green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Castillo
(2×)
FED.R.CRIM.P. 51(b) (emphasis added); see United States v. Vontsteen, 950 F.2d 1086, 1090-91 (5th Cir.) (applying Rule 51 in sentencing context), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1223 , 112 S.Ct. 3039 , 120 L.Ed.2d 908 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Simpson v. State
See United States v. McNeal, 955 F.2d 1067 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1223 , 112 S.Ct. 3039 , 120 L.Ed.2d 908 (1992)(guest who had no clothes or toothbrush on the premises was no more than a casual, transient visitor); United States v. Garcia, 741 F.2d 363 (11th Cir.l984)(visitor who was not an owner or lessee and who stored no personal belongings on the premises did not have sufficient “significant and current interest” in the premises to establish standing); State v. Conklin, 249 Neb. 727 , 545 N.W.2d 101 (1996)(occasional guest who had no ability to exclude others from the premi…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Guido Riascos-Suarez A/K/A Kennedy Diuza-Riascos
Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 104-05 , 100 S.Ct. 2556, 2561 , 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980); see United States v. McNeal, 955 F.2d 1067, 1073-75 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1223 , 112 S.Ct. 3039 , 120 L.Ed.2d 908 (1992); United States v. Sangineto-Miranda, 859 F.2d 1501, 1510 (6th Cir.1988). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bill McNeal v. United States
See United States v. McNeal, 955 F.2d 1067 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 3039 (1992). 4 In his motion to vacate, McNeal presented one ground for relief: ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, based upon counsel's failure to file a suggestion for rehearing en banc of this court's order and a petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Scott
(2×)
See United States v. Vontsteen, 950 F.2d 1086, 1089 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 3039 , 120 L.Ed.2d 908 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Izzarelli v. Rexene Products Co.
See United States v. Vontsteen, 950 F.2d 1086, 1091-92 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (failing to bring proper standard of review to court's attention until appellate oral argument is "unfortunate, but not fatal"), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 3039 , 120 L.Ed.2d 908 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Izzarelli v. Rexene Products Co.
See United States v. Vontsteen, 950 F.2d 1086, 1091-92 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (failing to bring proper standard of review to court's attention until appellate oral argument is "unfortunate, but not fatal"), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S. Ct. 3039 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walden v. McGinnes
See United States v. Vontsteen, 950 F.2d 1086, 1091 (5th Cir.) (en banc) ("We ordinarily have the discretion to decide legal issues that are not timely raised”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3039 , 120 L.Ed.2d 908 (1992); e.g., Atlantic Mut.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Curtis Delaskio Moore
See United States v. Vontsteen, 950 F.2d 1086, 1092 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3039 , 120 L.Ed.2d 908 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Barakett
Sentencing Departure Finally, Barakett challenges the basis for and reasonableness of the six-point increase in the offense level in the sentencing on counts three, four, six, seven, and nine.24 District courts may 20 United States v. Razo-Leora, 961 F.2d 1140 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Birdsell, 775 F.2d 645 (5th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1119 (1986); see Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b) ("Plain errors or defects affecting substantial rights may be noticed although they were not brought to the attention of the [trial] court."). 21 United States v. Vontsteen, 950 F.2d 1086, 1092 (5th Cir.) …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
St. Tammany Parish School Board v. State of Louisiana the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Louisiana Department of Education the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals v. Donna Slocum, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child Daniel Slocum Douglas Slocum, Individually and on Behalf of His Minor Child Daniel Slocum
See, e.g., United States v. Vontsteen, 950 F.2d 1086, 1091 (5th Cir.) (en banc) ("no party has the power to control our standard of review"), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1223 , 112 S.Ct. 3039 , 120 L.Ed.2d 908 (1992). 31 Our court has not considered the appropriate standard of review for such IDEA interlocutory orders.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
St. Tammany Parish School Board v. Louisiana
See, e.g., United States v. Vontsteen, 950 F.2d 1086, 1091 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (“no party has the power to control our standard of review”), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1223 , 112 S.Ct. 3039 , 120 L.Ed.2d 908 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Homero Alaniz-Alaniz
See also United States v. Vontsteen, 950 F.2d 1086, 1090 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied,U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3039 , 120 L.Ed.2d 908 (1992) (quoting Wayne R.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rodney Eugene Knowles
See, e.g., United States v. Vontsteen, 950 F.2d 1086, 1089 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (collecting cases), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3039 , 120 L.Ed.2d 908 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rodriguez
See also United States v. Vontsteen, 950 F.2d 1086, 1090 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 3039 , 120 L.Ed.2d 908 (1992) (quoting Wayne R.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vaden
v.
Lujan, Secretary of the Interior
v.
Lujan, Secretary of the Interior
No. 91-7783.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 29, 1992.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.