green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Tenenbaum v. Williams
See United States v. Davis, 967 F.2d 84, 86 (2d Cir.) (“trial court is in a unique position to evaluate witnesses’ credibility.”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 928 , 113 S.Ct. 356 , 121 L.Ed.2d 270 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Tenenbaum v. Williams
See United States v. Davis, 967 F.2d 84, 86 (2d Cir.) ("trial court is in a unique position to evaluate witnesses' credibility."), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 928 , 113 S.Ct. 356 , 121 L.Ed.2d 270 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Earl Harris v. Folk Construction
See United States v. Johnson, 962 F.2d 1308 , 1312 (8th Cir.) (citing United States v. Demarrias, 876 F.2d 674, 677 (8th Cir. 1989) (Demarrias)), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 928 (1992); see also United States v. Foster, 57 F.3d 727, 732 (9th Cir. 1995) (agreeing with this court’s holding in Demarrias and noting that the magistrate judge judge “did nothing more than accept and file the verdict”).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Earl Harris, Husband Luvenia Harris, Wife, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Folk Construction Company, Appellees/cross-Appellants
See United States v. Johnson, 962 F.2d 1308, 1312 (8th Cir.) (citing United States v. Demarrias, 876 F.2d 674, 677 (8th Cir.1989) (Demarrias)), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 928 , 113 S.Ct. 358 , 121 L.Ed.2d 271 (1992); see also United States v. Foster, 57 F.3d 727, 732 (9th Cir.1995) (agreeing with this court’s holding in Demarrias and noting that the magistrate judge “did nothing more than accept and file the verdict”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Collado, Leopoldo Rivera-Rosa
(2×)
See United States v. Burrell, 963 F.2d 976, 992 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 928 , 113 S.Ct. 357 , 121 L.Ed.2d 270 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Shirley Thompson, Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Burrell, 963 F.2d 976, 987 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 928 , 113 S.Ct. 357 , 121 L.Ed.2d 270 (1992); see also United States v. Caudill, 915 F.2d 294, 297 (7th Cir.1990) (deferring to reasonable inferences drawn by the jury and the weight the jury gave the evidence).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Mario Chalarca, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
(2×)
In applying the Sentencing Guidelines, we have no alternative but to accept the district court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (e); see also United States v. Davis, 967 F.2d 84, 88-89 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 928 , 113 S.Ct. 356 , 121 L.Ed.2d 270 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Giraldo-Giraldo
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-5806.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1992.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.