green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.8 score
“magnolia bar ass'n ii”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Denish v. Johnson
See Magnolia Bar Ass’n v. Lee, 793 F.Supp. 1386, 1411 (S.D.Miss.1992) (discussing the benefits of staggering judicial terms), aff'd, 994 F.2d 1143 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 994 , 114 S.Ct. 555 , 126 L.Ed.2d 456 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reed v. Town of Babylon
See Magnolia Bar Ass’n, Inc. v. Lee, 793 F.Supp. 1386, 1397 (S.D.Miss.1992) (noting that "[i]n voting rights cases where only a bare [voting] majority district can be created, the majority threshold requirement and the su-permajority remedial emphasis leave courts in a quandary”), aff'd, 994 F.2d 1143 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 555 , 126 L.Ed.2d 456 (1993). 29 .
cited
Cited "see"
Vecinos de Barrio v. City of Holyoke
See ___ Magnolia Bar Ass'n, Inc. v. Lee, 994 F.2d 1143, 1147 (5th Cir.), ________________________ ___ cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 555 (1993); see also S. Rep.
cited
Cited "see"
Vecinos De Barrio Uno v. City of Holyoke
See Magnolia Bar Ass’n, Inc. v. Lee, 994 F.2d 1143, 1147 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 555 , 126 L.Ed.2d 456 (1993); see also S.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sebastian
See, e.g., Buzzard v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 992 F.2d 1073, 1076-77 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 994 , 114 S. Ct. 555 , 126 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alaska ex rel. Yukon Flats School District v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government
See, e.g., Buzzard v. Oklahoma Tax Comm’n, 992 F.2d 1073 , 1076-77 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 994 , 114 S.Ct. 555 , 126 L.Ed.2d 456 (1993); Blatchford v. Sullivan, 904 F.2d 542, 548-49 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1035 , 111 S.Ct. 699 , 112 L.Ed.2d 689 (1991); Weddell v. Meierhenry, 636 F.2d 211, 212-13 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 941 , 101 S.Ct. 2024 , 68 L.Ed.2d 329 (1981); United States v. Adair, 913 F.Supp. 1503, 1515 (E.D.Okla.1995); United States v. Mound, 477 F.Supp. 156, 160 (D.S.D.1979); Youngbear v. Brewer, 415 F.Supp. 807, 809 (N.D.Iowa 1976), aff'd,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8373, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,963 State of Alaska Ex Rel. Yukon Flats School District, Unalakleet/neeser Construction Jv, Unalakleet Native Corporation, Neeser Construction Company, and Gerald Neeser v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, A/K/A the Native Village of Venetie, the Venetie Tax Court, the Venetie Tax Commission, Gideon James, Lawrence Roberts, Larry Williams, Ernest Erick, Lincoln Tritt, John Titus, and David Case
See, e.g., Buzzard v. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n, 992 F.2d 1073 , 1076-77 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 994 , 114 S.Ct. 555 , 126 L.Ed.2d 456 (1993); Blatchford v. Sullivan, 904 F.2d 542, 548-49 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1035 , 111 S.Ct. 699 , 112 L.Ed.2d 689 (1991); Weddell v. Meierhenry, 636 F.2d 211, 212-13 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 941 , 101 S.Ct. 2024 , 68 L.Ed.2d 329 (1981); United States v. Adair, 913 F.Supp. 1503, 1515 (E.D.Okla.1995); United States v. Mound, 477 F.Supp. 156, 160 (D.S.D.1979); Youngbear v. Brewer, 415 F.Supp. 807, 809 (N.D.Iowa 1976), aff'd, 5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harvell v. Blytheville School District 5
(2×)
Compare Magnolia Bar Ass’n, Inc. v. Lee, 994 F.2d 1143, 1148-50 (5th Cir.) (where African-American candidates won two high profile elections with 58% and 30% of the white vote, no. clear error in finding the third precondition not satisfied despite expert’s testimony that white bloc voting was legally significant and these elections were aberrational), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 555 , 126 L.Ed.2d 456 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harvell v. Blytheville School District # 5
Compare Magnolia Bar Ass'n, Inc. v. Lee, 994 F.2d 1143, 1148-50 (5th Cir.) (where African-American candidates won two high profile elections with 58% and 30% of the white vote, no clear error in finding the third precondition not satisfied despite expert's testimony that white bloc voting was legally significant and these elections were aberrational), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 555 , 126 L.Ed.2d 456 (1993). 39 B.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stauber v. Shalala
To do so, plaintiffs must allege injuries or threatened injuries that are “concrete and particularized” and show that they have “an actual stake in the outcome [of the case] that goes beyond intellectual or academic curiosity.” Family & Children’s Ctr. v. School City, 13 F.3d 1052, 1058 (7th Cir.1994) (quoting South East Lake View Neighbors v. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, 685 F.2d 1027, 1033 (7th Cir.1982)); see also Schmidling v. City of Chicago, 1 F.3d 494, 498 (7th Cir.1993) (injury or threat “must be both real and immediate, not conjectural or ‘hypothetical’ ”)…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schmidling
v.
City of Chicago
v.
City of Chicago
93-625.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 1993.
Schmidling et al.
v.
City of Chicago.
No. 93-625.
Supreme Court of United States.
November 29, 1993.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 7th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 1 F. 3d 494.