green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
D.H.L. Associates, Inc. v. O'Gorman
See Woodall v. El Paso, 959 F.2d 1305, 1306 (5th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 304 , 121 L.Ed.2d 227 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Public Service Company of New Hampshire, Debtor. Edward Kaufman v. Public Service Company of New Hampshire
See In re Public Service Company of New Hampshire, 963 F.2d 469 (1st Cir.1992), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 304 , 121 L.Ed.2d 226 (1992). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaufman v. PSC NH
See In re Public Service Company of ___ ________________________________ New Hampshire, 963 F.2d 469 (1st Cir. 1992), cert. denied, ______________ ____________ 113 S. Ct. 304 (1992). -3- -3- utility company selected as the winning bidder for Public Service through a competitive bidding process provided for in the plan.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaufman v. PSC NH
See In re Public Service Company of New Hampshire, 963 F.2d 469 (1st Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 304 (1992). -3- -3- utility company selected as the winning bidder for Public Service through a competitive bidding process provided for in the plan.
cited
Cited "see"
Northeast Utilities Service Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See In re Public Service Co. of New Hampshire, 963 F.2d 469, 470 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, Rochman v. Northeast Utilities Service Co., - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 304 , 121 L.Ed.2d 226 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vermont Department v. FERC
(2×)
See In re Public Service Co. of New Hampshire, 963 F.2d 469 , ___ _________________________________________ 470 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, Rochman v. Northeast Utilities _____ ______ _______ ___________________ Service Co., 113 S. Ct. 304 (1992). ___________ NU's proposal contained a two-step process: first, PSNH would emerge from bankruptcy as a stand-alone company bound to a merger agreement with NU; second, PSNH would be merged with an NU subsidiary created solely for the acquisition (NU Acquisition Corporation), with PSNH emerging as the surviving entity.
discussed
Cited "see"
Northeast Utilities Service Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Vermont Department of Public Service v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Towns of Concord, Norwood and Wellesley, Massachusetts v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Central Maine Power Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, City of Holyoke Gas & Electric Department v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Canal Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the American Paper Institute, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Boston Edison Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Vermont Department of Public Service v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See In re Public Service Co. of New Hampshire, 963 F.2d 469, 470 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, Rochman v. Northeast Utilities Service Co., --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 304 , 121 L.Ed.2d 226 (1992). 9 NU's proposal contained a two-step process: first, PSNH would emerge from bankruptcy as a stand-alone company bound to a merger agreement with NU; second, PSNH would be merged with an NU subsidiary created solely for the acquisition (NU Acquisition Corporation), with PSNH emerging as the surviving entity.
discussed
Cited "see"
Topanga Press, Inc. v. City Of Los Angeles
See Woodall v. City of El Paso, 959 F.2d 1305, 1306 (5th Cir.) (per curiam) modifying 950 F.2d 255 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 304 , 121 L.Ed.2d 227 (1992); Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, 928 F.2d 278, 283 (8th Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Topanga Press, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
See Woodall v. City of El Paso, 959 F.2d 1305, 1306 (5th Cir.) (per curiam) modifying 950 F.2d 255 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 304 , 121 L.Ed.2d 227 (1992); Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, 928 F.2d 278, 283 (8th Cir.1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Public Service Co. of New Hampshire v. Richards (In Re Public Service Co. of New Hampshire)
See In re Public Service Company of New Hampshire, 963 F.2d 469 (1st Cir.1992), cert. denied sub nom., Rochman v. N.E. *705 Utilities Service Co., — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 304 , 121 L.Ed.2d 226 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hernandez v. United States
See Canadian Transport Co. v. United States, 663 F.2d 1081, 1092 (D.C.Cir.1980); see also Industria Panificadora, S.A. v. United States, 957 F.2d 886, 887 (D.C.Cir.1992) (per curiam), cert. denied 506 U.S. 908 , 113 S.Ct. 304 , 121 L.Ed.2d 227 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
James E. Bennett, Sudbury, Inc., Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee v. Tinkham Veale, II
See also In Re Public Service Co., 963 F.2d 469, 471 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 304 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nell D. Autery, as Administratrix of the Estate of Roy Franklin Autery Charlotte Schreiner v. United States
See, e.g., Industria Panificadora v. United States, 957 F.2d 886, 887 (D.C.Cir.) (provision requiring government to “take all measures” to “restore, and ensure ... public order and safety” does not prescribe a specific course of action), cert. denied , — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 304 , 121 L.Ed.2d 227 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Martin ROCHMAN
v.
NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPANY
v.
NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPANY
No. 92-14.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Justice SOUTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.