green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Darius Herrera-Ordones
See United States v. Beal, 960 *513 F.2d 629, 631 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 880 , 113 S.Ct. 230 , 121 L.Ed.2d 166 (1992); United States v. Fonner, 920 F.2d 1330, 1335 (7th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven Holt
See United States v. Beal, 960 F.2d 629, 636 (7th Cir.) (holding that district court did not clearly err in considering inmate’s justification for carrying contraband as conduct inconsistent with an affirmative acceptance of responsibility), ce rt. denied, 506 U.S. 880 , 113 S.Ct. 230 , 121 L.Ed.2d 166 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph B. Carson, John K. Lanter, Wilbert Hall, Aaron Hall, and Ronald L. Flaugher
See United States v. Beal, 960 F.2d 629, 635 (7th Cir.) (sentence affirmed even though district court did not specifically state reasons for finding defendant had not accepted responsibility for his crime under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 because court’s denial was sufficiently specific to allow for meaningful review and because there was an adequate basis in the record for such a finding), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 230 , 121 L.Ed.2d 166 (1992); United States v. Blas, 947 F.2d 1320, 1330 (7th Cir.1991) (same), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 112 S.Ct. 1234 , 117 L.Ed.2d 468 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth E. Ford
See United States v. Beal, 960 F.2d 629 , 634 n. 3 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 230 , 121 L.Ed.2d 166 (1992); United States v. White, 875 F.2d 427, 431-32 (4th Cir.1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joel L. Kelley
See United States v. Beal, 960 F.2d 629, 634 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 230 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald Sauerwein
Instead, a finding of fact is clearly erroneous only when “the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” Id. at 573 , 105 S.Ct. at 1511 (citations omitted); see also United States v. Beal, 960 F.2d 629, 632 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 230 , 121 L.Ed.2d 166 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John L. Cheek
Congress has mandated that the clearly erroneous standard of review be applied to findings of fact in the sentencing context. 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (e); see also United States v. Beal, 960 F.2d 629, 632 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 230 , 121 L.Ed.2d 166 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sines
v.
Sines
v.
Sines
No. 92-5122.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
Published
Cir. Ct. Lewis County, W. Va. Certiorari denied.