green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Walter Clinton Hall
But see United States v. Thomas, 991 F.2d 206, 212 (6th Cir.) (holding that state can restore civil rights either affirmatively or automatically, individually or generally), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 607 , 126 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993); United States v. Dahms, 938 F.2d 131, 133 (9th Cir.1991) (same); United States v. Essick, 935 F.2d 28, 29-30 (4th Cir.1991) (same); United States v. Erwin, 902 F.2d 510, 512-13 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 859 , 111 S.Ct. 161 , 112 L.Ed.2d 127 (1990); United States v. Cassidy, 899 F.2d 543, 549 (6th Cir.1990) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Chenowith
United States v. Osborne, 262 F.3d 486, 489 (5th Cir.2001); see United States v. Thomas, 991 F.2d 206, 213 (5th Cir.) (“[r]emaining faithful to the Ninth Circuit’s two-step approach” in United States v. Gomez, 911 F.2d 219, 221 (9th Cir.1990)), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1014 , 114 S.Ct. 607 , 126 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Middleton v. Evatt
See Drayton v. Evatt , 430 S.E.2d 517 , 519 17 (S.C.), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 607 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Middleton v. Evatt
See Drayton v. Evatt, 430 S.E.2d 517, 519 (S.C.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 607 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackson
See United States v. Thomas, 991 F.2d 206, 214 (5th Cir.) (“Texas neither actively nor passively restores all or essentially all of the civil rights of criminals ... upon release from jail-For purposes of the instant inquiry, then, Texas ... fails to meet muster under any of the approaches of the several circuits that have addressed the concept of restoration of civil rights as contemplated in § 921(a)(20).” (footnotes omitted)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 607 , 126 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Woodall
See also United States v. Thomas, 991 F.2d 206, 213-14 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1014 , 114 S.Ct. 607 , 126 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993) (hold ing that Texas’ failure to deny a non-violent felon the right to possess firearms is not the “functional equivalent” of restoring her civil rights within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 921 (a)(20)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kornahrens v. Evatt
See also Drayton v. Evatt, 312 S.C. 4 , 430 S.E.2d 517, 519 {"In favorem vitae review requires us to painstakingly inspect capital cases to determine whether prejudicial error has been committed in a trial irrespective of whether an assignment of error has been made by the defendant.”), cer t. denied,-U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 607 , 126 L.Ed.2d 572 (1993). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crowe v. Smith
Nor do we; however, “this defect — if defect it is — is inherent in the statute as written, and its correction must lie with Congress.” Sedima, 473 U.S. at 499, 105 S.Ct. at 3286-87; see also U.S. v. Thomas, 991 F.2d 206, 215 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 607 , 126 L.Ed.2d 572 (“Actual or potential aberrant results, however, do not excuse reading (or writing) anything into or out of a statute that Congress has so consciously adopted.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Drayton
v.
Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections
v.
Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections
93-5929.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 6, 1993.
Published
Drayton
v.
Evatt, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections.
No. 93-5929.
Supreme Court of United States.
December 6, 1993.
1
Appeal from the Sup. Ct. S. C.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 312 S. C. 4, 430 S. E. 2d 517.