green
Positive treatment
8.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 37 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rabindranauth
See State v. Smith, 222 Conn. 1, 18 , 608 A.2d 63 (“deceased’s violent character may not be established by evidence of specific violent acts, other than convictions”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S. Ct. 383 , 121 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Myers
Although the defendant acknowledges that an arrest record constitutes a race neutral ground for a peremptory strike; see State v. Smith, 222 Conn. 1, 14 , 608 A.2d 63 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S. Ct. 383 , 121 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Joaquin Villareal Castillo v. State of Texas
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 956 (Tex.Cr.App. 1992), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Joaquin Villareal Castillo v. State of Texas
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 956 (Tex.Cr.App. 1992), cert. denied , 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Joaquin Villareal Castillo v. State of Texas
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 956 (Tex.Cr.App. 1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Blue v. State
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 953 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992). .
cited
Cited "see"
Schenekl v. State
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 957 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Mabra v. State
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 956 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cer t. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Renteria v. State
See United States v. Cardona, 955 F.2d 976, 980 (5th Cir.1992), cert denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 291 (1992) (stating a stop where vehicle was between 40 and 50 miles from Mexican border was proper); United States v. Melendez-Gonzalez, 727 F.2d 407, 411 (5th Cir.1984) (stating a stop sixty miles from border was not sufficient to establish the vehicle came from border).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rubio-Hernandez
(2×)
See Cardona, 955 F.2d 976, 980 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 291 (1992) (stop was proper where vehicle was between 40 and 50 miles from Mexican border); United States v. Melendez-Gonzalez, 727 F.2d 407 -11 (5th Cir.1984) (a stop sixty miles from the Mexican border was not sufficient to establish that vehicle originated from the border).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Thomas
See State v. Smith, [ 222 Conn. 1, 6 , 608 A.2d 63 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S. Ct. 383 , 121 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Haney v. State
(2×)
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 956 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Griffith v. State
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 956-57 (Tex.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992); Chapman v. Evans, 744 S.W.2d 133 (Tex.Cr.App.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Broussard v. State
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 956-57 (Tex.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992); Chapman v. Evans, 744 S.W.2d 133 (Tex.Cr.App.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Floyd v. State
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 956 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Harris v. State
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 956-57 (Tex.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992); Chapman v. Evans, 744 S.W.2d 133, 135 (Tex.Cr.App.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Almanza v. State
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 963 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cantu v. State
(2×)
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 961-963 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992). [11] The extraneous offenses that were admitted included: * that appellant stole a bicycle from an eight-year-old and then turned it in for a reward; * that appellant threatened a woman and broke a window at her home; * that appellant attacked a sixth grade teacher; * that appellant threatened another student's father, saying that he wanted to kill him; * that appellant created problems in school by fighting and cursing; * that appellant threatened to kill an offic…
discussed
Cited "see"
Forte v. State
(2×)
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 960 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992); Rogers v. State, 774 S.W.2d 247, 260 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 984 , 110 S.Ct. 519 , 107 L.Ed.2d 520 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hill v. State
See Florida State Racing Commission v. Bourquardez, 42 So.2d 87, 88 (Fla.1949). [10] The majority has erroneously characterized Justice McDonald's dissenting opinion in Dougan v. State, 595 So.2d 1 (Fla.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 383 , 121 L.Ed.2d 293 (1992), as disagreeing with the Dougan majority decision upholding the finding of the CCP aggravator.
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 960 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Clarke v. State
(2×)
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 956 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. de nied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Foster v. State
See Dougan v. State, 595 So.2d 1 (Fla.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 383 , 121 L.Ed.2d 293 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Blessing v. State
See Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 963 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
See State v. Smith, 222 Conn. 1, 30 , 608 A.2d 63 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S. Ct. 383 , 121 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Patterson
See State v. Smith, [ 222 Conn. 1, 6 , 608 A.2d 63 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S. Ct. 383 , 121 L.
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RAFAEL SALAZAR, JR
See United States v. Cardona, 955 F.2d 976, 977 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Holloway
Ed. 2d 319 (1999); see also State v. Smith, 222 Conn. 1 , 14 n.8, 608 A.2d 63 (“[b]ecause we have concluded that the state’s concern about [the venireperson’s] arrest record was a neutral ground for excusing him from the jury, which was adequately supported by the record, we need not address [the] other claim”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S. Ct. 383 , 121 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Adjutant
See, e.g., State v. Smith, 222 Conn. 1, 17-18 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 (1992); State v. Deavers, 252 Kan. 149, 156-157 (1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 978 (1993); State v. Aguiar, 322 N.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Minor v. State
See Banda v. State, 890 S.W.2d 42, 62 (Tex.Crim.App.1994), cer t. denied, 515 U.S. 1105 , 115 S.Ct. 2253 , 132 L.Ed.2d 260 (1995) (holding that unadjudicated offenses may be introduced during capital sentencing); see also Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 962 (Tex.Crim.App.) (same), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992); Ramirez v. State, 815 S.W.2d 636, 653 (Tex.Crim.App.1991) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Morales
In addition, the prosecutor’s opinion that she found it difficult to believe R’s testimony that he had been totally unaffected by crime, even though he lived in a high-crime complex, was a legitimate reason for excusing R. “[T]he fact a prosecutor distrusts a juror or finds [the juror’s] responses not to be credible [may] be a sufficiently race-neutral reason for using a peremptory challenge.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hinton, supra, 227 Conn. 326 -27; see also State v. Smith, 222 Conn. 1, 14 , 608 A.2d 63 (“venireperson’s assessment of his own prejudices may b…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. O'Neil
Since 1881, when we first considered this type of charge in State v. Smith, 49 Conn. 376, 386 (1881), we consistently have upheld the Chip Smith charge as “an acceptable method of assisting the jury to achieve unanimity.” State v. Wooten, 227 Conn. 677, 707 , 631 A.2d 271 (1993); see, e.g., State v. Smith, 222 Conn. 1, 22-23 , 608 A.2d 63 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S. Ct. 383 , 121 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hodge
See, e.g., State v. Smith, 222 Conn. 1 , 14 n.8, 608 A.2d 63 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S. Ct. 383 , 121 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sanders v. State
In Knox , the Court of Criminal Appeals noted that courts often hold that a delay of eight months or more is “presumptively unreasonable and triggers speedy trial analysis” and therefore assumed for the purposes of the case before it that a ten-month delay was “prima facie unreasonable.” Id.; see also Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 956 (Tex.Cr.App.1992), cer t. denied, 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 381 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992). *603 In the instant case, nineteen months elapsed from the time of Appellant’s arrest on December 7, 1993 to the day trial began on July 26,1995.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fant v. State
(2×)
Ursery , ___ U.S. at ___, 116 S.Ct. at 2149 ; see, also, U.S. v. McCaslin, 959 F.2d 786 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied 506 U.S. 942 , 113 S.Ct. 382 , 121 L.Ed.2d 292 (1992)(wherein, the Ninth Circuit found the forfeiture of property that was the instrumentality of a crime was "independent of, and wholly unaffected by any criminal proceeding in personam," quoting The Palmyra, 25 U.S. (12 Wheat.) 1, 14-15 , 6 L.Ed. 531 (1827).).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rodriguez
These include but are not limited to the following: “(1) The reasons given for the challenge were not related to the trial of the case ... (2) the prosecutor failed to question the challenged juror or only questioned him or her in a perfunctory manner . . . (3) prospective jurors of one race were asked a question to elicit a particular response that was not asked of the other jurors ... (4) persons with the same or similar characteristics but not the same race as the challenged juror were not struck ... (5) the prosecutor advanced ‘an explanation based on a group bias where the group trait…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Watford et ux.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-492.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 19, 1992.
506 U.S. 942
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.