green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Cheryl D. Christopher v. Adam's Mark Hotels, a Division of Hbe Corporation
(2×)
See Hase v. Missouri Div. of Employment Sec., 972 F.2d 893, 895 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 906 , 113 S.Ct. 2332 , 124 L.Ed.2d 244 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Aurelio Pina, United States of America v. David Luna
See United States v. Felix-Gutierrez, 940 F.2d 1200, 1207 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 2332 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Estate of Braude v. United States
Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 580B and 766B (1977); see Su v. M/V Southern Aster, 978 F.2d 462, 474-75 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 906 , 113 S.Ct. 2331 , 124 L.Ed.2d 244 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
M. Margaret ADAMS, Appellant, v. WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY, Appellee
(2×)
See Hase v. Missouri Div. of Employment Sec., 972 F.2d 893, 895-96 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2332 , 124 L.Ed.2d 244 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rosa Olivera Rivera, United States of America v. Alfonso Rivera-Farias, United States of America v. Maria Diaz, United States of America v. Francisca Lara, United States of America v. Rosendo Cisneros
(2×)
See United States v. Felix-Gutierrez, 940 F.2d 1200, 1208 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 2332 , 124 L.Ed.2d 244 (1993).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Ruben Taren-Palma, United States of America v. Ismael Calderon-Perez
(4×)
See United States v. Felix-Gutierrez, 940 F.2d 1200, 1210 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2332 , 124 L.Ed.2d 244 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McKee
(2×)
See United States v. Jungles, 903 F.2d 468, 473-74 (7th Cir.1990) (activity that is itself lawful can constitute an affirmative act to evade); see also United States v. Pollen, 978 F.2d 78, 86 (3d Cir.1992) (transporting funds to foreign countries, thereby making it more difficult to trace, provides inference of intent to evade), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 906 , 113 S.Ct. 2332 , 124 L.Ed.2d 244 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Voigt
SeeUnited States v. Jungles, 903 F.2d 468, 473-74 (7th Cir. 1990) (activity that is lawful itself can constitute affirmative act to evade); see also United States v. Pollen, 978 F.2d 78, 86 (3d Cir. 1992) (transporting funds to foreign countries, thereby making it more difficult to trace, provides inference of intent to evade), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 906 , 113 S. Ct. 2332 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Voigt
(2×)
See United States v. Jungles, 903 F.2d 468, 473-74 (7th Cir.1990) (activity that is lawful itself can constitute affirmative act to evade); see also United States v. Pollen, 978 F.2d 78, 86 (3d Cir.1992) (transporting funds to foreign countries, thereby making it more difficult to trace, provides inference of intent to evade), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 906 , 113 S.Ct. 2332 , 124 L.Ed.2d 244 (1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Derrick R. Cooper
See also, United States v. Pollen, 978 F.2d 78, 85-87 (3rd Cir.1992), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 2332 (1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cooper
See also, United States v. Pollen, 978 F.2d 78, 85-87 (3rd Cir. 1992), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S. Ct. 2332 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9376, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16,355 United States of America v. Anthony C. Sarno and Charles W. Knapp, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Joseph v. Nash
(2×)
We likewise evaluate the district court's determination of the factual basis for a requested instruction under an abuse of discretion standard. 8 37 We agree with the district court that the requested instructions were either unduly argumentative or unnecessary because they were adequately subsumed by the instructions given to the jury. "[A] court is not required to accept a proposed instruction which is manifestly intended to influence the jury towards accepting the evidence of the defendant as against that of the prosecution." United States v. Hall, 552 F.2d 273, 275 (9th Cir.1977); see also…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sarno
(2×)
We likewise evaluate the district court’s determination of the factual basis for a requested instruction under an abuse of discretion standard. 8 We agree with, the district court that the requested instructions were either unduly argumentative or unnecessary because they were adequately subsumed by the instructions given to the jury. “[A] court is not required to accept a proposed instruction which is manifestly intended to influence the jury towards accepting the evidence of the defendant as against that of the prosecution.” United States v. Hall, 552 F.2d 273, 275 (9th Cir.1977); see …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ross James Preston
(2×)
See also, United States v. Pollen, 978 F.2d 78, 92 (3d Cir., 1992) (“[T]he fact that a defendant is also convicted of Guidelines offenses does not affect a sentencing court’s discretion in sentencing on the pre-Guidelines counts.”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 2332 , 124 L.Ed.2d 244 (1993); United States v. Cutchin, 956 F.2d 1216, 1219 (D.C.Cir.1992) (“Because the Guidelines are silent on the issue, how a court is to relate a Guidelines sentence to a non-Guidelines sentence is a matter of discretion.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stephen A. Knox
(2×)
The rule of lenity " 'comes into operation at the end of the process of construing what Congress has expressed, not at the beginning as an overriding consideration of being lenient to wrong-doers.'" Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 29 , 104 S.Ct. 296, 303 , 78 L.Ed.2d 17 (1983) (quoting Callanan v. United States, 364 U.S. 587, 596 , 81 S.Ct. 321, 326 , 5 L.Ed.2d 312 (1961)); see also United States v. Pollen, 978 F.2d 78, 85 (3d Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2332 , 124 L.Ed.2d 244 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Knox
The rule of lenity "'comes into operation at the end of the process of construing what Congress has expressed, not at the beginning as an overriding consideration of being lenient to wrong-doers.'" Russello v. United States, 464 U.S. 16, 29 , 104 S. Ct. 296, 303 (1983) (quoting Callanan v. United States, 364 U.S. 587, 596 , 81 S. Ct. 321, 326 (1961)); see also United States v. Pollen, 978 F.2d 78, 85 (3d Cir. 1992), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 113 S. Ct. 2332 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bertoli
(2×)
See Seligsohn, 981 F.2d at 1424 ; United States v. Kopp, 951 F.2d 521, 526 (3d Cir.1991), reh’g denied en banc, 1992 U.S.App.LEXIS 2334 (3d Cir. Feb. 18, 1992); Cianscewski, 894 F.2d at 77 n. 6; see also United States v. Pollen, 978 F.2d 78, 90 , reh’g denied en banc, 1992 U.S.App.LEXIS 29,864 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2332 , 124 L.Ed.2d 244 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
v.
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
v.
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
No. 92-1336.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1993.
Cited by 53 opinions | Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.