green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Stone v. UNITED ENGIN., a DIV. OF WEAN
See Brown v. Clark Equipment Co., 62 Haw. 530 , 618 P.2d 267, 276 (1980) ("[S]afety data, codes or standards... promulgated by voluntary industry organizations... are admissible as evidence on the issue of negligence ... [and are] admissible as an alternative to or utilized to buttress *455 expert testimony.") Clearly then, evidence of safety standards "`may be relevant and admissible even though the standards have not been imposed by statute or promulgated by a regulatory body and therefore do not have the force of law.'" Ross v. Black & Decker, Inc., 977 F.2d 1178, 1184 (7th Cir. 1992) ( quo…
discussed
Cited "see"
Stone v. United Engineering, A Division of Wean, Inc.
See Brown v. Clark Equipment Co., 62 Haw. 530 , 618 P.2d 267, 276 (1980) (“[S]afety data, codes or standards ... promulgated by voluntary industry organizations ... are admissible as evidence on the issue of negligence ... [and are] admissible as an alternative to or utilized to buttress expert testimony.”) Clearly then, evidence of safety standards “ ‘may be relevant and admissible even though the standards have not been imposed by statute or promulgated by a regulatory body and therefore do not have the force of law.’ ” Ross v. Black & Decker, Inc., 977 F.2d 1178, 1184 (7th Cir.1…
discussed
Cited "see"
Joiner v. Ryder System Inc.
See Ross v. Black & Decker, Inc., 977 F.2d 1178, 1189 (7th Cir.1992) (Under Illinois law, one of the relevant factors in determining the amount of punitive damages is “the financial status of the defendant."), cer t. denied, 507 U.S. 917 , 113 S.Ct. 1274 , 122 L.Ed.2d 669 (1993). 21 .
discussed
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,796 Julie Klonowski, Now Arndt, and Threshermen's Mutual Insurance Company v. International Armament Corporation
See Mercado v. Ahmed, 974 F.2d 863, 866 (7th Cir.1992). 3 “The appellant carries a heavy burden in challenging a trial court’s evidentiary rulings on appeal because a reviewing court gives special deference to the evidentiary rulings of the trial court.” Ross v. Black & Decker, Inc., 977 F.2d 1178, 1183 (7th Cir.1992) (citing Wheeler v. Sims, 951 F.2d 796, 801-02 (7th Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 320 , 121 L.Ed.2d 241 (1992)), cert. denied — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1274 , 122 L.Ed.2d 669 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cabrera v. International Restaurant Services, Inc.
While the law is by no means settled, ANSI codes have an “inherent trustworthiness” and often their introduction is necessary to “impart relevant information not contained elsewhere.” Id; see also Brown v. Clark Equipment Co., 618 P.2d 267, 276 (1980) (“[S]afety data, codes or standards ... 18 promulgated by voluntary industry organizations ... are admissible as evidence on the issue of negligence ... [and are] admissible as an alternative to or utilized to buttress expert testimony.”) Clearly then, evidence of safety standards “‘may be relevant and admissible even though the s…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Popejoy v. New Mexico Board of Bar Commissioners
See also Weaver v. University of Cincinnati, 970 F.2d 1523, 1535 (6th Cir.1992) (citing Lowary), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1274 , 122 L.Ed.2d 668 (1993); Bromley v. Michigan Educ.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pulla v. Amoco Oil Co.
Compare Ross v. Black & Decker, Inc., 977 F.2d 1178, 1181 (7th Cir.1992) ("In diversity cases, state law governs the standard of review of a denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict."), cer t. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1274 , 122 L.Ed.2d 669 (1993) with Rotonda v. Keene Corp., 956 F.2d 436, 438 (3rd Cir.1992) (applying federal law standard).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
40 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 965, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,079 Randy C. McKnight a Minor, by and Through His Next Friend, Dessie Ludwig v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
Compare Ross v. Black & Decker, Inc., 977 F.2d 1178, 1181 (7th Cir.1992) ("In diversity cases, state law governs the standard of review of a denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.") cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1274 , 122 L.Ed.2d 669 (1993) with Rotondo v. Keene Corp., 956 F.2d 436, 438 (3d Cir.1992) (applying federal law standard).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McKnight ex rel. Ludwig v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
Compare Ross v. Black & Decker, Inc., 977 F.2d 1178, 1181 (7th Cir.1992) (“In diversity cases, state law governs the standard of review of a denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.”) cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1274 , 122 L.Ed.2d 669 (1993) with Rotondo v. Keene Corp., 956 F.2d 436, 438 (3d Cir.1992) (applying federal law standard).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chadima v. National Fidelity Life Insurance
Compare Ross v. Black & Decker, Inc., 977 F.2d 1178, 1181 (7th Cir.1992) ("In diversity cases, state law governs the standard of review of a denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.”), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1274 , 122 L.Ed.2d 669 (1993) with Rotondo v. Keene Corp., 956 F.2d 436, 438 (3rd Cir.1992) (applying federal law standard).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brian Keenan, an Individual Resident of the State of Minnesota v. Computer Associates International, Inc., a Foreign Corporation
Compare Ross v. Black & Becker, Inc., 977 F.2d 1178, 1181 (7th Cir.1992) (“In diversity cases, state law governs the standard of review of a denial of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.’’) cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1274 , 122 L.Ed.2d 669 (1993) with Rotonda v. Keene Corp., 956 F.2d 436, 438 (3rd Cir.1992) (applying federal law standard).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Black & Decker, Inc.
v.
Ross
v.
Ross
No. 92-1082.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1993.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.