Casares v. United States, 507 U.S. 1023 (1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Casares v. United States, 507 U.S. 1023 (1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Chin (nyed, 1995-12-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Chin
E.D.N.Y · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United, States v. Carter, 981 F.2d 645 (2d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1023 , 113 S.Ct. 1827 , 123 L.Ed.2d 456 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Terry Lynn Stinson
11th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Carter, 981 F.2d 645 (2nd Cir.1992), cert. denied, Carter v. United States, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1827 , 123 L.Ed.2d 456 (1993); United States v. Fitzhugh, 954 F.2d 253 (5th Cir.1992), cert. denied, Fitzhugh v. United States, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 259 , 126 L.Ed.2d 211 (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Smith
1st Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Gillies, 851 F.2d 492, 494 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 857 , 109 S.Ct. 147 , 102 L.Ed.2d 119 (1988); see also United States v. Carter, 981 F.2d 645, 648 (2d Cir.1992) (instruction that “it is sufficient that the firearm allegedly possessed or received by defendant had at some point previously travelled across a state line” upheld in Section 922(g)(1) case), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 1023 , 113 S.Ct. 1827 , 123 L.Ed.2d 456 (1993). 12 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Luciano Sorrentino
2d Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
It further concluded that 18 U.S.C. § 1202 (a), the predecessor statute to Section 922(g), was a legitimate exercise of Congress’s powers under the Commerce Clause because the Constitution requires only a “minimal nexus that the firearm have been, at some time, in interstate commerce.” See id. at 575 , 97 S.Ct. at 1968 ; see also United States v. Carter, 981 F.2d 645, 647 (2d Cir.1992) (“In the context of firearm control, it is well established that for a firearm to fall within the Commerce Clause, it need only have travelled previously in interstate commerce.”), cert. denied, 507 U…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Taylor
D. Conn. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
In Scarborough v. United States, 431 U.S. 563 , 97 S.Ct. 1963 , 52 L.Ed.2d 582 (1977), the Court revisited this issue and held that the statute required only “the minimal nexus that the firearm have been, at some time, in interstate commerce.” Id. at 575 , 97 S.Ct. at 1969 ; see also United States v. Carter, 981 F.2d 645, 647 (2d Cir.1992) (“In the context of firearm control, it is well established that for a firearm to fall within the Commerce Clause, it need only have travelled previously in interstate commerce”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1827 , 123 L.Ed.2d 456 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Casares
v.
United States
No. 92-7832.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 5, 1993.
507 U.S. 1023
Published

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.