Henthorn v. United States, 510 U.S. 933 (1993). · Go Syfert
Henthorn v. United States, 510 U.S. 933 (1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“several other circuits have held that a request to 'look in' or 'look through' a vehicle is the equivalent of a request to 'search the vehicle.”
19 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Marquez (nysd, 1996-08-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Marquez
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
several other circuits have held that a request to 'look in' or 'look through' a vehicle is the equivalent of a request to 'search the vehicle.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Arroyo-Sotelo (2×)
Or. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. v. Rich, 992 F2d 502, 505 (5th Cir), cert den_US_, 114 S Ct 348 (1993); U.S. v. Ibarro, 965 F2d 1354, 1357, 1361 (5th Cir 1992).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Zucco
E.D. Tex. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See abo United States v. Rich, 992 F.2d 502 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 348 , 126 L.Ed.2d 312 (1993) (Under the circumstances, a reasonable person would have interpreted an affirmative response to officer's request "to have a look in” suspect's vehicle as the equivalent of general consent to search the automobile and its contents, including the suspect's luggage). 8 .
discussed Cited "see" People v. Hopkins
Colo. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rich, 992 F.2d 502, 505 (5th Cir.) (reasonableness under Fourth Amendment is a question of law subject to de novo review), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 348 , 126 L.Ed.2d 312 (1993); United States v. Evans, 937 F.2d 1534, 1536-37 (10th Cir.1991) (same); MeKinstrey, 852 P.2d at 473 n. 6 (“the question of objective reasonableness under Rodriguez is a question of law that is subject to de novo review”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jenkins (2×)
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
"Although objective reasonableness is a question of law [over which our review is plenary], the factual circumstances are highly relevant when determining what a reasonable person would have believed to be the outer bounds of the consent that was given." [36] United States v. Mendoza-Gonzalez, 318 F.3d 663, 667 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1049 , 123 S.Ct. 2114 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1091 (2003); see also, e.g., United States v. Rich, 992 F.2d 502, 505 (5th Cir.) ("[o]bjective reasonableness is a question of law that is reviewed de novo"), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 933 , 114 S.Ct. 348 , 126 L.Ed.2d …
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Salgado
W.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id. at 135 ; see also United States v. Rich, 992 F.2d 502 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 348 , 126 L.Ed.2d 312 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Henthorn
v.
United States
93-5370.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 18, 1993.
510 U.S. 933

510 U.S. 933

Henthorn
v.
United States.

No. 93-5370.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 18, 1993.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 990 F. 2d 1262.