green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.2 score
“as to offenses in which the jury plays no role in sentencing, the jury will not be advised of the possible penalties.”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Marquard v. State
as to offenses in which the jury plays no role in sentencing, the jury will not be advised of the possible penalties.
cited
Cited "see"
Nixon v. State
See Nixon v. Florida, 502 U.S. 854 , 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Nixon v. State
See Nixon v. Florida, 502 U.S. 854 , 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Nixon v. State
See Nixon v. Florida, 502 U.S. 854 , 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Brandon v. State
See Nixon v. State, 572 So.2d 1336, 1345 (Fla.1990), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 854 , 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beverly v. State
(2×)
See U.S. v. Jimenez, 928 F.2d 356 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 854 , 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 129 (1991) and U.S. v. Johnson, 973 F.2d 857 (10th Cir.1992), both quoting from United States v. Williamsburg Check Cashing Corp., 905 F.2d 25, 28 (2d Cir.1990): “[A]n agreement to keep the judge ignorant of pertinent information cannot be enforceable, because a sentencing court ‘must be permitted to consider any and all information that might reasonably bear on the proper sentence for the particular defendant, given the crime committed.’ ” In enacting the Federal Sentencing Guidelin…
cited
Cited "see"
Broche v. State
See Nixon v. State, 572 So.2d 1336, 1340 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 854 , 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Leslie Russell
See United State v. Lonedog, 929 F.2d 568, 570 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 854 , 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 129 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Knight v. State
See Nixon v. State, 572 So.2d 1336, 1345 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 854 , 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 128 *598 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bins
See United States v. Lonedog, 929 F.2d 568, 570 (10th Cir.) (“defendant’s right to confrontation may be violated if the trial court precludes an entire relevant area of cross-examination”), cert, denied, 502 U.S. 854 , 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 129 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Harvey v. Dugger
See Nixon v. State, 572 So.2d 1336 (Fla. 1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 854 , 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Scott v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Lonedog, 929 F.2d 568, 570 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 854 , 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 129 (1991); United States v. Jorgenson, 451 F.2d 516, 519 (10th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 922 , 92 S.Ct. 959 , 30 L.Ed.2d 793 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gray
See United States v. Lonedog, 929 F.2d 568, 570 (10th Cir.) (“defendant’s right to confrontation may be violated if the trial court precludes an entire relevant area of cross-examination”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 129 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vidal Beltran-Penuelas, United States of America v. Arturo Beltran-Felix
See id.
discussed
Cited "see"
Shamrock Drilling Fluids, Inc. v. Miller
See United States v. Lonedog, 929 F.2d 568, 576 (10th Cir.) (recognizing the assumption that juries follow their instructions), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 129 (1991); Whiteley v. OKC Corp., 719 F.2d 1051, 1059 (10th Cir.1983) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shamrock Drilling Fluids, Inc. v. Miller
See United States v. Lonedog, 929 F.2d 568, 576 (10th Cir.) (recognizing the assumption that juries follow their instructions), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 129 (1991); Whiteley v. OKC Corp., 719 F.2d 1051, 1059 (10th Cir.1983) (same). 27 Instruction 70 was intended to remind the jury that it had to examine the evidence and find at least one of the special circumstances in Instruction 64 before it could conclude that Liberty had a duty of disclosure, and thus incur liability for failing to act.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Joseph Hutchinson
See United States v. Jimenez, 928 F.2d 356, 364-65 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 164 (1991). 11 Defendant next asserts that the district court should have corrected the PSR to reflect that he provided substantial assistance to the government and that he was less culpable than codefendant Steele.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Djinn Farrar, United States of America v. Oin Glenn Grove
See United States v. Harrington, 923 F.2d 1371, 1374 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joaquin Garcia, Joaquin Garcia v. Margaret C. Hambrick, Warden, Metropolitan Detention Center Los Angeles
See United States v. Harrington, 923 F.2d 1371, 1373 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruce Loren Latimer
(2×)
See United States v. Harrington, 923 F.2d 1371, 1375 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Barnes
See United States v. Lonedog, 929 F.2d 568, 570 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 164 (1991). 13 Mr. Barnes asserts the Government improperly vouched for and bolstered the credibility concerning three of its witnesses. 14 The first incident relates to the testimony of the Government's witness, Rebecca Glover.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Scott McCurdy United States of America v. Pamela McCurdy
See United States v. Harrington, 923 F.2d 1371, 1374 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991)
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jolene Phillips, United States of America v. Jolene Phillips
See United States v. Loera, 923 F.2d 725, 728 (9th Cir.) ("A rational trier of fact could have found that Loera's conduct in driving while in a state of intoxication showed a reckless disregard for the safety of others."), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 164 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Barry Dean Boatner
See United States v. Jimenez, 928 F.2d 356 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, Jimenez v. United States, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 129 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Orestes Luciano Abreu
(2×)
See United States v. Jimenez, 928 F.2d 356, 364 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 129 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roberto Cairo
See United States v. Harrington, 923 F.2d 1371, 1373 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 164 (1991); cf. Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 497-98 (1983) (plurality opinion); United States v. Ricardo D., 912 F.2d 337, 340 (9th Cir.1990). 5 (2) Was Cairo Illegally Detained in the Garage?
cited
Cited "see"
Nixon v. State
See Nixon v. State, 572 So.2d 1336 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991); Keys v. State, 500 So.2d 134 (Fla.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. State
See Nixon v. State, 572 So.2d 1336, 1341 (Fla. 1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991); State v. Cumbie, 380 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 1980); Deliford v. State, 505 So.2d 523, 524 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene Mervin Sides
See United States v. Lonedog, 929 F.2d 568, 570 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 164 , — L.Ed.2d-(1991); Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stephen Booker v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
See, e.g., Nixon v. State, 572 So.2d 1336 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 854 , 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tweedy v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 973 F.2d 857, 860 (10th Cir.1992) (quoting United States v. Jimenez, 928 F.2d 356, 363 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 854 , 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 129 (1991)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Booker v. State
See, e.g., Nixon v. State, 572 So.2d 1336 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 854 , 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Campbell v. State
See, e.g., Nixon v. State, 572 So.2d 1336 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 854 , 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 128 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jonathan Jay Pollard
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Jimenez, 928 F.2d 356, 363 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 164 , 116 L.Ed.2d 129 (1991); United States v. Moscahlaidis, 868 F.2d 1357, 1360 (3d Cir.1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McMeans
v.
Township of Waterford
v.
Township of Waterford
No. 90-8494.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Florida (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.