green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Warren v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.
See Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, 981 F.2d 107 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1005 , 113 S.Ct. 1645 , 123 L.Ed.2d 267 (1993) (swimming pool liner with no depth markers); Dougherty v. Edward J.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Richard L. Turner Genevieve M. Turner, Debtors. Richard L. Turner v. Linda A. Schuette
See Officers for Justice v. Civil Service Comm'n, 979 F.2d 721 , 726 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1645 (1993) (failure to raise argument in opening brief constitutes waiver)
cited
Cited "see"
Bernstein v. Donaldson (In Re Insulfoams, Inc.)
See Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc., 981 F.2d 107, 121-22 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 1645 , 123 L.Ed.2d 267 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Silicone Gel Breast Implants Products Liability Litigation
See Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc., 981 F.2d 107 (3d Cir.1992) (duty to warn exists only when component has a specific purpose and use), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1645 , 123 L.Ed.2d 267 (1993); and Kalinowski v. E.I.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re TMJ Implants Products Liability Litigation
See Fleck v. EDI Sylvan Pools, Inc., 981 F.2d 107 (3d Cir.1992) (duty to warn exists only when component has a single use), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1645 , 123 L.Ed.2d 267 (1993); Kalinowski v. E.I.
discussed
Cited "see"
Becker v. Baron Bros.
See Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc., 981 F.2d 107, 113 (3d Cir.1992) (stating that in reaching decision under state law, “Absent clear guidance from the [state] Supreme Court, [a federal court] must predict how it would decide the issues * * *”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1645 , 123 L.Ed.2d 267 (1993); see also West v. American Tel. & Tel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Metzgar v. Playskool, Inc.
See Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc., 981 F.2d 107, 119 (3d Cir.1992) ("The inquiry is whether the product is defective for ordinary use and foreseeable misuse”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1645 , 123 L.Ed.2d 267 (1993); Sheldon v. West Bend Equip.
discussed
Cited "see"
Metzgar v. Playskool Inc.
See Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc., 981 F.2d 107, 119 (3d Cir.1992) ("The inquiry is whether the product is defective for ordinary use and foreseeable misuse"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1645 , 123 L.Ed.2d 267 (1993); Sheldon v. West Bend Equip.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rose v. Fox Pool Corp.
Black’s Law Dictionary (6th ed. 1990), at 757; see Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc., 981 F.2d 107, 114 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 1645 , 123 L.Ed.2d 267 (1993); McCormick v. Columbus Conveyer Co., 564 A.2d at 909 .
discussed
Cited "see"
John J. Marick v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
See Officers for Justice v. Civil Service Comm., 979 F.2d 721 , 726 (9th Cir.1992) (court does not ordinarily consider matters not raised and argued in opening brief), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1645 (1993); Dohmen-Ramirez, 837 F.2d at 859 (arguments not presented to CFTC are disregarded on appeal). 12 AFFIRMED. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3
cited
Cited "see"
Rubin Quinn Moss Heaney & Patterson, P.C. v. Kennel
See Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, 981 F.2d 107 , 117 (3d Cir.1992) (applying Pennsylvania law), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1645 , 123 L.Ed.2d 267 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grace v. Rosenstock
Id. at 929-31; see also Howing Co. v. Nationwide Corp., 972 F.2d 700, 708-09 (6th Cir. 1992) (holding that the loss of a state law remedy creates a federal action under § 13(e) of the Securities Exchange Act), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1004 , 113 S.Ct. 1645 , 123 L.Ed.2d 266 (1993); Thouret v. Hudner, No. 95 Civ. 1793(JSM), 1996 WL 38824 , at *2-3 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andritz Sprout-Bauer, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc.
See, e.g., Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc., 981 F.2d 107, 122 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1005 , 113 S.Ct. 1645 , 123 L.Ed.2d 267 (1993); Girard v. Allis Chalmers Corp., 787 F.Supp. 482, 489 (W.D.Pa.1992); and McClure v. Deerland Corp., 401 Pa.Super. 226 , 585 A.2d 19, 22 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Koppers Company, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company Zurich Insurance Company the Travelers Indemnity Co. The American Home Assurance Company Commercial Union Insurance Company the Home Insurance Company Underwriter's at Lloyd's of London. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Certain Insurance Companies in the London Market, Referred to in This Action as \Jackson and Companies\"
See, e.g., Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc., 981 F.2d 107, 122 (3d Cir.1992) (applying Pennsylvania law and noting that before any right of indemnification arises, indemnitee must in fact pay damages to third party), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1005 , 113 S.Ct. 1645 , 123 L.Ed.2d 267 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Koppers Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
See, e.g., Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc., 981 F.2d 107, 122 (3d Cir.1992) (applying Pennsylvania law and noting that before any right of indemnification arises, indemnitee must in fact pay damages to third parly), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1005 , 113 S.Ct. 1645 , 123 L.Ed.2d 267 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hannon v. Chater
Johnson, supra, 480 U.S. at 626 , 107 S.Ct. at 1449 ; see also, Officers for Justice v. Civil Service Comm’n of City and County of San Francisco, 979 F.2d 721, 725 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1645 , 123 L.Ed.2d 267 (1993). 48 In Hannon’s ease, however, the Government denies that OHA’s Affirmative Action Plan was actually relied upon as a basis for choosing a lower-rated female candidate for position twelve in Los Angeles. 49 Moreover, the decision to bypass Hannon for the position twelve was beyond the scope of OHA’s Affirmative Action Plan.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Annamarie Lamontagne, Doreen A. Festa and Susan B. Pregler v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company, Inc.
See also Fleck v. KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc., 981 F.2d 107, 118 (3d Cir.1992) (noting Pennsylvania-law distinction between supplier whose product has but one use and supplier whose product has numerous productive uses), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 1645 , 123 L.Ed.2d 267 (1993); Restatement § 402A, comment p (seller of a component that is “capable of a wide variety of uses” is not as likely to be held liable for hazards inherent in final product as would be the seller of a single-use component); Kalinouiski v. E.I.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Arthur R. Miller and Janet E. Miller, Debtors. Equitable Bank v. Arthur R. Miller, and Janet E. Miller
See also In re Woolum, 979 F.2d 71, 73-74 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1645 , 123 L.Ed.2d 267 (1993); In re Liming, 797 F.2d 895 , 897 (10th Cir.1986); Carini v. Matera, 592 F.2d 378, 380-81 (7th Cir.1979); In re Houtman, 568 F.2d 651, 655-56 (9th Cir.1978). 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jerry WOOLUM
v.
BANK ONE, LEXINGTON, N.A.
v.
BANK ONE, LEXINGTON, N.A.
No. 92-1304.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 29, 1993.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Denied.