green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.7 score
“a bullet fired at an arresting officer standing outside a window is as deadly as one that is projected from one room to another.”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. McCants
a bullet fired at an arresting officer standing outside a window is as deadly as one that is projected from one room to another.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Spencer
See United States v. Hoyos, 892 F.2d 1387, 1397 (9th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 825 , 111 S. Ct. 80 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Q. Cochran
(2×)
See id. at 1289-90 (citing United States v. Thomas, 893 F.2d 1066 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 826 , 111 S.Ct. 80 , 112 L.Ed.2d 53 (1990)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Arch
See *1304 United States v. Hoyos, 892 F.2d 1387, 1397 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 825 , 111 S.Ct. 80 , 112 L.Ed.2d 52 (1990); see also United States v. Oguns, 921 F.2d 442, 446-47 (2d Cir.1990); United States v. Delgado, 903 F.2d 1495, 1502 (11th Cir.1990), cert. den. 498 U.S. 1028 , 111 S.Ct. 681 , 112 L.Ed.2d 673 (1991); United States v. Sheikh, 654 F.2d 1057, 1071 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 1617 , 71 L.Ed.2d 852 (1983), overruled on other grounds by United States v. Zuniga-Salinas, 952 F.2d 876 (5th Cir.1992) (en banc); United States v. Robinson, 775 F…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Allan Fuentes Sosa, United States of America v. Jaime Espinoza Leon, Aka: Jamie Leon Espinoza, United States of America v. Miguel Ortiz Pedraza
See United States v. Hoyos, 892 F.2d 1387, 1393 (9th Cir.1989) (evidence of driving typical of counter-surveillance techniques probative in case to determine higher standard of probable cause), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 80 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. $749,968.00 U.S. Currency and 100 Pieces of Gold, Aaron Benor, Claimant-Appellant
See United States v. Hoyos, 892 F.2d 1387, 1393 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 80 (1990). 4 Benor argues the stop was converted into an arrest for which the officers lacked probable cause.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Philip Walsh
See United States v. Hoyos, 892 F.2d 1387, 1400 (9th Cir.1989) (as amended), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 80 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven Douglas Green
See United States v. Thomas, 893 F.2d 1066, 1071 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 80 (1990). 12 Green contends that evidence of his gun possession was highly prejudicial and of little probative value.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Floyd Balough
See United States v. Hoyos, 892 F.2d 1387, 1400 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 80 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Strauss
See State v. Palomo, 113 Wn.2d 789, 797 , 783 P.2d 575 (1989) (admission of an out-of-court declarant's statements under the excited utterance exception did not violate the defendant's constitutional right to confrontation), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 826 , 112 L.Ed.2d 53 , 111 S.Ct. 80 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ryan Keith Turner
See United States v. Hoyos, 892 F.2d 1387 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied 111 S.Ct. 80 (1990) 3 U.S.S.G. 3B1.1(c) states that "If the defendant was an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor in any criminal activity other than described in (a) or (b), increase by 2 levels." Sections (a) and (b) provide for four or three level enhancements if the defendant was the leader of a group of five or more participants or the manager or supervisor of such a group, respectively. 4 Section 2B3.1(b)(2)(F) states that "if an express threat of death was made, increase [overall offense level] by 2 levels."
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodney Butler
See United States v Hoyos, 892 F2d 1387, 1393 (9th Cir1989), cert denied, 111 SCt 80 (1990). 4 A search incident to a lawful arrest is an exception to the warrant requirement.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hutcheson
See State v. Palomo, 113 Wn.2d 789, 794 , 783 P.2d 575 (1989), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 80 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlos Arturo Ocampo, United States of America v. Jorge Arango, United States of America v. Jerald James Donato
See United States v. Hoyos, 892 F.2d 1387, 1392-93 (9th Cir.1989) (Hoyos), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 80 , 112 L.Ed.2d 52 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Darrell Paul Bertrand, United States of America v. John Owen Rapae
See United States v. Hoyos, 892 F.2d 1387, 1392 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 80 , 112 L.Ed.2d 52 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rafael Rodriguez v. Clark Color Laboratories
See United States v. Thomas, 893 F.2d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 80 , 112 L.Ed.2d 53 (1990); United States v. Smith, supra, 795 F.2d at 845-46 ; United States v. Lang-ford, 688 F.2d 1088, 1096-97 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 959 , 103 S.Ct. 2433 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1319 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Davis
VI; Wash. Const. art I, § 22; Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836, 845 , 110 S.Ct. 3157 , 111 L.Ed.2d 666 (1990). [2] State v. Davis, 141 Wash.2d 798 , 10 P.3d 977 (2000). [3] Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 66 , 100 S.Ct. 2531 , 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980). [4] State v. Strauss, 119 Wash.2d 401, 417 , 832 P.2d 78 (1992). [5] 448 U.S. 56, 66 , 100 S.Ct. 2531 , 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980). [6] State v. Palomo, 113 Wash.2d 789, 796-98 , 783 P.2d 575 (1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 826 , 111 S.Ct. 80 , 112 L.Ed.2d 53 (1990). [7] State v. Jackson, 113 Wash.App. 762 , 54 P.3d 739 (2002). [8] Davis, 141 Wash.2d at 84…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lorenzo Cortez Colbert
See, e.g., United States v. Hoyos, 892 F.2d 1387, 1397 (9th Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 825 , 111 S.Ct. 80 , 112 L.Ed.2d 52 (1990); United States v. Jackson, 700 F.2d 181, 189 (5th Cir.) (quoting United States v. Sheikh, 654 F.2d 1057, 1071 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 1617 , 71 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982)), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 842 , 104 S.Ct. 139 , 78 L.Ed.2d 132 (1983). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Demeter
See also United States v. Hoyos, 892 F.2d 1387, 1393 (9th Cir.1989) (experienced narcotics officers attribute “special significance” to the use of beepers and public telephones when employed by persons driving in a manner typical of counter-surveillance techniques), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 80 , 112 L.Ed.2d 52 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hector Martin Ramos
See United States v. Baker, 790 F.2d 1437, 1438 (9th Cir.1986); see also United States v. Hoyos, 892 F.2d 1387, 1400 (9th Cir.1989) (quoting Kay and applying “manifest injustice” standard to review of lower court’s refusal to permit withdrawal of plea after sentencing of co-defendant but before sentencing of defendant seeking to withdraw plea), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 80 , 112 L.Ed.2d 52 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Fitzgerald Rogers
See, e.g., United States v. Hoyos, 892 F.2d 1387, 1392 (9th Cir.1989) (“Narcotics dealers ... use beepers and public telephones in plying their illicit trade.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 80 , 112 L.Ed.2d 52 (1990); United States v. Rollins, 862 F.2d 1282 , 1286 n. 1 (7th Cir.1988) (“[D]rug traffickers tend to use telephone beepers as an effective means of communicati[on].”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 2084 , 104 L.Ed.2d 648 (1989); United States v. Zapata-Tamallo, 833 F.2d 25, 28 (2d Cir.1987) (per curiam) (similar).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Minton
v.
Key Serve Group
v.
Key Serve Group
No. 89-7174.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
Published
Citer courts: D. South Carolina (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.