green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1997 ·
…the definition of an interest in property' ... is generally a matter of state law.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mason v. Zorn Industries, Inc. (In Re Underground Storage Tank Technical Services Group, Inc.)
(2×)
the definition of an interest in property' ... is generally a matter of state law.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cassirer v. Herskowitz (In Re Schick)
(2×)
Under Smyth, therefore, a payment made by a third party to a creditor of the debtor will amount to a transfer of the debtor’s property “when the payment represents a loan by the third party to the debtor and the debtor, rather than the lender, designates the creditor to be paid and controls the application of the loan.” 5 Lawrence P. King, et al., Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 547.03[2], at 547-24 (rev. 15th ed.1999) (citing Smyth); accord In re Smith, 966 F.2d 1527, 1533 (7th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 506 U.S. 1030 , 113 S.Ct. 683 , 121 L.Ed.2d 604 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Musso v. Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp. (In Re Westchester Tank Fabricators, Ltd.)
(2×)
Accord In re Smith, 966 F.2d 1527, 1533 (7th Cir.1992), cert. dismissed, Baker & Schultz, Inc. v. Boyer, 506 U.S. 1030 , 113 S.Ct. 683 , 121 L.Ed.2d 604 (1992); Coral Petroleum, Inc. v. Banque Paribas-London, 797 F.2d 1351, 1356 , rehearing denied, 801 F.2d 398 (5th Cir.1986); see also United States Lines, Inc. v. United States (In re McLean Indus., Inc.), 162 B.R. 410, 420 (S.D.N.Y.1993), reversed on other grounds, In re McLean Industries, Inc., 30 F.3d 385 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied United States Lines Reorganization Trust, Inc. v. United States, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 934 , 130 L.Ed.2d 880 (1…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Kelton Motors, Inc. Gleb Glinka, Trustee of the Estate of Kelton Motors, Inc. v. Bank of Vermont
(2×)
See In re Smith, 966 F.2d 1527, 1533 (7th Cir.) (describing the earmarking doctrine), cert. dismissed, 506 U.S. 1030 , 113 S.Ct. 683 , 121 L.Ed.2d 604 (1992); Coral Petroleum, Inc. v. Banque Paribas-London, 797 F.2d 1351, 1355-56 (5th Cir.1986) (same); cf. Smyth v. Kaufman (In re J.B.
cited
Cited "see"
Butler v. David Shaw Inc
See In re Smith, 966 F.2d 1527, 1535 (7th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 113 S. Ct. 683 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Algernon L. Butler, Jr., Trustee for Ed Tatum Motors, Incorporated v. David Shaw, Incorporated
(2×)
See In re Smith, 966 F.2d 1527, 1535 (7th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 506 U.S. 1030, 113 S.Ct. 683 , 121 L.Ed.2d 604 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re PA Bergner & Co. Holding Co.
(2×)
See Matter of Smith, 966 F.2d 1527, 1535-7 (7th Cir.1992), cert. dismissed ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 683 , 121 L.Ed.2d 604 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bergner v. Bank One, Milwaukee, N.A. (In re Bergner)
(2×)
See Matter of Smith, 966 F.2d 1527, 1535-7 (7th Cir.1992), cert. dismissed — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 683 , 121 L.Ed.2d 604 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kronz v. Cech (In Re Romano)
(2×)
See Matter of Smith, 966 F.2d 1527, 1535 (7th Cir.1992), cert. dismissed, Baker & Schultz, Inc. v. Boyer, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 683 , 121 L.Ed.2d 604 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re N. Eddie Montgomery and Southland Escrow Services, Inc., Consolidated Debtors. John C. McLemore Trustee v. Third National Bank in Nashville
(2×)
See Matter of Smith, 966 F.2d 1527 (7th Cir.), cert. dismissed, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 683 , 121 L.Ed.2d 604 (1992), where the debtor deposited a bad check against which he wrote a check in payment of an antecedent debt.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Glinka v. Bank of Vermont (In Re Kelton Motors, Inc.)
(2×)
See, e.g., Matter of Smith, 966 F.2d 1527, 1530 (7th Cir.), cert. dismissed, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 683 , 121 L.Ed.2d 604 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BAKER & SCHULTZ
v.
R. David BOYER, Trustee
v.
R. David BOYER, Trustee
No. 92-644.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 8, 1992.
113 S. Ct. 683
Cited by 34 opinions | Published
Citer courts: E.D. Michigan (2)
The petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed pursuant to Rule 46 of this Court.