green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
First National Insurance v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Bates v. Cook, 615 F.Supp. 662, 672-73 (M.D.Fla.1984): United States v. Siegel, 472 F.Supp. 440 , 442 n. 4 (N.D.Ill.1979); United States v. Certain Land and Interests in Property, 225 F.Supp. 338, 341 (M.D.Tenn.1964); Cf. Helfand v. Gerson, 105 F.3d 530, 535 (9th Cir.1997) (explaining division among courts over whether judicial estoppel applies only to inconsistent factual positions, or inconsistent legal positions as well); but see In re Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637, 642-42 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990) (applying judicial estoppel to legal positions as…
discussed
Cited "but see"
First Nat. Ins. Co. v. FDIC
Bates v. Cook, 615 F.Supp. 662, 672-73 (M.D.Fla.1984): United States v. Siegel, 472 F.Supp. 440 , 442 n. 4 (N.D.Ill. 1979); United States v. Certain Land and Interests in Property, 225 F.Supp. 338, 341 (M.D.Tenn.1964); Cf. Helfand v. Gerson, 105 F.3d 530, 535 (9th Cir.1997) (explaining division among courts over whether judicial estoppel applies only to inconsistent factual positions, or inconsistent legal positions as well); but see In re Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637, 642-42 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990) (applying judicial estoppel to legal positions a…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Bernard Anderson
The police were not obligated to con tact his attorney und er these circum stances.” Howeve r, the State has since conceded in both its brief and at or al argum ents before this court that unde r the auth ority of Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 484- 85, 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981) and Minnick v. Mississippi, 498 U.S. 146 , 111 S.Ct. 48 6, 112 L .Ed.2d 4 89 (199 0), the De fendan t was d eprived of his rig hts while giving his third statem ent of Jan uary 11, 1 995, pu rsuant to the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.
cited
Cited "see"
In re Adams
See Matter of Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637 , 641 & n. 2 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990). (internal footnotes omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Supertrail Manufacturing Co.
See Matter of Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637 , 641 & n. 2 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990).[FN3] 179 F.3d at 205 .
cited
Cited "see"
Luedtke v. Commerce Bank N.A. (In Re Luedtke)
See Matter of Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637, 641-42 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied sub nom Cassidy v. C.I.R., 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Milton H. Greene Archives, Inc. v. CMG Worldwide, Inc.
See In re *1198 Coastal Plains, Inc., 179 F.3d 197, 205 (5th Cir.1999) ("Because the doctrine is intended to protect the judicial system, rather than the litigants, detrimental reliance by the opponent of the party against whom the doctrine is applied is not necessary," citing Matter of Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637 , 641 & n. 2 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990)); In re Chambers Dev.
cited
Cited "see"
Pryor v. Deberry (In Re Pryor)
See Matter of Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637 , 641 & n. 2 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990).[FN3] 179 F.3d at p. 205 .
cited
Cited "see"
Rumore v. Wamstad (In Re Waddell)
See Matter of Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637 , 641 & n. 2 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Browning Manufacturing v. Mims (In Re Coastal Plains, Inc.)
See Matter of Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637 , 641 & n. 2 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990). 3 *206 “The policies underlying the doctrine include preventing internal inconsistency, precluding litigants from playing fast and loose with the courts, and prohibiting parties from deliberately changing positions according to the exigencies of the moment.” United States v. McCaskey, 9 F.3d 368, 378 (5th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee Hosiery
See In re Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637, 641 (7th Cir.) (dismissing an entire claim sua sponte based on judicial estoppel because that doctrine "is intended to protect the courts rather than the litigants, so it follows that a court, even an appellate court, may raise the estoppel on its own motion in an appropriate case”) (footnote omitted), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990); Salahuddin v. Jones, 992 F.2d 447, 449 (2d Cir.) (affirming sua sponte dismissal of entire claim based on res judicata grounds as "not only appropriate but virtually mandatory in this case, whet…
cited
Cited "see"
TriStrata Technology, Inc. v. Neoteric Cosmetics, Inc.
See Patterson v. F.B.I., 893 F.2d 595, 604 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 633, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1015 Ruth C. Helfand Mark Seidenberg, as Attorney-In-Fact for Ruth C. Helfand, Real Party in Interest v. Mervyn Gerson an Individual Gerson, Grekin and Wynhoff, a Professional Law Corporation
See In re Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637, 641-42 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990); Hardwick v. Cuomo, 891 F.2d 1097 , 1105 n. 14 (3d Cir.1989); Patriot Cinemas, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 834 F.2d 208, 214-15 (1st Cir.1987); Allen v. Zurich Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Helfand v. Gerson
See In re Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637, 641-42 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990); Hardwick v. Cuomo, 891 F.2d 1097 , 1105 n. 14 (3d Cir.1989); Patriot Cinemas, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp., 834 F.2d 208, 214-15 (1st Cir.1987); Allen v. Zurich Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
UNR Industries, Inc. v. Bloomington Factory Workers
See In the Matter of Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637, 642 (7th Cir.) (application of judicial estoppel within a court’s sound discretion), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Manna v. United States Department of Justice
See Patterson v. F.B.I., 893 F.2d 595 , 599 n. 7 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990); Vaughn, 484 F.2d at 827 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gillotti
See, Patterson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 893 F.2d 595, 603 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990) (agencies are required to demonstrate that any and all records maintained on an individual’s exercise of First Amendment rights are relevant to an authorized law enforcement activity of the agency, and that there exists a sufficient basis for the maintenance of such records); MacPherson v. Internal Revenue Service, 803 F.2d 479, 484 (9th Cir.1986) (court should make a case-by-case analysis as to whether an agency’s actions were pertinent to a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Normandy Apartments, Ltd. v. United States
See also In re Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637, 641 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, sub nom., Cassidy v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990) ("Judicial estoppel is a doctrine intended to prevent the perversion of the judicial process.”); Konstantinidis v. Chen, 626 F.2d 933, 938 (D.C.Cir.1980) (rule is intended to prevent "improper use of judicial machinery"); Scarano v. Centr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Global Relief Foundation, Inc. v. O'NEILL
See also Patterson v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 893 F.2d 595, 599-600 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990); United States v. Ott, 827 F.2d 473, 475 (9th Cir.1987); United States v. Belfield, 692 F.2d 141, 147 (D.C.Cir.1982); and United States v. Nicholson, 955 F.Supp. 588, 592 (E.D.Va.1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. United States
See also Transohio Savings Bank, 967 F.2d at 618 ("[0]ne who wishes to obtain a contractual right against the sovereign that is immune from the effect of future changes in law must make sure that the contract confers such a right in unmistakable terms.”)(quoting Western Fuels-Utah, Inc., v. Lujan, 895 F.2d 780, 789 (D.C.Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 811 , 111 S.Ct. 47 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990), and cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990)); Statesman Sav.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Civil Liberties Union and Larry Schack v. The Florida Bar and the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission
Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2264, at 747 (1970); see also Matter of Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637 , 640 n. 1 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 812 , 111 S.Ct. 48 , 112 L.Ed.2d 24 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carteret Savings Bank, Fa v. Office Of Thrift Supervision
As the Supreme Court has recently stated, sovereign power " 'is an enduring presence that governs all contracts subject to the sovereign's jurisdiction, and will remain intact unless surrendered in unmistakable terms.' " Bowen v. Public Agencies Opposed to Social Security Entrapment, 477 U.S. 41, 52 , 106 S.Ct. 2390, 2397 , 91 L.Ed.2d 35 (1986) (quoting Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe, 455 U.S. 130, 148 , 102 S.Ct. 894, 907 , 71 L.Ed.2d 21 (1982) (emphasis added)); see also Western Fuels-Utah, Inc. v. Lujan, 895 F.2d 780, 789 (D.C.Cir.) (leases granting right to mine coal on federal lands co…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carteret Savings Bank, FA v. Office of Thrift Supervision
As the Supreme Court has recently stated, sovereign power “ ‘is an enduring presence that governs all contracts subject to the sovereign’s jurisdiction, and will remain intact unless surrendered in unmistakable terms. ’ ” Bowen v. Public Agencies Opposed to Social Security Entrapment, 111 U.S. 41, 52, 106 S.Ct. 2390, 2397 , 91 L.Ed.2d 35 (1986) (quoting Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe, 455 U.S. 130, 148 , 102 S.Ct. 894, 907 , 71 L.Ed.2d 21 (1982) (emphasis added)); see also Western Fuels-Utah, Inc. v. Lujan, 895 F.2d 180, 189 (D.C.Cir.) (leases granting right to mine coal on federa…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas
v.
CASSIDY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
v.
CASSIDY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
No. 89-1734.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
111 S. Ct. 48
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
Denied.