green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
7.9 score
“prior to discovery, a plaintiff challenged by a jurisdiction testing motion may defeat the motion by pleading in good faith ... legally sufficient allegations of jurisdiction”
Treatment trajectory · 1926 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1926
1976
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hamilton v. Accu-Tek
he nature of the plaintiffs obligation varies depending on the procedural posture of the litigation.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Village on Canon v. Bankers Trust Co.
e can see no purpose or intent in those lengthy negotiations if a binding amendment already had been agreed upon.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
General Textile Printing & Processing Corp. v. Expromtorg International Corp.
prior to discovery, a plaintiff challenged by a jurisdiction testing motion may defeat the motion by pleading in good faith ... legally sufficient allegations of jurisdiction
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Indiana Hi-Rail Corp. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
ujndisputed objective facts demonstrate beyond cavil that the parties did not intend to be bound until 'final papers' or an 'acceptable writing' was prepared and signed.
cited
Cited "see"
Milne v. Catuogno Court Reporting Services, Inc.
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194 , 198 n. 3 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Telebyte, Inc. v. Kendaco, Inc.
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 196-98 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Pentagen Technologies International Ltd. v. United States
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Photoactive Productions, Inc. v. AL-OR International Ltd.
See Ball v. Me-tallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A, 902 F.2d 194, 196-98 (2d Cir.) (discussing procedure for challenging personal jurisdiction), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990); see also Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts Inc., 579 F.2d 215, 218 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 908 , 99 S.Ct. 1215 , 59 L.Ed.2d 455 (1979) (holding that motion to transfer venue must be supported by affidavit).
cited
Cited "see"
Simon v. Philip Morris, Inc.
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Weiss v. La Suisse
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gleason Works v. Klingelnberg-Oerlikon Geartec Vertriebs-GmbH
Co. v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., 84 F.3d 560, 566 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1006 , 117 S.Ct. 508 , 136 L.Ed.2d 398 (1996); accord Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. *50 denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
GTE New Media Services, Inc. v. Ameritech Corp.
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hobo-kerb-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cleft of the Rock Foundation v. Wilson
Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd., 763 F.2d 55, 57 (2d Cir.1985); see Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 196-98 (2d Cir.) (discussing procedure for challenging personal jurisdiction), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coles v. Arizona Charlie's
See Hawkins v. Hennepin Technical Center, 900 F.2d 153, 155-56 (8th Cir.) (because employer’s past discriminatory policy and practice may be used to illustrate pretext in a Title VII disparate treatment case, evidence of past acts should normally be admitted into evidence), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990); Gonzales v. Police Dept., City of San Jose, 901 F.2d 758, 760-61 (9th Cir.1990) (in Title VII race discrimination case against city, court erred in failing to consider city’s repeated violations of its own affirmative action plan).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Private Satellite Partners, L.P. v. Lucky Cat Ltd.
Co. v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., 84 F.3d 560, 566 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 508 , 136 L.Ed.2d 398 (1996); accord Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A, 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
American Network, Inc. v. Access America/Connect Atlanta, Inc.
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990); Rothschild, 923 F.Supp. at 436 ; Executive Telecard, Ltd. v. Engelman, No. 95 Civ. 9505, 1996 WL 191967 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
Baron Philippe De Rothschild v. Paramount Distillers, Inc.
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990); Executive Telecard, Ltd. v. Engelman, No. 95 Civ. 9505, 1996 WL 191967 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y.
cited
Cited "see"
Lancaster v. Züfle
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Kelly v. Boeing Petroleum Services, Inc.
See id. 16 . 900 F.2d 153 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990). 17 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Saratoga Harness Racing Inc. v. Veneglia
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990) (“[pjrior to discovery, a plaintiff challenged by a jurisdiction testing motion may defeat the motion by pleading in good faith ... legally sufficient allegations of jurisdiction.
cited
Cited "see"
Madden v. International Ass'n of Heat & Frost Insulators & Asbestos Workers
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Madden v. INTERN. ASS'N OF HEAT & FROST INSULATORS
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Honduras Aircraft Registry, Ltd. v. Government of Honduras
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Maynard
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2nd Cir.) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph
(2×)
See United States v. Dumford, 30 MJ 137 , 138 n.2 (CMA), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Goyette v. DCA Advertising Inc.
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Compania Naviera Perez Companc, S.A.C.F.I.M.F.A. (In Re New York Trap Rock Corp.)
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
A.I. Trade Finance, Inc. v. Petra Bank
Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd., 763 F.2d 55, 57 (2d Cir.1985); see Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 196-98 (2d Cir.) (discussing procedure for challenging personal jurisdiction), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Advance Coating Technology, Inc. v. LEP Chemical Ltd.
Accord Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A, 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.), cert denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Oaklawn Apartments
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990); Forsythe v. Overmyer, 576 F.2d 779, 781 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 188 , 58 L.Ed.2d 174 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Oaklawn Apartments
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990); Forsythe v. Overmyer, 576 F.2d 779, 781 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 864 , 99 S.Ct. 188 , 58 L.Ed.2d 174 (1978). 8 "When a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is decided on the basis of affidavits and other written materials, the plaintiff need only make a prima facie showing." Behagen, 744 F.2d at 733 (citations omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
United Bank of Kuwait, PLC v. James M. Bridges, Ltd.
See Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tang v. Rhode Island, Department of Elderly Affairs
See, e.g., Hawkins v. Hennepin Technical Ctr., 900 F.2d 153 , 155-56 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990) (holding that in a retaliation suit plaintiff should have been allowed to introduce evidence of the activities complained of and their disposition “beyond the *77 bare fact that a complaint was made”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eskofot A/S v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.
See, e.g., Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 854 , 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lipton v. the Nature Co.
See, e.g., Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990) (factors might include the existence of an express agency agreement, actions taken by a New York-based entity with respect to third parties that are binding on the foreign defendant, or solicitation by a non-profit New York entity for the benefit of a commonly-owned foreign corporation).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chalwest (Holdings) Limited v. Samuel L. Ellis
Co. v. Washington Mills Abrasive Co., 840 F.2d 843, 845 (11th Cir.1988)); see also Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A., 902 F.2d 194, 197 (2d Cir.) (where diversity jurisdiction challenged after discovery but prior to any hearing, “[i]f the defendant contests the plaintiff's factual allegations, then a hearing is required, at which the plaintiff must prove the existence of jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence."), cert. denied,-U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 150 , 112 L.Ed.2d 116 (1990). 4 . 843 F.2d at 492 ; see also Cable Home/Communication Corp. v. Network Prods., Inc., 902 F.2d 829 ,…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hayton
v.
Grayson
v.
Grayson
No. 90-212.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.