Brown v. Curators of the Univ. of Missouri, 502 U.S. 940 (1991).

discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Merckle GmbH v. Johnson & Johnson

D.N.J. · 1997 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low

unsupported allegations in memorandum and pleadings are insufficient to repel summary judgment

discussed Cited "see" Butler v. Rapides Foundation

W.D. La. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high

See Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 504-05 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991) (stating that, although the district court may not assess fees against counsel under Title VII, it could do so under FRCP 11 or § 1927).

discussed Cited "see" Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chester Holdings, Ltd.

D.N.J. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high

See Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 500 (3d Cir.) (noting that nonmovant must set forth “specific facts” and “may not rest upon mere allegations, general denials, or ... vague statements ... ”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991).

cited Cited "see" Harris v. SmithKline Beecham

E.D. Pa. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high

See Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 501 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991).

cited Cited "see" Scalzo v. Insalaco's Markets

M.D. Penn. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high

See Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 500 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991).

cited Cited "see" Opinion No.

Ark. Att'y Gen. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high

See Ryalls v. Pigott, 580 So.2d 1140 (Miss. 1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 (1991).

discussed Cited "see" Union Center Redevelopment Corp. v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

8th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high

See The Curators of Univ. of Missouri v. Brown, 809 S.W.2d 64, 65-67 (Mo.Ct.App.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 375 , 116 L.Ed.2d 326 (1991); Arata v. Monsanto Chemical Co., 351 S.W.2d 717, 721 (Mo.1961).

discussed Cited "see" Union Center Redevelopment Corporation v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

8th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high

See The Curators of Univ. of Missouri v. Brown, 809 S.W.2d 64, 65-67 (Mo.Ct.App.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 375 , 116 L.Ed.2d 326 (1991); Arata v. Monsanto Chemical Co., 351 S.W.2d 717, 721 (Mo.1961). 31 We affirm the judgment of the district court. 1 The Honorable George F. Gunn, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri 2 The Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970 was recodified at 49 U.S.C. § 24101 et seq., and reenacted as part of a general restructuring of the United States Code, which took effect on July 5, 1994.

discussed Cited "see" 70 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 247, 67 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,940, 43 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1022 Mary Corneveaux, and Cross-Appellee v. Cuna Mutual Insurance Group, And

10th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high

See Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 504 (3d Cir.) (recognizing Title VII "does not authorize assessment of fees against the loser's attorney"), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991); Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers, Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370 , 1374 n. 1 (6th Cir.1987) ("an award under section 1988 may only be charged against the losing party, not the party's attorney."); Hamer v. County of Lake, 819 F.2d 1362, 1370 (7th Cir.1987) ("[s]ection 1988 only authorizes the imposition of fees against parties to the litigation, not their attorneys."); Durrett v. J…

discussed Cited "see" Corneveaux v. CUNA Mutual Insurance Group

10th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high

See Quiroga, v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 504 (3d Cir.) (recognizing Title VII “does not authorize assessment of fees against the loser’s attorney”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991); Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers, Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370 , 1374 n. 1 (6th Cir.1987) (“an award under section 1988 may only be charged against the losing party, not the party’s attorney.”); Hamer v. County of Lake, 819 F.2d 1362, 1370 (7th Cir.1987) (“[s]ection 1988 only authorizes the imposition of fees against parties to the litigation, not their attorneys…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." SAMPLE v. U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

E.D. Pa. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low

See Kirlies, 560 F.3d at 161 ; see also Trap Rock Indus., Inc., 982 F.2d at 890 (“[The] non-moving party may not ‘rest upon mere allegations, general denials or . . . vague statements’” at the summary judgment stage) (quoting Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 500 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 (1991)) (second alteration in original).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Richardson v. Carrasco

S.D. Fla. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low

In Waco v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., the Supreme Court held that while the remand order itself was not appealable, the parties may appeal an order dismissing a claim that precedes and order of remand. 293 U.S. 140 , 55 S.Ct. 6 , 79 L.Ed. 244 (1934); see also Calderon v. Aerovias Nacionales de Colombia, 929 F.2d 599, 601-02 (11th Cir.), cert. denied 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991) (discussing Waco).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Peter Bay Owners Ass'n v. Stillman

D.V.I. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low

The non-moving party must “make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of [every] element essential to that party’s case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial.” Serbin, 96 F.3d at 69 n. 2 (quoting Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986)); see also Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 500 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991) (declaring that non-movant may not “rest upon mere allegations, general denials, or vague statements”).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." PETER BAY OWNERS ASS'N, INC. v. Stillman

D.V.I. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low

The non-moving party must "make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of [every] element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial." Serbin, 96 F.3d at 69 n. 2 (quoting Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986)); see also Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 500 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991) (declaring that non-movant may not "rest upon mere allegations, general denials, or vague statements").

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.

D. Kan. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low

Cottam v. First Baptist Church of Boulder, 756 F.Supp. 1433, 1439 (D.Colo.1991), aff'd, 962 F.2d 17 (10th Cir.1992) (Table); see Garrett v. Barnes, 961 F.2d 629, 632 (7th Cir.1992); Therrell v. Georgia Marble Holdings Corp., 960 F.2d 1555, 1569 (11th Cir.1992); Biodex Corp. v. Loredan Biomedical, Inc., 946 F.2d 850, 861-62 (Fed.Cir.1991), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 980 , 112 S.Ct. 2957 , 119 L.Ed.2d 579 (1992); see, e.g., Anderson v. United Telephone Co. of Kansas, 933 F.2d 1500, 1502 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 375 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991); Ware v. Unified School Dist. 492…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States Ex Rel. Haskins v. Omega Institute, Inc.

D.N.J. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low

The non-moving party must “make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of [every] element essential to that party’s case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial.” Serbin, 96 F.3d at 69 n. 2 (quoting Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986)); see also Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 500 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991) (declaring that nonmovant may not “rest upon mere allegations, general denials, or vague statements”).

cited Cited "see, e.g." Keenan v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University Agricultural & Mechanical College

M.D. La. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low

See also Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 501 (3rd Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991). 40 .

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Score Board, Inc. v. Upper Deck Co.

D.N.J. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low

Rather, the non-moving party must “make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of [every] element essential to that party’s case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial.” Serbin at 69 n. 2 (quoting Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986)); see also Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 500 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991) (declaring that a non-movant may not “rest upon mere allegations, general denials, or ... vague statements”).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gagliardi v. Omaha Property and Ins. Co.

D.N.J. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low

The non-moving party must “make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of [every] element essential to that party’s case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial.” Serbin, 96 F.3d at 69 n. 2 (quoting Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986)); see also Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 500 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991) (declaring that non-movant may not “rest upon mere allegations, general denials, or ... vague statements”).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Arc of New Jersey, Inc. v. State of NJ

D.N.J. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low

Rather, the non-moving party must “make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of [every] element essential to that party’s case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial.” Serbin at 69 n. 2 (quoting Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986)); see also Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 500 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991) (declaring that a non-movant may not “rest upon mere allegations, general denials, or ... vague statements”).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dirkes v. Borough of Runnemede

D.N.J. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low

Mamiye & Sons, Inc. v. Fidelity Bank, 813 F.2d 610, 618 (3d Cir.1987) (Becker, J., concurring), and not just “some metaphysical doubt as to material facts.” Matsushita, 475 U.S. at 586 , 106 S.Ct. at 1356 ; see also, Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 500 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991) (In opposing summary judgment, a non-movant may not “rest upon mere allegations, general denials, or ... vague statements.”); Schoch v. First Fidelity Bancorporation, 912 F.2d 654, 657 (3d Cir. 1990) (“unsupported allegations in [a non- *238 movant’…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." 69 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1328, 67 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,894 Dale Nelson, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Curiae

8th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low

See, e.g., Caudill v. Farmland Industries, Inc., 919 F.2d 83, 86-87 (8th Cir.1990) (close temporal proximity between filing of age discrimination charges and firing of plaintiff was only a "slender reed of evidence" for which "rank speculation" would be required to assume causal connection between the two events, in light of other evidence presented); see also Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 501 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991) ("inference based on timing alone" was insufficient in light of other evidence presented).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dale Nelson v. J.C. Penney Co.

8th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low

See, e.g., Caudill v. Farmland Industries, Inc., 919 F.2d 83, 86-87 (8th Cir.1990) (close temporal proximity between filing of age discrimination charges and firing of plaintiff was *347 only a “slender reed of evidence” for which “rank speculation” would be required to assume causal connection between the two events, in light of other evidence presented); see also Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc., 934 F.2d 497, 501 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 940 , 112 S.Ct. 376 , 116 L.Ed.2d 327 (1991) (“inference based on timing alone” was insufficient in light of other evidence presented).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Tutu Wells Contamination Litigation