green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Payne v. Collins
See Wheeler v. Sims, 951 F.2d 796 , 802 n. 5 (7th Cir.) ("A prison is clearly a 'business’ within the meaning of the term in Rule 803(6).” (internal quotations omitted)), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 914 , 113 S.Ct. 320 , 121 L.Ed.2d 241 (1992); Snyder, 787 F.2d at 1430-31, 1433-34 (investigative report of prisoner misconduct regarded as a business record). 48 .
discussed
Cited "see"
American Network Leasing, Inc. v. APEX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (In Re APEX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)
Second, the abuse of discretion standard itself includes an inquiry into the reliability of the bankruptcy court’s factual findings: “[A] judge abuses his discretion when his decision is based on an erroneous conclusion of law or *440 where the record contains no evidence on which he rationally could have based that decision, or where the supposed facts found are clearly erroneous_” Deitchman v. E.R Squibb & Sons, Inc., 740 F.2d 556, 563-64 (7th Cir.1984) (citation omitted) (emphasis supplied); see Wheeler v. Sims, 951 F.2d 796, 802 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 914 , 113 S.Ct. 320 …
discussed
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,796 Julie Klonowski, Now Arndt, and Threshermen's Mutual Insurance Company v. International Armament Corporation
See Mercado v. Ahmed, 974 F.2d 863, 866 (7th Cir.1992). 3 “The appellant carries a heavy burden in challenging a trial court’s evidentiary rulings on appeal because a reviewing court gives special deference to the evidentiary rulings of the trial court.” Ross v. Black & Decker, Inc., 977 F.2d 1178, 1183 (7th Cir.1992) (citing Wheeler v. Sims, 951 F.2d 796, 801-02 (7th Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 320 , 121 L.Ed.2d 241 (1992)), cert. denied — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1274 , 122 L.Ed.2d 669 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Edward C. Cella, Ii, and Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee
See, e.g., Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 951 F.2d 1128, 1130 (9th Cir.1991), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 320 , 121 L.Ed.2d 240 (1992) (citing Reed v. State, 283 Md. 374 , 391 A.2d 364, 367 (1978)); United States v. Williams, 583 F.2d 1194, 1197-1201 (2d Cir.1978) (applying de novo review to the question of general acceptance of a scientific technique).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Antoine
v.
Byers & Anderson, Inc.
v.
Byers & Anderson, Inc.
No. 91-7604.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1992.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted-. Certiorari granted.