green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Geissal v. Moore Medical Corp.
See Kuhl v. Lincoln National Health Plan of Kansas City, 999 F.2d 298, 304-05 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1045 , 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Avoyelles Publishing Co. v. Ieyoub
See Ritter v. Ross, 992 F.2d 750, 752 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Person v. Physicians Health Plan, Inc.
See Kuhl v. Lincoln Nat’l Health Plan of Kansas City, Inc., 999 F.2d 298 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1045 , 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994) (holding state law claims arose from HMO’s administration of benefits under the health benefit plan and were therefore preempted by ERISA in case where HMO denied precertification for surgery). 10 In the instant case, there is no allegation of medical malpractice under the Virginia Code in the Motion for Judgment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronald Ellison Julie Johnsrud Ronald Ellison, as of the Estate of Lois Ellison v. Spectrastar, Dba: Llumar Star Kites
See Kuhl v. Lincoln Nat'l Health Plan of Kansas City, Inc., 999 F.2d 298 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 694 (1994); Corcoran v. United HealthCare, Inc., 965 F.2d 1321 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1033 (1992); Settles v. Golden Rule Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fox v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.
See Kuhl v. Lincoln Nat’l Health Plan, 999 F.2d 298, 302 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1045 , 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994) (tortious interference with contract preempted); Tingey v. Pixley-Richards West, Inc., 953 F.2d 1124, 1131 (9th Cir.1992) (same); Maciosek v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin, 930 F.2d 536, 538, 541-42 (7th Cir.1991) (claims of tortious interference with contract “obviously are preempted,” affirming Rule 11 sanctions against lawyer who pled claim).
cited
Cited "see"
Kenneth M. Datka v. Honorable Robert J. Kennedy, Circuit Court Judge, Walworth County, Personally and in His Official Capacity
See Ritter v. Ross, 992 F.2d 750, 754 (7th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 694 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mattie Tolton and Ronald Tolton v. American Biodyne, Inc.
See Kuhl v. Lincoln National Health Plan, 999 F.2d 298, 302-03 , (8th Cir.1993) (ERISA preempted wrongful death claim based upon delayed preauthorization for surgery), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994); Spain v. Aetna Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pomeroy v. Johns Hopkins Medical Services, Inc.
See Kuhl v. Lincoln National Health Plan of Kansas City, Inc., 999 F.2d 298, 303 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994) (“Artful pleading by characterizing [the provider’s] actions in refusing to pay for the surgery ... or by characterizing the same administrative decisions as ‘malpractice’ does not change the fact that plaintiffs’ claims are based on the contention that [the plan provider] improperly processed [plaintiffs] claim for medical benefits.”); Nealy v. U.S. Healthcare HMO, 844 F.Supp. 966, 973 (S.D.N.Y.1994) (“[N]o matter how the…
cited
Cited "see"
Bailey-Gates v. Aetna Life Insurance
See Kuhl v. Lincoln National Health Plan of Kansas City, Inc., 999 F.2d 298, 303 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roy C. Tassinare v. American National Insurance Company
See Kuhl v. Lincoln Nat’l Health Plan, 999 F.2d 298, 304 (8th Cir.1993) (emotional distress claim preempted), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994); Maciosek v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 930 F.2d 536, 540 (7th Cir.1991) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lowe v. Jay (In Re Jay-Reyna Homes & Constr., Inc.)
See Latham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 987 F.2d 1199, 1201-02 (5th Cir.1993) (citing Jones v. Estelle, 693 F.2d 547, 549 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied 460 U.S. 1072 , 103 S.Ct. 1528 , 75 L.Ed.2d 950 (1983)) (holding that parties have "a duty to inquire periodically into the status of their litigation” and that a parties failure to receive notice of an order did not excuse the party from complying with the deadlines set by *718 applicable rules); see also McKethan v. Tex. Farm Bureau, 996 F.2d 734, 740 (5th Cir.1993), ce rt. denied 510 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994) ("Simply…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peterson v. Fox
See Fortune v. Mulherrin, 533 F.2d 21, 22 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 864 , 97 S.Ct. 170 , 50 L.Ed.2d 143 (1976); see also Ritter v. Ross, 992 F.2d 750, 754 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lancaster Ex Rel. Lancaster v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.
See, e.g., Kuhl v. Lincoln Nat'l Health Plan of Kansas City, Inc., 999 F.2d 298, 302 (8th Cir. 1993) (affirming district court’s ruling that ERISA preempted plaintiffs’ medical malpractice claim against decedent’s HMO because defendant's decision to delay pre-certification of heart surgery "cannot be stretched to imply that [defendant] went beyond the administration of benefits and undertook to provide [decedent] with medical advice"), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1045 , 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994); Corcoran v. United Healthcare.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
W.G. Pettigrew Distributing Co. v. Borden, Inc.
See also McKethan v. Texas Farm Bureau, 996 F.2d 734 (5th Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 1046 , 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994) (statements not slanderous as a matter of law where no reasonable jury could find so) (Texas law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Board of Trustees v. American Benefit Plan Administrators, Inc.
See, Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248, 255 , 113 S.Ct. 2063, 2068 , 124 L.Ed.2d 161 (1993); see also, Kuhl v. Lincoln Nat’l Health Plan, 999 F.2d 298, 304-05 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994); Kerns v. Benefit Trust Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pappas v. Asbel
See, e.g., Kuhl v. Lincoln National Health Plan, 999 F.2d 298 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1045 , 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994) (claim against HMO for denying surgical precertification preempted by ERISA); Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc., 965 F.2d 1321 (1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1033 , 113 S.Ct. 812 , 121 L.Ed.2d 684 (1992) (claims against HMO for failure to provide hospitalization to expectant mother resulting in death of unborn child).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Strasen v. Strasen
See also Ritter v. Ross, 992 F.2d 750, 753 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Skogquist Trucking & Excavating Inc. v. Minnesota Workers' Compensation Assigned Risk Plan
Plaintiffs contend that the RNW benefit plan is an ERISA “employee benefit plan” and that sections 176 and 79A are preempted because they “relate to” RNW’s plan. 6 In interpreting ERISA section 514(a), the Supreme Court has instructed that “[a] law ‘relates to’ an employee benefit plan, in the normal sense of the phrase, if it has a connection with or reference to such a plan.” Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon, 498 U.S. 133, 139 , 111 S.Ct. 478, 483 , 112 L.Ed.2d 474 (1990) (quoting Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 96-97 , 103 S.Ct. 2890, 2900 , 77 L.Ed.2d 490 (1983…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc.
Co. v. Dedeaux, 481 U.S. 41, 48 , 107 S.Ct. 1549, 1553 , 95 L.Ed.2d 39 (1987) (common law cause of action arising from “improper processing of a claim for benefits” preempted by ERISA); see also Kuhl v. Lincoln Nat’l Health Plan, Inc., 999 F.2d 298, 303 (8th Cir.1993) (medical malpractice claim against plan administrator for delaying pre-certification of heart surgery arose from administration of benefits and therefore was preempted), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994); Berger v. Edgewater Steel Co., 911 F.2d 911, 923 (3d Cir.1990) (claim against plan spons…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cecilia Dukes, Trustee Ad Litem of the Estate of Darryl Dukes, Deceased v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc. Germantown Hospital & Medical Center William W. Banks, M.D. Charles R. Drew Mental Health Center Edward B. Hosten, M.D. Serena Mary Visconti, Deceased, by Linda and Ronald Visconti, as Administrators of the Estate of Serena Mary Visconti, Deceased Linda Visconti Ronald Visconti, in Their Own Right v. U.S. Health Care, A/K/A the Health Maintenance Organization of Pennsylvania/nj
Co. v. Dedeaux, 481 U.S. 41, 48 , 107 S.Ct. 1549, 1553 , 95 L.Ed.2d 39 (1987) (common law cause of action arising from "improper processing of a claim for benefits" preempted by ERISA); see also Kuhl v. Lincoln Nat'l Health Plan, Inc., 999 F.2d 298, 303 (8th Cir.1993) (medical malpractice claim against plan administrator for delaying pre-certification of heart surgery arose from administration of benefits and therefore was preempted), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 694 , 126 L.Ed.2d 661 (1994); Berger v. Edgewater Steel Co., 911 F.2d 911, 923 (3d Cir.1990) (claim against plan sponsor f…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McKethan
v.
Texas Farm Bureau
v.
Texas Farm Bureau
93-763.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1994.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
McKethan
v.
Texas Farm Bureau et al.
No. 93-763.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 10, 1994.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 996 F. 2d 734.