green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America v. Herman McGee
See English v. United States, 998 F.2d 609, 612-13 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1001 , 114 S.Ct. 573 , 126 L.Ed.2d 472 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Manuel Moreno-Perez v. United States
See English v. United States, 998 F.2d 609, 613 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 573 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Manuel Moreno-Perez v. United States
See English v. United States, 998 F.2d 609, 613 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 573 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Jenner v. Joe Class
See English v. United States, 998 F.2d 609, 613 (8th Cir.) (ineffective assistance of counsel not demonstrated by attorney's failure to call a witness to impeach another witness), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 573 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Jenner v. Joe Class, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary Mark W. Barnett, South Dakota Attorney General
See English v. United States, 998 F.2d 609, 613 (8th Cir.) (ineffective assistance of counsel not demonstrated by attorney’s failure to call a witness to impeach another witness), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 573 , 126 L.Ed.2d 472 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Bartholomew Carper
See English v. United States, 998 F.2d 609, 613 (8th Cir.) (court did not err in denying section 2255 relief where, assuming counsel performed deficiently, no prejudice resulted), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 573 (1993). 5 We also reject Carper's contention that his post-conviction counsel was ineffective, because he was not constitutionally entitled to effective assistance of counsel in the section 2255 proceeding.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kenneth Taylor v. United States
See English v. United States, 998 F.2d 609, 612-13 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 573 (1993). 10 While Taylor contends that his attorney did not argue effectively on direct appeal, the fact remains that his current claim does not provide a significantly different basis for relief.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tyrone Maurice Clark
(2×)
See United States v. Hanif, 1 F.3d 998, 1004 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 573 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kendall R. Dean
See United States v. Hanif, 1 F.3d 998, 1002 (10th Cir.) (failure to provide adequate record requires court to reject appellant's arguments), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 573 (1993); McEwen v. City of Norman, Okla., 926 F.2d 1539, 1550 (10th Cir.1991) (same). 5 Finally, we wish to point out that at oral argument, defense counsel represented to us that he had included the entire trial transcript in the record on appeal.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Philip Senegal v. Theo White, Warden
Turner v. Marshall, 63 F.3d 807 , 811 n. 1 (9th Cir.1995) 2 We do not review questions of state evidence law, "[o]n federal habeas we may only consider whether the petitioner's conviction violated [federal] constitutional norms." Jamal v. Van De Kamp, 926 F.2d 918, 919 (9th Cir.1991) 3 "The standard for reviewing the prima facie showing is actually unsettled in this circuit." See United States v. Castaneda, 16 F.3d 1504, 1507 (9th Cir.1994); compare Arias-Villanueva, 998 F.2d 1491 , 1502, cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 573 (1993). with United States v. Arambula-Ruiz, 987 F.2d 599, 607 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Chris Hager, and Michael Allen Hall, Peter Myer Hubble, Wentworth Matthew Houghton, and John Lampkins
See United States v. Xavier, 2 F.3d 1281, 1285-86 (3d Cir.1993); United States v. Bello-Perez, 977 F.2d 664, 672 (1st Cir.1992); see also United States v. Arias-Villanueva, 998 F.2d 1491, 1502 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 573 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael G. Sprague, Sr., United States of America v. Marsha Elaine Ervin
See United States v. Helmy, 951 F.2d 988 , 997 & n. 7 (9th Cir.) ("For purposes of [the Sec. 3B1.1(b) enhancement], a person may be deemed criminally responsible even though that person has not been convicted."), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 2287 (1992); see also United States v. Arias-Villanueva, 998 F.2d 1491, 1513-14 (9th Cir.) (indicted co-conspirators sufficient to support "criminally responsible" requirement for manager or supervisor enhancement), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 573 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gutberto Beltran-Gutierrez, United States of America v. Jose Beltran Cardenas
See United States v. Rosales, 917 F.2d 1220, 1222 (9th Cir.1990) (noting that the determination as to whether a defendant has accepted responsibility and is therefore entitled to a downward adjustment is a question of fact); United States v. Chapnick, 963 F.2d 224, 226 (9th Cir.1992) (this court reviews factual findings at sentencing for clear error); see also United States v. Arias-Villanueva, 998 F.2d 1491, 1513 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 573 (1993) (two-level adjustments for acceptance of responsibility are reviewed for clear error); United States v. Donovan, 996 F.2d 1343, 1346 (1…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Plancarte-Raya
v.
United States
v.
United States
93-6449.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 1993.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Plancarte-Raya
v.
United States.
No. 93-6449.
Supreme Court of United States.
November 29, 1993.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 998 F. 2d 1491.