green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
examined
Cited "but see"
In the Matter of Elray and Jean Rash, Debtor. Associates Commercial Corporation v. Elray Rash and Jean E. Rash
(6×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
But see General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Mitchell (In re Mitchell), 954 F.2d 557, 560 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 303 , 121 L.Ed.2d 226 (1992).
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re Dews
See In re Rash, 31 F.3d 326 (5th Cir.1994) (replacement cost based on the retail value of the collateral is the proper standard) reh’g denied 62 F.3d 685 (5th Cir. 1995) and reh’g en banc granted 68 F.3d 113 (5th Cir.1995); In re Trimble, 50 F.3d 530 (8th Cir.1995) (amount of secured claim should be lesser of principal balance of debt or retail value); But See In re Mitchell, 954 F.2d 557 (9th Cir.1992) cert. denied 506 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 303 , 121 L.Ed.2d 226 (1992) (wholesale value is appropriate standard).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Badr
See San Filippo v. Bongiovanni, 961 F. 2d 1125, 1139 (3d Cir.) (evaluating a vagueness challenge to a standard for discharge from public employment), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 305 , 121 L.Ed. 2d 228 (1992); Chez Sez VIII, Inc. v. Poritz, 297 N.J.Super. 331, 351 , 688 A. 2d 119 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 149 N.J. 409 , 694 A. 2d 194 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 932 , 118 S.Ct. 337 , 139 L.Ed. 2d 262 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. DOC
See San Filippo v. Bongiovanni, 961 F. 2d 1125, 1139 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 305 , 121 L.Ed. 2d 228 (1992) (evaluating a vagueness challenge to a standard for discharge from public employment).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Guhl
See San Filippo v. Bongiovanni, 743 F.Supp. 327 , 332 n. 3 (D.N.J.1990) (striking inadmissible elements of affidavit but permitting remainder), rev’d on other grounds, 961 F.2d 1125 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 506 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 305 , 121 L.Ed.2d 228 (1992); see also Lombardi v. Cosgrove, 7 F.Supp.2d 481, 492 (D.N.J.1997) (denying motion to strike but ignoring conclusions, beliefs, and misstatements, and using the assertions based on personal knowledge). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
D.H.L. Associates, Inc. v. O'Gorman
See Woodall v. El Paso, 959 F.2d 1305, 1306 (5th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 304 , 121 L.Ed.2d 227 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Coover v. Saucon Valley School District
See San Filippo v. Bongiovanni, 961 F.2d 1125, 1135 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 305 , 121 L.Ed.2d 228 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
ca9 1996
See City of Vernon v. Southern California Edison Co., 955 F.2d 1361, 1371 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 305 , 121 L.Ed.2d 228 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
McClaran v. Plastic Industries, Inc.
See City of Vernon v. Southern California Edison Co., 955 F.2d 1361, 1371 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 305 , 121 L.Ed.2d 228 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. Univ. of Pittsburgh
See In re Public Service Company of New Hampshire, 963 F.2d 469, 471-76 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 908 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. Univ. of Pittsburgh
See In re Public ___ ____________ Service Company of New Hampshire, 963 F.2d 469, 471-76 (1st _________________________________ Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 908 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Mitchell
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See In re Mitchell, 954 F.2d 557 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 303 , 121 L.Ed.2d 226 (1992) (wholesale value should apply as a general rule in valuing vehicles; wholesale blue book figure used to value GMAC’s allowed secured claim); In re Klein, 10 B.R. 657 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1981) (court valued vehicle at amount which could be realized by GMAC on a bid market); In re Adams, 2 B.R. 313 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1980) (value of security interest in vehicle was wholesale where creditor was a credit union and not an automobile dealer); see also In re Owens, 120 B.R. 487 (Bankr.E.D.Ark…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hernandez v. United States
See Canadian Transport Co. v. United States, 663 F.2d 1081, 1092 (D.C.Cir.1980); see also Industria Panificadora, S.A. v. United States, 957 F.2d 886, 887 (D.C.Cir.1992) (per curiam), cert. denied 506 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 304 , 121 L.Ed.2d 227 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilson v. State Bar of Georgia
“Whether a statute, regulation, or local ordinance is unconstitutionally vague is a question of law that we review de novo.” Dodger’s Bar & Grill, Inc. v. Johnson County Bd. of County Comm’rs, 32 F.3d 1436 , 1443 (10th Cir.1994); see also San Filippo v. Bongiovanni, 961 F.2d 1125, 1133 (3d Cir.) (“The district court’s application of the void for vagueness doctrine ... is purely an issue of law subject to our plenary review.”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 305 , 121 L.Ed.2d 228 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilson v. State Bar of Georgia
“Whether a statute, regulation, or local ordinance is unconstitutionally vague is a question of law that we review de novo.” Dodger’s Bar & Grill, Inc. v. Johnson County Bd. of County Comm’rs, 32 F.3d 1436 , 1443 (10th Cir. 1994); see also San Filippo v. 9 Bongiovanni, 961 F.2d 1125, 1133 (3d Cir.) (“The district court's application of the void for vagueness doctrine . . . is purely an issue of law subject to our plenary review.”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 908 (1992).
GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
v.
George H. MITCHELL, et ux.
v.
George H. MITCHELL, et ux.
No. 92-9.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The motion of American Financial Services Association, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.