green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.2 score
“a corporation organized under the laws of a foreign nation remains an alien corporation under 1332(c), even if its principal place of business is in one of the states”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pancan International Management Consultants, Inc. v. STS Microscan, Inc.
a corporation organized under the laws of a foreign nation remains an alien corporation under 1332(c), even if its principal place of business is in one of the states
discussed
Cited "see"
Astra Oil Trading NV v. PRSI Trading Co. LP
See Int’l Shipping Co. v. Hydra Offshore, 875 F.2d 388 , 391 (2d Cir.1989) (upholding Rule 11 sanctions against attorney for arguing alien corporation’s sole citizenship was U.S. State of its principal place of business), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989); see also Universal Licensing Corp. v. Paola del Lungo S.p.A, 293 F.3d 579 (2d Cir.2002); Franceskin v. Credit Suisse, 214 F.3d 253 (2d Cir.2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Savino v. Computer Credit, Inc.
See Note on Advisory Committee to Rule 11, 1993 Amendments; accord International Shipping Co., S.A. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 392 (2d Cir.) (Rule 11 empowers a court with broad discretion to award that portion of an attorney’s fee thought reasonable to serve the sanctioning purpose of the Rule), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Photocircuits Corp. v. Marathon Agents, Inc.
See Note on Advisory Committee to Rule 11, 1993 Amendments; accord International Shipping Co., S.A v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 392 (2d Cir.) (Rule 11 empowers a court with broad discretion to award that portion of an attorney’s fee thought reasonable to serve the sanctioning purpose of the Rule), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kirschner v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Incorporated Village of Valley Stream
See Notes on Advisory Committee to Rule 11, 1993 Amendments; accord International Shipping v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388 , 392 (2d Cir.) (Rule 11 empowers a court with broad discretion to award that portion of an attorney’s fee thought reasonable to serve the sanctioning purpose of the Rule), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cento Group, S.P.A. v. OroAmerica, Inc.
See International Shipping Co., S.A. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 390 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Golub v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989); Oliveri v. Thompson, 803 F.2d 1265, 1274-75 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 918 , 107 S.Ct. 1373 , 94 L.Ed.2d 689 (1987); Quadrozzi v. City of New York, 127 F.R.D. 63, 79 (S.D.N.Y.1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Daly v. DelPonte
See Burns v. Barrett, 212 Conn. 176, 184 , 561 A.2d 1378 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S. Ct. 563 , 107 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Efferson v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
See Kelly v. Smith, 485 F.2d 520 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Chicot Land Co. v. Kelly, 416 U.S. 969 , 94 S.Ct. 1991 , 40 L.Ed.2d 558 (1974), Molett v. Penrod Drilling Co., 826 F.2d 1419 (5th Cir.1987), and Molett v. Penrod Drilling Co., 872 F.2d 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Columbus-McKinnon v. Gearench, Inc., 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Daly v. DelPonte
See Burns v. Barrett, 212 Conn. 176, 184 , 561 A.2d 1378 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S. Ct. 563 , 107 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Empire State Pharmaceutical Society, Inc. v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Greater New York
See Int’l Shipping Co. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388 , 390 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America
See International Shipping Co., S.A. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 390-91 (2d Cir.) (court will not tolerate “ ‘post hoc sleight of hand’ ”), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 -64, 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Of America, Afl-Cio
See International Shipping Co., S.A. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 390-91 (2d Cir.) (court will not tolerate " 'post hoc sleight of hand' "), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 -64, 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989). 29 If Rule 11 has been violated, sanctions are mandatory.
cited
Cited "see"
Neat-N-Tidy Co., Inc. v. Tradepower (Holdings) Ltd.
See International Shipping Co. S.A. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 391 (2d Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Bess Caroline Molett, Ind., Etc. v. Penrod Drilling Company, Gearench, Inc., Third Party v. Columbus-Mckinnon, Inc., Third Party
See Molett v. Penrod Drilling Co., 872 F.2d 1221, 1222 (5th Cir.1989) (“Molett II”), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gordon v. Mendelsohn (In Re Who's Who Worldwide Registry, Inc.)
See also Int’l Shipping Co. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388 , 390 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Askir v. Boutros-Ghali
See, e.g., International Shipping Co., S.A. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 391-92 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989); Corporacion Venezolana de Fomento v. Vintero Sales Corp., 629 F.2d 786, 790 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1080 , 101 S.Ct. 863 , 66 L.Ed.2d 804 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kusek v. Family Circle, Inc.
See also Banner Indus. v. Central States Pension Fund, 875 F.2d 1285 , 1294 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989); and Ohio v. Peterson, Lowry, Rall, *531 Barber & Ross, 651 F.2d 687, 693-94 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 895 , 102 S.Ct. 392 , 70 L.Ed.2d 209 (1981). “[W]here the claimant [fails] to exercise due diligence in preserving [her] legal rights, courts are reluctant to apply principles of equitable tolling to extend a federal limitation.” de Casenave v. United States, 991 F.2d 11, 13 (1st Cir.1993), citing Irwin v. Veterans A…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Silver Star Enterprises, Inc. v. M/v Saramacca, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Etc., in Rem
Bank, 69 F.2d 491, 492 (5th Cir.1934); see also Molett v. Penrod Drilling Co., 872 F.2d 1221, 1227 (5th Cir.) (stating that in a diversity suit, jurisdiction is ordinarily "determined at the commencement of the lawsuit, such that subsequent occurrences will not divest the court of subject-matter jurisdiction"), cer t. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989). 7 ., The district court's order was not set forth in a separate document. 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Silver Star Enterprises, Inc. v. M/V Saramacca
Bank, 69 F.2d 491, 492 (5th Cir. 1934); see also Molett v. Penrod Drilling Co., 872 F.2d 1221, 1227 (5th Cir.) (stating that in a diversity suit, jurisdiction is ordinarily "determined at the commencement of the lawsuit, such that subsequent occurrences will not divest the court of subject-matter jurisdiction"), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S. Ct. 563 , 107 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Powers v. British Vita, P.L.C.
If a court determines that a pleading, motion, or other paper is not well-grounded in fact, the court “shall impose upon the person who signed it, a represented party, or both, an appropriate sanction____” Fed.R.Civ.P. 11; see also International Shipping Co., S.A v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 390 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1003 , 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989); Eastway Constr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Durant v. Traditional Investments, Ltd.
“Once a violation [of Rule 11] is shown to exist, the district court may not ignore the command of the statute: ‘sanctions shall be imposed.’ ” O’Malley, supra, 896 F.2d at 709 (reversing district court for failure to impose Rule 11 sanctions) (quoting Eastway Construction, supra, 762 F.2d at 254 ) (emphasis in original); see also International Shipping Company, S.A. v. Hydra Offshore, Inc., 875 F.2d 388, 390 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 563 , 107 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989). “ ‘Greater attention by the district courts to pleading and motion abuses and the imposition of s…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barrett, dba Barrett Outdoor Communications
v.
Burns, Commissioner of Transportation of Connecticut
v.
Burns, Commissioner of Transportation of Connecticut
No. 89-636.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 11, 1989.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Michigan (1)
Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.