green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.2 score
“property possessed by either spouse during or on dissolution of marriage is presumed to be community property.”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Burch
property possessed by either spouse during or on dissolution of marriage is presumed to be community property.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bobby Lee Hopper
(2×)
See United States v. Lato, 934 F.2d 1080, 1083 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 271 , 116 L.Ed.2d 224 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Pompey
Accord, United States v. Lato, 934 F.2d 1080, 1083 (9th Cir.) cert. denied — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 271 , 116 L.Ed.2d 224 (1991) (obstruction of state investigation prior to initiation of federal probe properly considered for purposes of upward adjustment of the offense level pursuant to § 3C1.1); United States v. Hager, 807 F.Supp. 1238, 1241 (S.D.W.Va.1992) (defendant’s acts of obstruction made during an investigation begun by state officials and later turned over to federal authorities for completion and prosecution, may be used for sentencing purposes in determining the federal offense lev…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter Charles Acuna
See United States v. Lato, 934 F.2d 1080, 1083 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 271 , 116 L.Ed.2d 224 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles E. Emery
See United States v. Lato, 934 F.2d 1080, 1082-83 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 271 , 116 L.Ed.2d 224 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Emery
See United States v. Lato, 934 F.2d 1080, 1082-83 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 271 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Emery
See United States v. Lato, 934 F.2d 1080, 1082-83 (9th Cir.), ___ _____________ ____ cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 271 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Professional Helicopter Pilots Ass'n v. Denison
See United States v. Grizzle, 933 F.2d 943, 947 (11th Cir.1991) (employee contributions to employee fund were funds of employee benefit plan within meaning of *1454 statute prohibiting embezzlement of such funds, even though employer and president never turned over such contributions to plan), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 271 , 116 L.Ed.2d 223 (1991); Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Solmsen, 671 F.Supp. 938 (E.D.N.Y.1987) (holding that diversion of employee contributions before they reached investment account constituted misuse of plan assets).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trustees of the Operating Engineers' Local 324 Pension & Fringe Benefit Funds v. Glencorp, Inc.
Funds v. Steel Enterprises, Inc., 2009 WL 3645633 , **4-5 (E.D.Mich.2009) (Rosen, J); cf. Trustees of Mich. Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund v. Accura Concrete Walls, Inc., 408 F.Supp.2d 370, 371 (E.D.Mich.2005) (Cohn, J.); see also United States v. Grizzle, 933 F.2d 943, 946-48 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 897 , 112 S.Ct. 271 , 116 L.Ed.2d 223 (1991) (money withheld for deposit into vacation fund was a plan asset); LoPresti v. Terwilliger, 126 F.3d 34 , 39 (2nd Cir.1997) (money withheld from employees’ paychecks for deposit into pension fund was a plan asset)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trustees of the Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds v. Nordstrom
Funds v. Steel Enterprises, Inc., 2009 WL 3645633 , **4-5 (E.D.Mich.2009) (Rosen, J); cf. Trustees of Mich. Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund v. Accura Concrete Walls, Inc., 408 F.Supp.2d 370, 371 (E.D.Mich.2005) (Cohn, J.); see also United States v. Grizzle, 933 F.2d 943, 946-48 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 897 , 112 S.Ct. 271 , 116 L.Ed.2d 223 (1991) (money withheld for deposit into vacation fund was a plan asset); LoPresti v. Terwilliger, 126 F.3d 34, 39 (2nd Cir.1997) (money withheld from employees’ paychecks for deposit into pension fund was a plan asset);…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Plumbers Local 98 Defined Benefit Pension Fund v. M & P Master Plumbers of Michigan, Inc.
See, e.g., Iron Workers’ Local No. 25 Pension Fund v. McGuire Steel Erection, Inc., 352 F.Supp.2d 794, 805 (E.D.Mich.2004); Operating Engineers’ Local 324 Fringe Benefit Funds v. Nicolas Equipment, LLC, 353 F.Supp.2d 851, 854 (E.D.Mich.2004); cf. Trustees of Mich. Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund v. Accura Concrete Walls, Inc., 408 F.Supp.2d 370, 371 (E.D.Mich.2005); see also United States v. Grizzle, 933 F.2d 943, 946-48 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 897 , 112 S.Ct. 271 , 116 L.Ed.2d 223 (1991) (money withheld for deposit into vacation fund was a plan asset)…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Haidar
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 91-5635.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.