green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.6 score
“relief under rule 60(b) ... is warranted only in exceptional circumstances.”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Accountability Burns v. Central Intelligency Agency
relief under rule 60(b) ... is warranted only in exceptional circumstances.
cited
Cited "see"
WADDELL & REED FINANCIAL, INC. v. Torchmark Corp.
See id. (citing Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992)).
cited
Cited "see"
B-S Steel of Kansas, Inc. v. Texas Industries, Inc.
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Equitable Production Co. v. Canales-Treviño
See Huddy v. Fruehauf Corp., 953 F.2d 955, 958 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 52 (1992) (noting that “Texas has a strong commitment to protecting its residents”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wei-Kang Zhou v. Pittsburg State University
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992). *1200 The Court affords a pro se plaintiff some leniency and must liberally construe the complaint.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sims
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Xiangyuan (Sue) Zhu v. Fisher, Cavanaugh, Smith & Lemon, P.A.
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Estate of Flake Ex Rel. Flake v. Hoskins
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992). *668 Analysis I.
cited
Cited "see"
Matosantos Commercial Corp. v. Applebee's International, Inc.
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Baseball Bat Antitrust Litigation (MDL No. 1249)
(2×)
See id. (citing Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992)). 5 2.
cited
Cited "see"
Aetna U.S. Healthcare, Inc. v. Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Conrad J. Braun v. Robert D. Hannigan Robert T. Stephan
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rideout v. Scott
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992). 8 Mr. Rideout states that a series of circumstances during March 12-26, 1998 hindered his ability to respond to the magistrate judge's report.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brown
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sperry Marketing, Inc. v. Newco, Inc. Swing N Slide Corporation
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992). 12 A similar rule governs Sperry's appeal of the issue of equitable estoppel.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Horton v. Janes
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 89 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Maraziti v. Thorpe
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maraziti v. Thorpe
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992). 13 Furthermore, Maraziti's claim that the government altered its position is without merit.
cited
Cited "see"
David A. Kersh v. Martin Balan, Individually Balan Printing Co., a New York Corporation
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 89 (1992). 4 The district court properly denied Kersh's Rule 60(b)(6) motion.
cited
Cited "see"
American Freight System, Inc. v. Point Sporting Goods (In Re American Freight System, Inc.)
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
American Airlines, Inc. v. Craig Tweedy
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991)(motion served more than ten days after judgment construed as one pursuant to Rule 60(b)), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 89 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Karara v. University of Denver
II. 10 "Relief under Rule 60(b) is extraordinary and may only be granted in exceptional circumstances." Bud Brooks Trucking, Inc. v. Bill Hodges Trucking Co., 909 F.2d 1437, 1440 (10th Cir.1990); accord Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 89 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Local Union No. 998
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992); Dalton v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, 863 F.2d 702, 703 (10th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Local Union No. 998
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992); Dalton v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, 863 F.2d 702, 703 (10th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Marshall v. Shalala
See Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dorula v. Flanders (In re Starlight Group, LLC)
See, e.g., Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243-44 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United Student Funds, Inc. v. Wylie (In Re Wylie)
See, e.g., Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243-44 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Plymale v. Donnelly
See, e.g., Hatfield v. Board of County Comm’rs, 52 F.3d 858 , 861 (10th Cir.1995) (The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not recognize a “motion to reconsider.'') (citing Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992)); Lavespere v. Niagara Mach. & Tool Works, Inc., 910 F.2d 167 , 173 (5th Cir.1990) (same) (partially abrogated on other grounds, see Little v. Liquid Air Corp., 37 F.3d 1069 , 1075-76 n. 14 (5th Cir.l994)(en banc)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Feathers v. Chevron
See, e.g., Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Feathers v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
See, e.g., Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grantham v. Ohio Casualty Co.
See, e.g., Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 828 , 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992); Dalton v. First Interstate Bank, 863 F.2d 702, 704 (10th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eugene R. Orner v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human Services
This court has held, without qualification, that “a mistake of law cannot be reached under [Rule] 60(b)(1) where [as here] no notice of appeal was timely filed from the order in which the mistake is alleged to have occurred, and the time for filing such a notice of appeal had expired *1310 when the [Rule] 60(b) motion was filed.” Morris v. Adams-Millis Corp., 758 F.2d 1352, 1358 (10th Cir.1985); see also Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1244 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Willie Stevenson v. The City of Kansas City, Kansas
See, e.g., Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 89 (1992); Dalton v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, 863 F.2d 702, 704 (10th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Folger
See also Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241, 1243 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 89 , 121 L.Ed.2d 51 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Illinois Employers Insurance of Wausau
v.
Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County
v.
Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County
No. 91-2022.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1992.
Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.