green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.0 score
“he huge quantity of crack cocaine involved in this case permits an inference of conspiracy, but by itself this is not enough to convict defendant”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. James Alfred Miller
he huge quantity of crack cocaine involved in this case permits an inference of conspiracy, but by itself this is not enough to convict defendant
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hawkins
See United States v. Lechuga, 994 F.2d 346, 349 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (“A person who sells a gun knowing that the buyer intends to murder someone may or may not be an aider or abettor of the murder, but he is not a conspirator, because he and his buyer do not have an agreement to murder anyone.”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 982 , 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993); United States v. Tyler, 758 F.2d 66, 70-71 (2d Cir.1985) (reversing conviction for conspiracy to distribute heroin of defendant who helped willing buyer find willing seller, but affirming his conviction for aiding and abetting he…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Reno
United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); see United States v. Wicks, 995 F.2d 964, 972 (10th Cir.) (“The existence of probable cause is a ‘common-sense standard’ requiring ‘facts sufficient to warrant a man of reasonable caution in belief that an offense has been committed.’ ”) (quoting United States v. Mesa-Rincon, 911 F.2d 1433, 1439 (10th Cir.1990)) (quoting Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 174 , 69 S.Ct. 1302 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949)), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 982 , 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Warren
United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); see United States v. Wicks, 995 F.2d 964, 972 (10th Cir.) (“The existence of probable cause is a ‘commonsense standard’ requiring ‘facts sufficient “to warrant a man of reasonable caution in belief that an offense has been committed.” ’ ”) (quoting United States v. MesaRincon, 911 F.2d 1433, 1439 (10th Cir.1990) (quoting Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 174 , 69 S.Ct. 1302 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949)), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 982 , 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wiseman
United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); see United States v. Wicks, 995 F.2d 964, 972 (10th Cir.1993) (“The existence of probable cause is a ‘common-sense standard’ requiring ‘facts sufficient “to warrant a man of reasonable caution in belief that an offense has been committed.” ’ ”) (quoting United States v. Mesa-Rincon, 911 F.2d 1433, 1439 (10th Cir.1990) (quoting Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 174 , 69 S.Ct. 1302 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949)), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 982 , 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Chandler
United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); see United States v. Wicks, 995 F.2d 964, 972 (10th Cir.) (‘The existence of probable cause is a “common-sense standard” requiring “facts sufficient ‘to warrant a man of reasonable caution in belief that an offense has been committed.’”) (quoting United States v. Mesa-Rincon, 911 F.2d 1433, 1439 (10th Cir.1990) (quoting Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 175-76 , 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1311 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 982 , 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 [1993]).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kelley
United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); see United States v. Wicks, 995 F.2d 964, 972 (10th Cir.) (“The existence of probable cause is a ‘common-sense standard’ requiring ‘facts sufficient “to warrant a man of reasonable caution in belief that an offense has been committed.’””) (quoting United States v. Mesa-Rincon, 911 F.2d 1433, 1439 (10th Cir.1990) (quoting Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 174 , 69 S.Ct. 1302 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949)), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 982 , 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lee
United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); see United States v. Wicks, 995 F.2d 964, 972 (10th Cir.) (“The existence of probable cause is a ‘common-sense standard’ requiring ‘facts sufficient “to warrant a man of reasonable caution in belief that an offense has been committed.” ’ ”) (quoting United States v. Mesa-Rincon, 911 F.2d 1433, 1439 (10th Cir.1990) (quoting Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 175-76 , 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1311 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949)), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 982 , 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roger Turner
See United States v. Lechuga, 994 F.2d 346 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 982 , 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hogan
United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); see United States v. Wicks, 995 F.2d 964, 972 (10th Cir.) (“The existence of probable cause is a ‘common-sense standard’ requiring facts sufficient ‘ “to warrant a man of reasonable caution in belief that an offense has been committed.’””) (quoting United States v. Mesa-Rincon, 911 F.2d 1433, 1439 (10th Cir.1990) (quoting Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 175-76 , 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1311 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949)), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 982 , 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wyatt
See United States v. Wicks, 995 F.2d 964, 977-78 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 482 (1993); United States v. Johnson, 973 F.2d 857, 862 (10th Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lechuga
See United States v. Lechuga, 994 F.2d 346, 351 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilson
United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965); see United States v. Wicks, 995 F.2d 964, 972 (10th Cir.) (“The existence of probable cause is a ‘commonsense standard’ requiring ‘facts sufficient “to warrant a man or reasonable caution in belief that an offense has been committed.” ’ ”) (quoting United States v. Mesa-Rincon, 911 F.2d 1433, 1439 (10th Cir.1990) (quoting Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 174 , 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1310 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949))), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Freddie Hubbard
See United States v. Lechuga, 994 F.2d 346, 349 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993); United States v. Kellum, 42 F.3d 1087, 1091 (7th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Julio Ortiz
See United States v. Wicks, 995 F.2d 964, 978 (10th Cir.) (defendant pointing to missing record must submit affidavit or equivalent asserting plea not voluntary or that he lacked necessary understanding), cer t. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlos Sanchez-Bonilla
Sec. 7B1.3(f) and comment. (n. 5) (1994); see United States v. Schram, 9 F.3d 741, 742-43 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 482 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Amos Jimmy Jennings v. Dan Reynolds Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
See 2254(a) 3 Even if Boykin could be applied retroactively, "[t]he Supreme Court has made it clear that Boykin, which involved a direct review of a conviction, does not in critical respects apply to collateral attacks on previous convictions which have become final." United States v. Wicks, 995 F.2d 964, 977 (10th Cir.) (citing Parke v. Raley, 113 S.Ct. 517, 523-24 (1992)), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 482 (1993) 4 In his response to the magistrate judge's recommendation, petitioner did allege he was beaten and mistreated for five months before he appeared in court, at which time he was offered no…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Flakes Kellum and Lynetta P. Durr
See United States v. Lechuga, 994 F.2d 346, 349-50 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry A. Hensley
See Fallin, 946 F.2d at 58 (district court should consider the policy statement in effect at the time appellant is sentenced for violation of supervised release conditions); accord United States v. Schram, 9 F.3d 741, 742 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marcus L. Robertson
However, even a “warrant that describes items to be seized in broad and generic terms may be valid if the description is as specific as circumstances and nature of the activity under investigation permit.” Harris, 903 F.2d at 775 ; accord United States v. Wicks, 995 F.2d 964, 973 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald G. Anderson
See United States v. Wicks, 995 F.2d 964, 978 (10th Cir.) cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 482 (1993) (holding that, under the Armed Career Criminal Act, "once the government has established the fact of a prior conviction based on a guilty plea, the defendant has the entire burden of [proving] the invalidity of the conviction").
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Barlow
See United States v. Wicks, 995 F.2d 964, 977 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. McDaniel
I, § 10, cl. 1; see also Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37 , 110 S.Ct. 2715 , 111 L.Ed.2d 30 (1990) (law that aggravates a crime, after it was committed, violates Ex Post Facto Clause); Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 30 , 101 S.Ct. 960 , 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1981) (change in sentencing procedures violates ex post facto clause “if it is both retrospective and more onerous than the law in effect on the date of the offense”); United States v. Crozier, 777 F.2d 1376, 1383 (9th Cir.1985) (Ex Post Facto Clause bars any law that “imposes a punishment for an act which was not punishable at the time …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Boidi
Compare United States v. Hawkins, 547 F.3d 66, 74-75 (2d Cir.2008), and United States v. Lechuga, 994 F.2d 346, 350-51 (7th Cir.) (en banc) (Posner, *30 J.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 982 , 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993). 4 . 2 LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law § 12.2(c)(6), at 285 (2d ed. 2003) ("[TJhere must be a common design, so that if only one party to the agreement has the necessary mental state then even that person may not be convicted of conspiracy.”); see Developments in the Law: Criminal Conspiracy, 72 Harv.L.Rev. 922, 927 (1959). 5 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William E. Eneff
See, e.g., United States v. Lechuga, 994 F.2d 346, 347-48 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William E. Eneff
See, e.g., United States v. Lechuga, 994 F.2d 346, 347-48 (7th Cir. 1993) (en banc), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 482 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Steven Charles Martin
United States v. Unger, 915 F.2d 759, 761 (1st Cir.1990) (citing cases from the Fourth, Seventh, and Eighth Circuits), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1104 (1991); see also United States v. Wicks, 995 F.2d 964, 977-78 (10th Cir.) (once the government establishes the fact of a prior conviction based on a guilty plea, the defendant has the burden of proving the invalidity of the conviction), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 482 (1993); United States v. Johnson, 973 F.2d 857, 862 (10th Cir.1992) ("Defendant ... had the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the conviction was constitutionally in…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Taylor
"An ongoing relationship involving the distribution of drugs is evidence of a concert of action." Koenig, 856 F.2d at 854 ; [ United States v. Mancillas, 580 F.2d 1301 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 958 , 99 S.Ct. 361 (1978) ] at 1307. 82 United States v. Douglas, 874 F.2d 1145, 1152 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 841 , 110 S.Ct. 126 (1989); see also United States v. Lechuga, 994 F.2d 346, 349-50 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 482 (1993). 83 Viewed favorably to the government, the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conspiracy conviction.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert J. Paters
See, e.g., United States v. Lechuga, 994 F.2d 346, 349 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 482 , 126 L.Ed.2d 433 (1993); Townsend, 924 F.2d at 1394 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nelson Rivas and Cristobal Rosas
See, e.g., United States v. Lechuga, 994 F.2d 346 (7th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 482 (1993); United States v. Townsend, 924 F.2d 1385 (7th Cir.1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Zack
v.
United States
v.
United States
93-6301.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 15, 1993.
Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (1)
Zack
v.
United States.
No. 93-6301.
Supreme Court of United States.
November 15, 1993.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 11th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 998 F. 2d 1021.