green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
“lawhorn iii”
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
People v. Stanley
Assuming, without deciding, the court’s ruling was error (see People v. Fierro, supra, 1 Cal.4th at p. 241; but see Robinson v. Maynard (10th Cir. 1987) 829 F.2d 1501 , 1505, cert, denied 502 U.S. 970 [ 116 L.Ed.2d 463 , 112 S.Ct. 445 ]), it clearly was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
discussed
Cited "but see"
People v. Fierro
(2×)
Thus, assuming without deciding that defendant has a right to introduce evidence of the effect of a death sentence on his family (People v. Cooper, supra, 53 Cal.3d at p. 844, fn. 14; but see Robison v. Maynard (10th Cir. 1987) 829 F.2d 1501, 1505 , cert, denied _ U.S. _ [ 116 L.Ed.2d 463 , 112 S.Ct. 445 ]), that right was not violated. 7.
cited
Cited "see"
Bush v. State
See Ex parte Lawhorn, 581 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 970 , 112 S.Ct. 445 , 116 L.Ed.2d 463 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Bush
(2×)
See Ex parte Lawhorn , 581 So.2d 1179 (Ala. 1991), cert. denied , 502 U.S. 970 , 112 S.Ct. 445 , 116 L.Ed.2d 463 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Adkins
See Ex parte Lawhorn, 581 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1991) cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 445 , 116 L.Ed.2d 463 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Robison v. Maynard
See Robison v. Maynard, 943 F.2d 1216 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 445 , 116 L.Ed.2d 463 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Olan Randle Robison v. Gary Maynard, Warden, Olan Randle Robison v. Dan Reynolds, Warden Susan Loving, Attorney General, State of Oklahoma, Olan Randle Robison v. Gary Maynard
See Robison v. Maynard, 943 F.2d 1216 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 445 , 116 L.Ed.2d 463 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Broadnax v. State
See also Henry v. Wainwright, 721 F.2d 990, 995 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 993 , 104 S.Ct. 2374 , 80 L.Ed.2d 846 (1984) (wherein the court, in holding harmless the trial court's failure to instruct that aggravating circumstances must be found beyond a reasonable doubt, stated that `for the failure to give the instruction to be harmless, the evidence must be so overwhelming that the omission beyond a reasonable doubt did not contribute to the verdict')." Lawhorn v. State, 581 So.2d 1159, 1176-77 (Ala.Cr.App.1990), aff'd, 581 So.2d 1179 (Ala.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 970 , 112 S.Ct. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Whitehead v. State
See also Rule 9.3, Ala.R.Crim.P.' Taylor v. State, 666 So.2d 36, 66 (Ala.Cr.App. 1994), aff'd, 666 So.2d 73 (Ala.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1120 , 116 S.Ct. 928 , 133 L.Ed.2d 856 (1996). `Alabama appellate courts have time and again refused to hold it an abuse of discretion on the part of a trial court to allow a sheriff, police chief, or similarly situated person who will later testify to remain in the courtroom during trial.' Ex parte Lawhorn, 581 So.2d 1179, 1181 (Ala.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 970 , 112 S.Ct. 445 , 116 L.Ed.2d 463 (1991) (citing several Alabama cases holding to same effe…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lawhorn
v.
Alabama
v.
Alabama
No. 91-5734.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 18, 1991.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)
Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.