green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.4 score
“18 u.s.c. 3147 is not vague or ambiguous.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Jerome Lewis
18 u.s.c. 3147 is not vague or ambiguous.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lee
“Ongoing and continuous activity makes the passage of time less critical.” Snow, 919 F.2d at 1460 ; see United States v. Pace, 981 F.2d 1123, 1133 (10th Cir.1992) (when the affidavit contains information of an ongoing criminal activity, the passage of time is not as significant), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 966 , 113 S.Ct. 1401 , 122 L.Ed.2d 774 (1993); Sturmoski, 971 F.2d at 457 (“The offense in question was ongoing and continuing.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Utah-Zona Beck
See United States v. Morales, 977 F.2d 1330, 1330-31 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 966 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sayetsitty
See id. (we review de novo what conduct constitutes an obstruction of justice).
cited
Cited "see"
46 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 760, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1477, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2213 United States of America v. Larry Sayetsitty, United States of America v. Joe Sayetsitty
See id. (we review de novo what conduct constitutes an obstruction of justice).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tommy Blake McCary
See United States v. Galliano, 977 F.2d 1350, 1351 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1399 , 122 L.Ed.2d 772 (1993); United States v. Lincoln, 956 F.2d 1465 , 1473-74 and n. 8 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 269 , 121 L.Ed.2d 190 (1992) (Because an enhancement for an offense committed on release “shall be consecutive to any other sentence of imprisonment,” 18 U.S.C. § 3147 (1988), a defendant may not be permitted to serve the term of such an enhancement concurrently to any other term of imprisonment.).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Helene Donna Alpert, United States of America v. Carl Henry Alpert
(2×)
See United States v. Morales, 977 F.2d 1330, 1331 (9th Cir.1992) (per curiam) (contempt for refusal to testify at coconspirator's trial after grant of immunity), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1399 , 122 L.Ed.2d 772 (1993); United States v. Brum, 948 F.2d 817, 819-20 (1st Cir.1991) (perjury at trial); United States v. Matos, 907 F.2d 274, 276 (2d Cir.1990) (untruthful testimony at suppression hearing) 5 Draper is analogous to the Alperts' factual situation because the defendant-appellant failed to report to his assigned community corrections center, where he was awaiting sentencing aft…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Robert P. Aguilar, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
(2×)
See United States v. Galliano, 977 F.2d 1350, 1352 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1399 , 122 L.Ed.2d 772 (1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tillman v. Cook
See also United States v. Pace, 981 F.2d 1123, 1130 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 966 , 113 S.Ct. 1401 , 122 L.Ed.2d 774 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kalika v. Stern
See, e.g., Mareno v. Jet Aviation of Am., Inc., 970 F.2d 1126, 1128 (2d Cir.1992) (“Rule 11 has no retrospective application to a complaint filed in state court even if the action subsequently is removed to federal court”), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 966 , 113 S.Ct. 1401 , 122 L.Ed.2d 774 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McFarland v. Union Central Life Insurance
See, e.g., Fugarino v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, 969 F.2d 178 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 966 , 113 S.Ct. 1401 , 122 L.Ed.2d 774 (1993); International Resources, Inc. v. New York Life Insurance Company, supra. Having decided that ERISA governs the group insurance policy in issue, and therefore governs the issues in this civil action, the court must proceed to consider the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,971 United States of America v. Vernon Robert Lindholm, Jr.
See U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1, comment, (n. 7); see also United States v. Galliano, 977 F.2d 1350 , 1352-53 *1086 (9th Cir.1992) cert. denied, - U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 1399 , 122 L.Ed.2d 772 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jenkins
See also United States v. Jessup, 966 F.2d 1354 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1398 , 122 L.Ed.2d 772 (1993) (defendant properly denied two-point reduction for acceptance of responsibility based on information obtained by the government in violation of state law on medical privilege).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jenkins
See also United States v. Jessup, 966 F.2d 1354 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1398 , 122 L.Ed.2d 772 (1993) (defendant properly denied two-point reduction for acceptance of responsibility based on information obtained by the government in violation of state law on medical privilege).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lazaro Roman
The exclusionary rule might, however, "apply in sentencing proceedings [where the] evidence [was] unconstitutionally seized solely to enhance the defendant's sentence." Id. at 1237 n. 15; see also United States v. Jessup, 966 F.2d 1354 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1398 , 122 L.Ed.2d 772 (1993); cf. United States v. Gilmer, 811 F.Supp. 578 (D.Colo.1993) (egregious circumstances prohibited use of evidence at sentencing). 27 Lynch provides an illustration of a constitutional challenge to a prior conviction that would be irrelevant for sentencing purposes.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Galliano
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-7398.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 1993.
Cited by 29 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.