green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.4 score
“n only one occasion has the supreme court struck down a state statute as violative of the. foreign relations power”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
International Ass'n of Independent Tanker Owners v. Lowry
n only one occasion has the supreme court struck down a state statute as violative of the. foreign relations power
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Julio Ernesto Arias-Santana
we have repeatedly held, fed.r.crim.p. 30 means what it says.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. NEW YORK STATE DEPT. OF CORREC. SERVICES
See Dube v. State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 , 594-95 (2d Cir.1990) (recognizing that § 1983 does not abrogate the states' Eleventh Amendment immunity), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
See Dube v. State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 , 594-95 (2d Cir.1990) (recognizing that § 1983 does not abrogate the states’ Eleventh Amendment immunity), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sampson
(2×)
See United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 27 (1st Cir.) (Opinion by Breyer, J., rejecting distinction based on fact that containers left on defendant's lawn and not on curb itself), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Emma v. Schenectady City School District
Accord Dube v. State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 , 599 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied sub nom., Wharton v. Dube, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harel v. Rutgers, State University
See Dube v. State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 (2d Cir.1990), cert, denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991); ‘Goodisman v. Lytle, 724 F.2d 818 (9th Cir.1984); Beitzell v. Jeffrey, 643 F.2d 870 (1st Cir. 1981); Kilcoyne v. Morgan, 664 F.2d 940 (4th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 456 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1976 , 72 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodriguez
See United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 24 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Manning
See United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 25-26 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991), and overruled on other grounds by Bailey, - U.S. at -, 116 S.Ct. at 509 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Andreucci v. City of New Haven
See Dube v. State Univ. of N.Y., 900 F.2d 587 , 599 (2d Cir.1990) (entitlement to consideration of criteria not a protected interest), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991); see also Gotlob v. Beyard, 887 F.Supp. 26, 30 (D.Conn.1993) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Griswold v. Com.
See United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22 (1st Cir.) (court relying in part on presentence report which indicated that defendant was represented by counsel), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Field
See United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 29 (1st Cir.) (applying Taylor), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Henry v. National Ass'n of Air Traffic Specialists, Inc.
See Reuber v. Food Chemical News, Inc., 925 F.2d 703 , 708 *1211 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patrone v. United States
See United ______ ___ ______ States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 29 (1st Cir.), cert. ______ _________ _____ denied, 111 S. Ct. 2813 (1991); see also United States v. ______ ___ ____ _____________ Bregnard, 951 F.2d 457, 460 (1st Cir. 1991) (uncontested ________ presentence report description of prior convictions may form sufficient basis for determining whether prior offense is a generically violent crime under Taylor), cert. denied, 112 S. ______ _____ ______ Ct. 2939 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Patrone v. United States
See United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 29 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 2813 (1991); see also United States v. Bregnard, 951 F.2d 457, 460 (1st Cir. 1991) (uncontested presentence report description of prior convictions may form sufficient basis for determining whether prior offense is a generically violent crime under Taylor), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 2939 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas J. Curran
See United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 29 (1st Cir.) (“presentence reports are normally considered reliable sources of information.... [Cjourts can, and do, commonly take as true facts stated in pre-sentence reports when they are not challenged”) (emphasis in original) (citing cases), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991); see also United States v. Zuleta-Alvarez, 922 F.2d 33, 36 (1st Cir.1990) (“The sentencing court is free to rely upon outside evidence, including hearsay evidence that has never been subject to cross-examination.”) (citing cases), cer…
discussed
Cited "see"
Finley v. National Endowment for the Arts
See Dube v. State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 , 598 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991); Levin v. Harleston, 770 F.Supp. 895, 921 (S.D.N.Y.1991); cf. Keyishian, 385 U.S. at 605-606 , 87 S.Ct. at 685 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. Rao
Bd. of Trs., 597 F.2d 1104 , 1109 (7th Cir.1979); see also Dube v. The State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991); Goodisman v. Lytle, 724 F.2d 818 (9th Cir.1984); Beitzell v. Jeffrey, 643 F.2d 870 (1st Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bryant v. New York State Department of Correction Services Albany
The Report correctly concludes that “it is beyond dispute that the State of New York and its agencies have never consented to be sued in federal court.” 5 Report at 4; See also Dube v. State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 , 594-95 (2d Cir.1990), cert denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
LaFleur v. Wallace State Community College
See also Dube v. State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 , 594 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jungels v. State University College of New York
Id. at 102-03 , 104 S.Ct. at 909 ; see also, Dube v. State University of New York, 900 F.2d 587, 595 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ramirez-Ferrer
See, e.g., United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 25-26 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. at 2813 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Felipe Ramirez-Ferrer, United States v. Jorge L. Suarez-Maya, United States v. Raul Troche-Matos
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 25-26 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Troche Matos
See, e.g., United States v. Wilkinson, 926 ___ ____ _____________ _________ F.2d 22, 25-26 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. at 2813 ____________ (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Komlosi v. The New York State Office Of Mental Retardation And Developmental Disabilities
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546-47 , 69 S.Ct. 1221, 1225-26 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949), the Supreme Court has expressly "h[e]ld that States and state entities that claim to be 'arms of the State' may take advantage of the collateral order doctrine to appeal a district court order denying a claim of Eleventh Amendment immunity." Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, --- U.S. ----, ----, 113 S.Ct. 684, 689 , 121 L.Ed.2d 605 (1993); see also Dube v. State Univ., 900 F.2d 587 , 594 (2d Cir.1990) (such an appeal may be taken if issue can be decided as a question of law) (collecting cases)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Komlosi v. New York State Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546-47 , 69 S.Ct. 1221, 1225-26 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949), the Supreme Court has expressly “h[e]ld that States and state entities that claim to be ‘arms of the State’ may take advantage of the collateral order doctrine to appeal a district court order denying a claim of Eleventh Amendment immunity.” Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, — U.S.-,-, 113 S.Ct. 684, 689 , 121 L.Ed.2d 605 (1993); see also Dube v. State Univ., 900 F.2d 587 , 594 (2d Cir.1990) (such an appeal may be taken if issue can be decided as a question of law) (collecting cases)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cordero Garcia
See United States v. Ruo, 943 F.2d 1274, 1276 (11th Cir.1991); United States v. Gallman, 907 F.2d 639, 643 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 908 , 111 S.Ct. 1110 , 113 L.Ed.2d 219 (1991); see also United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 28 (1st Cir.) (“Since the number of felony cases where a defendant lacks counsel must be small ..., a sentencing court may permissibly infer from the record of the conviction that the conviction was not obtained unconstitutionally provided the record contains no reason to believe the contrary.”), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nicholson v. Promotors on Listings
See, e.g., Reuber v. Food Chemical News, Inc., 925 F.2d 703, 708-09 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1212 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991) (scientist employed by a firm under contract with the National Cancer Institute was a limited purpose public figure); Clyburn, 903 F.2d at 31 (owner of consulting firm which frequently contracted with the D.C. government was a limited purpose public figure); Trotter, 818 F.2d at 434 (president of a private business involved with labor violence was a limited-purpose public figure).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Arcadi v. Nestle Food Corp.
See, e.g., Dube v. State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 , 597 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arcadi v. Nestle Food Corporation
See, e.g., Dube v. State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 , 597 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991). 8 Sections 206 and 207 of Title 29 provide for minimum and overtime wages for employees. 29 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kelly J. Jackson
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Oduloye, 924 F.2d 116, 118-19, n. 1 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211 , 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McFadden
See, e.g., United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22 , ___ ____ ______________ _________ 26 (1st Cir.) (conviction sustained where circumstances allowed jury to find that defendant "intended the guns for protection"), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 2813 (1991); United ____________ ______ States v. Hadfield, 918 F.2d 987, 998 (1st Cir. 1990) ______ ________ (conviction sustained "so long as one purpose in situating -15- 15 the weapon nearby was to protect the narcotics enterprise"), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 2062 (1991); United States v. _____________ _____________ Payero, 888 F.2d 928, 929 (1st Cir. 19…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McFadden
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 26 (1st Cir.) (conviction sustained where circumstances allowed jury to find that defendant "intended the guns for protection"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991); United States v. Hadfield, 918 F.2d 987, 998 (1st Cir.1990) (conviction sustained "so long as one purpose in situating the weapon nearby was to protect the narcotics enterprise"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2062 , 114 L.Ed.2d 466 (1991); United States v. Payero, 888 F.2d 928, 929 (1st Cir.1989) (conviction possible where firearm gave d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William J. Johnson
See, e.g., United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 28 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991); see also Easterling, 921 F.2d at 1077 (factual determinations at sentencing under preponderance of the evidence standard).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ramon Castro-Lara, United States of America v. Abraham Objio Sarraff
See, e.g., Plummer, 964 F.2d at 1253-54 (presence of unloaded gun and separately stored ammunition in defendant’s vehicle was sufficient to convict under section 924(c)(1)); United States v. Eaton, 890 F.2d 511, 512 (1st Cir.1989) (similar; firearm was in defendant’s vehicle), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 906 , 110 S.Ct. 1927 , 109 L.Ed.2d 291 (1990); see also United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 25 (1st Cir.) (fact that drugs and gun were in the same bag supported conclusion that defendant had control over gun and that gun facilitated the crime), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2813 , 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spuler v. Pickar
See also Dube v. The State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991); Goodisman v. Lytle, 724 F.2d 818 (9th Cir.1984); Beitzell v. Jeffrey, 643 F.2d 870 (1st Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spuler v. Pickar
See also Dube v. The State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991); Goodisman v. Lytle, 724 F.2d 818 (9th Cir.1984); Beitzell v. Jeffrey, 643 F.2d 870 (1st Cir.1981). 19 Spuler nonetheless asserts that he was entitled to a non-arbitrary and capricious decision on tenure.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spuler v. Pickar
See also Dube v. The State Univ. of New York, 900 F.2d 587 (2d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991); Goodisman v. Lytle, 724 F.2d 818 (9th Cir.1984); Beitzell v. Jeffrey, 643 F.2d 870 (1st Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Delta Chemical Corp. v. Ocean County Utilities Authority
See also Trojan Technologies, Inc. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 916 F.2d 903 , 912 n. 17 (3rd Cir.1990), cert. den. — US. —, 111 S.Ct. 2814 , 115 L.Ed.2d 986 (1991), noting that 11 states have some form of “Buy-American” legislation, upholding the “Buy-American” provisions of the Pennsylvania Steel Products Procurement Act, Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 73, §§ 1881-1887 (Purdon Supp.1991), against preemption, Commerce Clause and foreign affairs powers challenges.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bernal-Rodriguez
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-8018.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 1991.
Cited by 86 opinions | Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1) · W.D. Washington (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.