discussed Cited "see" UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard BONAT, Defendant-Appellant See United States v. Alvarez, 972 F.2d 1000, 1005 (9th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 977 , 113 S.Ct. 1427 , 122 L.Ed.2d 795 (1993) (citing both Sweeten and O’Neal for the proposition that documents other than the charging paper and the jury instructions may be used to show that Taylor's narrow exception has been met). 5 .

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Felix Garcia See United States v. Alvarez, 972 F.2d 1000, 1003-04 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 977 , 113 S.Ct. 1427 , 122 L.Ed.2d 795 (1993); United States v. Young, 730 F.2d 221, 224 (5th Cir.1984); United States v. McRary, 665 F.2d 674, 678 (5th Cir. Unit B) (“The word ‘commerce’ is consistently preceded in the statute by ‘interstate or foreign’ without any hint that ‘commerce’ should have separate meanings for each.”) (footnote omitted), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1011 , 102 S.Ct. 2306 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1982); cf. United States v. Carter, 981 F.2d 645, 648 (2d Cir.1992) (defendant…

cited Cited "see" United States v. Michael J. Connell See United States v. Alvarez, 972 F.2d 1000, 1004 (9th Cir.1992) ("A variance requires reversal only when the defendant was prejudiced thereby."), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 977 (1993).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Dixon See also State v. Moss, 172 Wis.2d 110 , 492 N.W.2d 627 (1992) (holding that use of a ruse to effect entry in the execution of a search warrant does not violate the fourth amendment, following Myers’ analysis), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 977 , 113 S.Ct. 1428 , 122 L.Ed.2d 796 (1993); Iverson, 272 N.W.2d at 5 (holding that use of ruse to effect entry not constitutionally unreasonable where officers had valid search warrant, no force was threatened or used, and no “breaking” occurred because invasion of privacy was minimal); Leahy, 272 F.2d at 490 (“[t]here is no constitutional mandate forbi…