green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bank of America Corp. v. Lemgruber
See Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, 943 F.2d 251, 254 (2d Cir.1991) (noting that § 1367(a) codified the availability of pendant jurisdiction), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Bodner v. Banque Paribas
See Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, Inc., 943 F.2d 251, 254 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Henrietta D. v. Giuliani
See Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, Inc., 943 F.2d 251, 254 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992). 10 .Plaintiffs had asked this Court to enjoin City defendants from altering or reducing the present structure and functions of DAS without showing how any alteration would better enable defendants to comply with their obligations to provide plaintiffs with meaningful and equal access to programs, benefits, and services.
cited
Cited "see"
McNight v. Dormitory Authority of State of NY
See Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, Inc., 943 F.2d 251, 257-58 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Bellovin v. United States
See Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, Inc., 943 F.2d 251, 254 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Hall v. Daka International, Inc.
See Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, 943 F.2d 251, 259 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Glinka v. Abraham and Rose Company Ltd.
See Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, Inc., 943 F.2d 251 (2d Cir.1991) (state age discrimination claim derives from same nucleus of operative fact as federal age discrimination claim), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992); White v. County of Newberry, South Carolina, 985 F.2d 168 (4th Cir.1993) (state law claim of inverse condemnation and federal CERCLA claim both alleged hazardous waste contamination caused by the County); LaSorella v. Penrose St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Abdu-Brisson v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
See id. (“Tf a state would not recognize a plaintiff’s right to bring a state claim in state court, a federal court exercising pendent jurisdiction, standing in the shoes of a state court, must follow a state’s jurisdictional determination and not allow that claim to be *111 appended to a federal law claim in federal court.’ ” (quoting Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, Inc., 943 F.2d 251, 257 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992))).
cited
Cited "see"
Stratton v. DEPARTMENT FOR AGING CITY OF NEW YORK
See Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, Inc., 943 F.2d 251, 258 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Spear v. Sowders
See Daugherty v. Campbell, 935 F.2d 780, 787 (6th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992)(affirm-ing denial of summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spear v. Sowders
See Daugherty v. Campbell, 935 F.2d 780, 787 (6th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992)(affirming denial of summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds). 38 It must be recognized, however, that citizens do not lose all the protection of the Fourth Amendment when they visit prison.
cited
Cited "see"
Harris v. Rivera
See Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, 943 F.2d 251 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Falik v. Parker Duryee Rosoff & Haft
See Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, Inc., 943 F.2d 251, 254 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kenneth Daugherty, as Personal Representative of Lenora Daugherty, Deceased v. Donal Campbell
(2×)
See Daugherty v. Campbell, 935 F.2d 780 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Chambers v. Capital Cities/ABC
See Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, 943 F.2d 251 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Crawford v. TRW, INC.
See Barbe v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc., 722 F.Supp. 1257, 1260 (D.Md.1989), aff 'd, 940 F.2d 651 (4th Cir.1991), cert. denied — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 109 (1992), in which the court explained the preemption analysis mandated by Allis-Chalmers and Lingle : Under a proper preemption analysis ... the first step is to recognize the essential elements of the state law tort claims, in this case defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress, and against the elements so identified, determine whether the state law claim can be resolved without interpreting or d…
discussed
Cited "see"
Betz v. Legal Aid Society
See Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, 943 F.2d 251, 257 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992); Keeley v. Citibank, N.A., 711 F.Supp. 157, 161 (S.D.N.Y.1989); Giuffre v. Metropolitan Life Insur.
discussed
Cited "see"
Postema v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs
Accord Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, Inc., 943 F.2d 251, 257 (2d Cir.1991) (under New York law, EEOC’s automatic referral of a discrimination complaint to the SDHR “is deemed to exercise plaintiff’s option for an administrative forum,” and bars plaintiff from pursuing the claim in a judicial forum), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992); Cholewa v. New York News Inc., No. 89 Civ. 4929, 1991 WL 198731 , 1991 U.S.Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
Godfrey v. Perkin-Elmer Corp.
See Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, Inc., 943 F.2d 251, 254 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992); Sinclair v. Soniform, Inc., 935 F.2d 599, 603 (3d Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arawana Mills Co. v. United Technologies Corp.
See Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, Inc., 943 F.2d 251, 254 (2d Cir.1991) (“A federal court’s exercise of pendent jurisdiction over plaintiff’s state law claims, while not automatic, is a favored and normal course of action.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Greenfield v. Schmidt Baking Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Barbe v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc., 722 F.Supp. 1257 (D.Md.1989) (finding that resolution of employer’s privilege defense would require interpretation of the CBA to determine the relative interests in the communication of the union, the employer and the employee where the communication was published only to the employee, two supervisors and the local union), af f'd mem., 940 F.2d 651 (4th Cir.1991), ce rt. denied, 502 U.S. 1059 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 109 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Deshais v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
See, e.g., Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, 943 F.2d 251, 259 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tanzini v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.
See, e.g., Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, 943 F.2d 251, 259 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kenneth R. THORNLEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PENTON PUBLISHING, INC., Defendant-Appellant
See, e.g., Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, Inc., 943 F.2d 251 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060 , 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992) (noting eases ruling that social security benefits should not be set off from ADEA lost wages award, although not reaching the issue); Maxfield v. Sinclair Int’l, 766 F.2d 788, 793-94 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1057 , 106 S.Ct. 796 , 88 L.Ed.2d 773 (1986) (refusing to offset social security benefits); Guthrie v. J.C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Williamson v. City of Virginia Beach, Va.
Employees Ass’n v. Seiter, 858 F.2d 1171, 1177 (6th Cir.1988); see also Daugherty v. Campbell, 935 F.2d 780 (6th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 112 S.Ct. 939 , 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McCoy
v.
Hearst Corp.
v.
Hearst Corp.
No. 91-889.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 1992.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.