of Operating Engineers Local 150
See also Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326 , 1331 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S. Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gross v. Waywell
See, e.g., Beauford v. Helmsley, 865 F.2d 1386 (2d Cir.) (en banc), vacated and remanded, 492 U.S. 914 , 109 S.Ct. 3236 , 106 L.Ed.2d 584 , original decision adhered to, 893 F.2d 1433 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989); cf. Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. McMahon, 482 U.S. 220, 239 , 107 S.Ct. 2332 , 96 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987) (noting that " '[T]he makings of a "pattern of racketeering” are not yet clear, but the fact remains that a "pattern” for civil purposes is "a pattern” for criminal purposes' ” (quoting Page v. Moseley, Hallgarten, Estabr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wrobbel v. Asplundh Construction Corp.
See also, Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326 (6th Cir.1989) (en banc), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989) (holding that an employee’s state-law handicap discrimination claim that Chrysler illegally refused to return him to his former position because of his handicap was not preempted under § 301 even though Chrysler’s defense was that it had acted properly under the collective-bargaining agreement); O’Shea v. Detroit News, 887 F.2d 683 , 686-87 (6th Cir.1989) (plaintiffs Michigan age and handicap discrimination claim not preempted.).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Knox v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.
See also Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326 (6th Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989); Miller v. AT & T Network Systems, 850 F.2d 543 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barsam v. Pure Tech International, Inc.
See also Beauford v. Helmsley, 865 F.2d 1386, 1391 (2d Cir.) (en banc) (“our analysis of relatedness and continuity has shifted from the enterprise element to the pattern element”), vacated and remanded, 492 U.S. 914 , 109 S.Ct. 3236 , 106 L.Ed.2d 584 , adhered to upon further consideration, 893 F.2d 1433 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kube v. New Penn Motor Express, Inc.
Co., Inc., 860 F.2d 1514, 1517 (9th Cir.1988); see also Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326, 1334 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989) (claim for discrimination on the basis of a handicap involves purely factual questions concerning employer’s behavior and motivation; interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement is not required); Miller v. AT & T Network Sys., 850 F.2d 543, 547 (9th Cir.1988) (if mere overlap between mandatory state anti-discrimination provisions and labor contracts resulted in pre-emption of the state law, then § 30…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Decoe v. General Motors Corporation
See also Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326, 1331 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989). 24 In order to make the first determination, the court is not bound by the "well-pleaded complaint" rule, but rather, looks to the essence of the plaintiff's claim, in order to determine whether the plaintiff is attempting to disguise what is essentially a contract claim as a tort.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
DeCoe v. General Motors Corp.
See also Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326, 1331 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crespo v. Candela Laser Corp.
See also Smolarek v. Chrysler Corp., 879 F.2d 1326, 1330 (6th Cir.) (“The fact that a defendant might ultimately prove that a plaintiff’s claims are preempted under the NLRA does not establish that they are removable to federal court.” [citing Caterpillar, 482 U.S. at 398 , 107 S.Ct. at 2432 ] [emphasis in Smolarek], cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 [ 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989)]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Landy v. Heller, White & Co.
Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 492 U.S. 229, 239 , 109 S.Ct. 2893, 2900 , 106 L.Ed.2d 195 (1989); see also Beauford v. Helmsley, 865 F.2d 1386, 1390-91 (2d Cir.) (en banc), vacated, 492 U.S. 914 , 109 S.Ct. 3236 , 106 L.Ed.2d 584 and adhered to, 893 F.2d 1433 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 992 , 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Farberware, Inc. v. Groben
Rather, as the Supreme Court noted in Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., 473 U.S. 479 , 496 n. 14, 105 S.Ct. 3275 , 3285 n. 14, 87 L.Ed.2d 346 (1985), “while two acts are necessary, they may not be sufficient.” More recently, the Supreme Court further expounded upon the pattern requirement in RICO cases, holding that “RICO’s legislative history reveals Congress’ intent that to prove a pattern of racketeering activity a plaintiff or prosecutor must show that the racketeering predicates are related, and that they amount to or pose a threat of continued criminal activity.” H.J., Inc. v. N…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clapp v. Greene
See also Beauford v. Helmsley, 865 F.2d 1386, 1391 (2d Cir.), vacated and remanded, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 3236 , 106 L.Ed.2d 584 (1989), reaffirmed, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 539 , 107 L.Ed.2d 537 (1989); United States v. Indelicato, 865 F.2d 1370 (2d Cir.1989). 3 A pattern is established for RICO purposes where the predicate acts “themselves amount to, or ... otherwise constitute a threat of, continuing racketeering activity.” H.J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ADMINISTRATORS of the TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
v.
Michael Anthony PRESTI and Lloyd A. Pizzaloto, Sr.
v.
Michael Anthony PRESTI and Lloyd A. Pizzaloto, Sr.
No. 89-571.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1989.
110 S. Ct. 539
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (2) · D. Massachusetts (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Denied.