green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.3 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Smith v. McCleskey, Harriger, Brazill, & Graf, L.L.P.
Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. Phillips, 801 S.W.2d 523, 525 (Tex.1990); but see Mitchell v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, 786 S.W.2d 659, 662 (Tex.), cert. den’d, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 247 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990)(recognizing that the existence of a duty may involve a question of fact).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Thalheim v. Town of Greenwich
he trial judge . . . has the duty to deter and correct misconduct of attorneys with respect to their obligations as officers of the court to support the authority of the court and enable the trial to proceed with dignity
cited
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Gallow, No. 055145 (Mar. 30, 2001)
See generally Brannon v. State, 202 Miss. 571 , 582 , 29 So.2d 916 (1947)." In Re Dodson, 214 Conn. 344 , 349-50 , 572 A.2d 328 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 247 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
CFM of Connecticut, Inc. v. Chowdhury
See In re Dodson, 214 Conn. 344, 361 , 572 A.2d 328 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S. Ct. 247 , 112 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Ullmann v. State
See In re Dodson, 214 Conn. 344, 352 , 572 A.2d 328 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S. Ct. 247 , 112 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Traficante
See United States v. Penta, 898 F.2d 815 (1st Cir.), cert denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Winstar Corp. v. United States
See Education Assistance Corp. v. Cavazos, 902 F.2d 617, 629 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990) (citing POSSE and recognizing Congress’ power to amend a statute).
discussed
Cited "see"
Winstar Corporation v. United States
See Education Assistance Corp. v. Cavazos, 902 F.2d 617, 629 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990) (citing POSSE and recognizing Congress' power to amend a statute).
discussed
Cited "see"
Winstar Corp. v. United States
See Education Assistance Corp. v. Cavazos, 902 F.2d 617, 629 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990) (citing POSSE and recognizing Congress’ power to amend a statute).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nicholas Garcia and John O'valle, Jr.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Italiano, 894 F.2d 1280 , 1282 n.2 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gigante
See United States v. Gengo, 808 F.2d 1, 3 (2d Cir.1986)(“notice is the touchstone in deciding whether a superseding indictment substantially changes the original charges”); see also United States v. Italiano, 894 F.2d 1280, 1283 (11th Cir.)(notice is the “central policy underlying the statutes of limitations”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Graham v. Freese & Nichols, Inc.
Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. Phillips, 801 S.W.2d 523 (Tex.1990); see also Mitchell v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, 786 S.W.2d 659, 662 (Tex.), cert. den’d, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 247 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990)(recognizing that the existence of a duty is a question of law but that certain elements of duty may involve a question of fact).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aslanidis v. United States Lines, Inc.
See Alexander v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 952 F.2d 1215, 1226-27 (10th Cir.1991); see also Juzwin v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd., 900 F.2d 686 , 690 n. 4 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 204 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Emil Aslanidis v. United States Lines, Inc., United States Lines (s.a.), Inc., United States Lines, Inc., Reorganization Trust, United States Lines (s.a.), Inc., Reorganization Trust, Emil Aslanidis v. Brandeis Intsel & Co., Inc., Brandeis Division of Pechiney World Trade Usa, Inc., John Doe I, John Doe Ii, John Doe Iii, Samancor, Ltd., South African Container Depots, Ltd. And Rennies Freight Services, Ltd., Brandeis Intsel & Co., Inc. And Brandeis Division of Pechiney World Trade Usa, Inc., Third-Party-Plaintiffs v. Samancor, Ltd., South African Container Depots, Ltd. And Rennies Freight Services, Ltd., Third-Party-Defendants
See Alexander v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 952 F.2d 1215, 1226-27 (10th Cir.1991); see also Juzwin v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd., 900 F.2d 686 , 690 n. 4 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 204 (1990). 37 Rule 15(c), applicable at the time of the filing of the amended complaint, stated: 38 Whenever the claim or defense asserted in the amended pleading arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set forth in the original pleading, the amendment relates back to the date of the original pleading.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles Powers, Marguerite Powers v. The Southland Corporation T/a 7-Eleven Robert Yeager
See, e.g., Juzwin v. Asbestos Corp., 900 F.2d 686 (3d Cir.) (interlocutory appeal from denial of summary judgment motion based on statute of limitations under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b)), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 204 (1990); Hopkins v. Kelsey-Hayes, Inc., 628 F.2d 801 (3d Cir.1980) (same), vacated on other grounds, 455 U.S. 404 , 102 S.Ct. 1137 , 71 L.Ed.2d 250 (1982); Galvan v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp., 549 F.2d 281 (3d Cir.1977) (same); see also Johnson v. Burken, 930 F.2d 1202, 1207 (7th Cir.1991) (stating, in connection with a hypothetical on the law of the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John L. Cheek
Compare United States v. Glasser, 773 F.2d 1553, 1557 (11th Cir.1985) (intradistrict transfer excludable) with United States v. Penta, 898 F.2d 815, 818-19 (1st Cir.) (not excludable), cert. denied) 498 U.S. 896 , 111 S.Ct. 246 , 112 L.Ed.2d 205 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hackler
v.
Langenkamp
v.
Langenkamp
No. 90-71.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1990.
498 U.S. 896
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.